Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions: a population based study

Open access
Wester, Karin, Jönsson, Anna K., Spigset, Olav, Druid, Henrik, Hägg, Staffan·2008·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

What is already known about this subject • Although drugs generally are safe and effective therapies for numerous diseases, adverse drug reactions do occur and may even be fatal. • The incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients has been estimated to be approximately 5%. • In previous studies the incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients has been reported, but the incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions in the general population is largely unknown. What this study adds • Fatal adverse drug reactions account for approximately 3% of all deaths in the general population. • Haemorrhages amount to almost two‐thirds of the fatal adverse drug reactions and antithrombotic agents are implicated in more than half of the suspected fatal adverse drug reactions. • Fatal adverse drug reactions are estimated to be the seventh most common cause of death in Sweden. Aims: To determine the incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions (FADRs) in a Swedish population. Methods: Every seventh randomly selected deceased in three counties in South‐east Sweden during 1 January 2001–31 December 2001 was identified in the Cause of Death Register. Relevant case records (hospitals and/or primary care centres and medicolegal files) were reviewed to identify suspected drug‐related fatalities. Results: Of 1574 deceased study subjects, 49 (3.1%; 95% CI 2.2%, 4.0%) were suspected to have died from FADRs. The most common suspected FADRs were gastrointestinal haemorrhages (n = 18; 37%), central nervous system haemorrhages (n = 14; 29%), cardiovascular disorders (n = 5; 10%), other haemorrhages (n = 4; 8%) and renal dysfunction (n = 3; 6%). The drugs most commonly implicated in FADRs were antithrombotic drugs (n = 31; 63%), followed by nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (n = 9; 18%), antidepressants (n = 7; 14%) and cardiovascular drugs (n = 4; 8%). Of all the 639 fatalities in hospital 41 (6.4%; 95% CI 4.5%, 8.3%) were suspected to be due to FADRs. Conclusions: The medical burden of FADRs is significant. Haemorrhages were seen in a majority of the FADRs; antithrombotic agents or NSAIDs were implicated in most of these events. These results suggest that preventive measures should be taken to reduce the number of deaths caused by drugs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03064.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Wester, K., Jönsson, A. K., Spigset, O., Druid, H., & Hägg, S.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-07
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
573-579
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W2080995941
Cited by
340
References
0
FWCI
19.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions: a population based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03064.x
The paper
Wester, K., Jönsson, A. K., Spigset, O., Druid, H., & Hägg, S. (2008). Incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions: a population based study. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03064.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.