The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enzyme-producing bacteria isolated from fish gut: a review
Open accessAbstract
Digestion of food depends on three main factors: (i) the ingested food and the extent to which the food is susceptible to the effects of digestive enzymes, (ii) the activity of the digestive enzymes and (iii) the length of time the food is exposed to the action of the digestive enzymes. Each of these factors is affected by a multitude of secondary factors. The present review highlights the experimental results on the secondary factor, enzymatic activity and possible contribution of the fish gut microbiota in nutrition. It has been suggested that fish gut microbiota might have positive effects to the digestive processes of fish, and these studies have isolated and identified the enzyme-producing microbiota. In addition to Bacillus genera, Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Flavobacterium, Photobacterium, Pseudomonas, Vibrio, Microbacterium, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, unidentified anaerobes and yeast are also suggested to be possible contributors. However, in contrast to endothermic animals, it is difficult to conclude the exact contribution of the gastrointestinal microbiota because of the complexity and variable ecology of the digestive tract of different fish species, the presence of stomach and pyloric caeca and the relative intestinal length. The present review will critically evaluate the results to establish whether or not intestinal microbiota do contribute to fish nutrition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial properties of tannins
Scalbert, A. (1991) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/0031-9422(91)83426-l · Cited by 2,321
Role of gastrointestinal microbiota in fish
Nayak, S. K. (2010) · Aquaculture Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02546.x · Cited by 1,073
The bacterial microflora of fish, revised
Austin, B. (2006) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/tsw.2006.181 · Cited by 346
Cited by
The Gut Microbiota of Marine Fish
Egerton, S., Culloty, S., Whooley, J., Stanton, C., & Ross, R. P. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00873 · Cited by 963
Intestinal microbiota in fishes: what's known and what's not
Clements, K. D., Angert, E. R., Montgomery, W. L., & Choat, J. H. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12699 · Cited by 375
Use of probiotics in aquaculture of China—a review of the past decade
Wang, A., Ran, C., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Ding, Q., Yang, Y., Olsen, R. E., Ringø, E., Bindelle, J., & Zhou, Z. (2019) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2018.12.026 · Cited by 346
Self-citationJing, T.-Z., Qi, F.-H., & Wang, Z.-Y. (2020) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00823-y · Cited by 341
Rohani, M. F., Islam, S. M., Hossain, M. K., Ferdous, Z., Siddik, M. A., Nuruzzaman, M., Padeniya, U., Brown, C., & Shahjahan, M. (2022) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2021.12.037 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Ray, A. K., Ghosh, K., & Ringø, E.
- Venue
- Aquaculture Nutrition
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2012-04-20
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 465-492
- ISSN
- 1353-5773 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132624627
- Cited by
- 700
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enzyme-producing bacteria isolated from fish gut: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2012.00943.x
- The paper
- Ray, A. K., Ghosh, K., & Ringø, E. (2012). Enzyme-producing bacteria isolated from fish gut: a review. Aquaculture Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2012.00943.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.