The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of St John's wort and ginseng on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects
Open accessAbstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of St John's wort and ginseng on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Methods: This was an open‐label, three‐way crossover randomized study in 12 healthy male subjects, who received a single 25‐mg dose of warfarin alone or after 14 days’ pretreatment with St John's wort, or 7 days’ pretreatment with ginseng. Dosing with St John's wort or ginseng was continued for 7 days after administration of the warfarin dose. Platelet aggregation, international normalized ratio (INR) of prothrombin time, warfarin enantiomer protein binding, warfarin enantiomer concentrations in plasma and S‐7‐hydroxywarfarin concentration in urine were measured. Statistical comparisons were made using anova and 90% confidence intervals are reported. Results: INR and platelet aggregation were not affected by treatment with St John's wort or ginseng. The apparent clearances of S‐warfarin after warfarin alone or with St John's wort or ginseng were, respectively, 198 ± 38 ml min−1, 270 ± 44 ml min−1 and 220 ± 29 ml min−1. The respective apparent clearances of R‐warfarin were 110 ± 25 ml min−1, 142 ± 29 ml min−1 and 119 ± 20 ml min−1. The mean ratio and 90% confidence interval (CI) of apparent clearance for S‐warfarin was 1.29 (1.16, 1.46) and for R‐warfarin it was 1.23 (1.11, 1.37) when St John's wort was coadministered. The mean ratio and 90% CI of AUC 0−168 of INR was 0.79 (0.70, 0.95) when St John's wort was coadministered. St John's wort and ginseng did not affect the apparent volumes of distribution or protein binding of warfarin enantiomers. Conclusions: St John's wort significantly induced the apparent clearance of both S‐warfarin and R‐warfarin, which in turn resulted in a significant reduction in the pharmacological effect of rac‐warfarin. Coadministration of warfarin with ginseng did not affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of either S‐warfarin or R‐warfarin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of St. John's wort on irinotecan metabolism.
Mathijssen, R. H. J. (2002) · CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment · doi:10.1093/jnci/94.16.1247 · Cited by 457
Pharmacokinetics of sertraline in relation to genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19
Wang, J., Liu, Z., Wang, W., Chen, X., Shu, Y., He, N., & Zhou, H. (2001) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1067/mcp.2001.116513 · Cited by 147
Cited by
Interactions Between Herbal Medicines and Prescribed Drugs: An Updated Systematic Review
Izzo, A. A., & Ernst, E. (2009) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/11317010-000000000-00000 · Cited by 801
Adverse drug reactions in special populations – the elderly
Davies, E. A., & O'Mahony, M. S. (2015) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.12596 · Cited by 604
Gurley, B., Fifer, E., & Gardner, Z. (2012) · Planta Medica · doi:10.1055/s-0031-1298331 · Cited by 165
Clinically based evidence of drug–herb interactions: a systematic review
Kennedy, D. A., & Seely, D. (2010) · Expert Opinion on Drug Safety · doi:10.1517/14740330903405593 · Cited by 116
Elmer, G. W., Lafferty, W. E., Tyree, P. T., & Lind, B. K. (2007) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1345/aph.1k221 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, X., Williams, K. M., Liauw, W. S., Ammit, A. J., Roufogalis, B. D., Duke, C. C., Day, R. O., & McLachlan, A. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02-03
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 592-599
- ISSN
- 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2125
- OpenAlex
- W2026684480
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.