Cited by 28Treatment of Major DepressionSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Differential effects on suicidal ideation of mianserin, maprotiline and amitriptyline.

Open access
Montgomery, S, Cronholm, B, Asberg, M, Montgomery, DB·1978·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Eighty patients suffering from primary depressive illness were treated for 4 weeks, following a 7-d (at least) no-treatment period, with either mianserin 60 mg daily (n = 50), maprotiline 150 mg at nighttime (n = 15) or amitriptyline 150 mg at night-time (n = 15) in double-blind controlled trials run con- currently in the same hospital on protocols having the same design and entry criteria.2 The effects of the three drugs were examined for their proffle of action using a new depression rating scale (Montgomery and Asberg Depression Scale, MADS) claimed to be more sensitive to change.There was no significant difference in mean entry scores or mean amelioration of depression on the MADS or the Hamilton Rating Scale (HRS) between the three drugs, but individual items on the MADS did show significant differences in amelioration.A highly significant (P < 0.01) difference was observed in favour of mianserin against maprotiline on both items of 'suicidal thoughts' and 'pessimistic thoughts' on the MADS.The suicidal item on the HRS showed a similar tendency which did not reach significance.3 This finding is considered in relation to a possible mode of action of mianserin and the relevance to reported subgroups of depressive illness with increased suicidal ideation.4 The increasing problems of self-poisoning with tricyclic and tetracyclic antidepressants are dis- cussed in relation to the reported relative lack of toxicity of mianserin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1978.tb04580.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of 10 studies that compared the effects of serotonergic antidepressants to noradrenergic antidepressants on suicidal ideation, five favored serotonergic drugs, one favored a noradrenergic drug, and four found no difference.

    “In fact, of 10 such studies that compared the effects of serotonergic antidepressants to noradrenergic antidepressants on suicidal ideation, five studies favored serotonergic drugs 316-320 , one study favored a noradrenergic drug 321 , and four studies found no difference 322-325 .”

    From Suicide and suicide risk (2019) · cites this paper as [317]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montgomery, S., Cronholm, B., Asberg, M., & Montgomery, D.
Affiliations
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-02
Volume
5
Issue
S1
Pages
77S-80S
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W1563093464
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
suicidal ideation, mianserin, maprotiline, amitriptyline, major depressive disorder, antidepressant efficacy, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, tricyclic antidepressant poisoning, self-poisoning, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
MeSH terms
Adult, Amitriptyline, Anthracenes, Clinical Trials as Topic, Depression, Dibenzazepines, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Maprotiline, Mianserin, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review