Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interphenotype differences in disposition and effect on gastrin levels of omeprazole—suitability of omeprazole as a probe for CYP2C19.

Open access
Chang, M, Tybring, G, Dahl, ML, Gotharson, E, Sagar, M, Seensalu, R, Bertilsson, L·1995·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

1. Fourteen healthy Swedish Caucasian subjects were given 20 mg of omeprazole orally each morning for 8 days. The subjects included five poor metabolisers (PM) of S‐mephenytoin, four heterozygous extensive metabolisers (hetEM) and five subjects with a very rapid metabolism (rapidEM). 2. After the first dose, the relative mean areas under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) of omeprazole in rapidEM, hetEM and PM were 1:3.7:20 (all different, P < 0.001). A similar relation was seen in the AUC(0,10 h) of the sulphone metabolite (1:3:12). Concentrations of hydroxyomeprazole were higher in EM than in PM confirming that the hydroxy, but not the sulphone metabolite, is formed by the S‐mephenytoin hydroxylase (CYP2C19). After 8 days of treatment, the differences between groups were similar. 3. After both the first and the eighth doses, the omeprazole/hydroxyomeprazole plasma concentration ratio, determined 3 h after drug intake, correlated with the mephenytoin S/R ratio (rs = 0.94; P < 0.001; n = 14) suggesting that omeprazole might be used to phenotype for CYP2C19. 4. After the first dose of omeprazole, there was no difference in the AUC(0,10 h) of plasma gastrin between the three groups. From the first to the eighth dose, the AUC(0,10) of gastrin increased significantly in both hetEM and PM, while there was no change in the rapidEM. After the eighth dose, the AUC(0,10) of gastrin correlated significantly with the AUC of omeprazole in plasma (rs = 0.79; P < 0.01; n = 13).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb04488.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Chang, M., Tybring, G., Dahl, M., Gotharson, E., Sagar, M., Seensalu, R., & Bertilsson, L.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-05
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
511-518
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W2094212245
Cited by
184
References
1
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interphenotype differences in disposition and effect on gastrin levels of omeprazole—suitability of omeprazole as a probe for CYP2C19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb04488.x
The paper
Chang, M., Tybring, G., Dahl, M., Gotharson, E., Sagar, M., Seensalu, R., & Bertilsson, L. (1995). Interphenotype differences in disposition and effect on gastrin levels of omeprazole—suitability of omeprazole as a probe for CYP2C19. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb04488.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.