The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lactic acid bacteria vs. pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract of fish: a review
Open accessAbstract
Intensive fish production worldwide has increased the risk of infectious diseases. However, before any infection can be established, pathogens must penetrate the primary barrier. In fish, the three major routes of infection are the skin, gills and gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The GI tract is essentially a muscular tube lined by a mucous membrane of columnar epithelial cells that exhibit a regional variation in structure and function. In the last two decades, our understanding of the endocytosis and translocation of bacteria across this mucosa, and the sorts of cell damage caused by pathogenic bacteria, has increased. Electron microscopy has made a valuable contribution to this knowledge. In the fish-farming industry, severe economic losses are caused by furunculosis (agent, Aeromonas salmonicida spp. salmonicida) and vibriosis [agent, Vibrio (Listonella) anguillarum]. This article provides an overview of the GI tract of fish from an electron microscopical perspective focusing on cellular damage (specific attack on tight junctions and desmosomes) caused by pathogenic bacteria, and interactions between the ‘good’ intestinal bacteria [e.g. lactic acid bacteria (LAB)] and pathogens. Using different in vitro methods, several studies have demonstrated that co-incubation of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) foregut (proximal intestine) with LAB and pathogens can have beneficial effects, the cell damage caused by the pathogens being prevented, to some extent, by the LAB. However, there is uncertainty over whether or not similar effects are observed in other species such as Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.). When discussing cellular damage in the GI tract of fish caused by pathogenic bacteria, several important questions arise including: (1) Do different pathogenic bacteria use different mechanisms to infect the gut? (2) Does the gradual development of the GI tract from larva to adult affect infection? (3) Are there different infection patterns between different fish species? The present article addresses these and other questions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Probiotics in marine larviculture
Vine, N. G., Leukes, W. D., & Kaiser, H. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00017.x · Cited by 436
Cited by
The Gut Microbiota of Marine Fish
Egerton, S., Culloty, S., Whooley, J., Stanton, C., & Ross, R. P. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00873 · Cited by 963
Beneficial roles of feed additives as immunostimulants in aquaculture: a review
Dawood, M. A. O., Koshio, S., & Esteban, M. Á. (2018) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12209 · Cited by 921
Rombout, J. H. W. M., Abelli, L., Picchietti, S., Scapigliati, G., & Kiron, V. (2011) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2010.09.001 · Cited by 608
Hoseinifar, S. H., Sun, Y.-Z., Wang, A., & Zhou, Z. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02429 · Cited by 601
Prebiotics as immunostimulants in aquaculture: A review
Song, S. K., Beck, B. R., Kim, D., Park, J., Kim, J., Kim, H. D., & Ringø, E. (2014) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2014.06.016 · Cited by 472
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ringø, E., Løvmo, L., Kristiansen, M., Bakken, Y., Salinas, I., Myklebust, R., Olsen, R. E., & Mayhew, T. M.
- Venue
- Aquaculture Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 451-467
- ISSN
- 1355-557X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2109
- OpenAlex
- W2078066066
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lactic acid bacteria vs. pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract of fish: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02339.x
- The paper
- Ringø, E., Løvmo, L., Kristiansen, M., Bakken, Y., Salinas, I., Myklebust, R., Olsen, R. E., & Mayhew, T. M. (2010). Lactic acid bacteria vs. pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract of fish: a review. Aquaculture Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02339.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.