The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delayed drug hypersensitivity: models of T‐cell stimulation
Open accessAbstract
Drug‐induced hypersensitivity reactions can cause a variety of serious diseases by involving drug‐specific T‐cells. Many of these reactions have been explained by the hapten concept, which postulates that small chemical compounds need to bind covalently to proteins to be recognized by the immune system. Due to their chemical reactivity, haptens stimulate the innate immunity by binding covalently to endogenous proteins and form so called hapten‐carrier complexes, which are antigenic and induce T‐cell responses. In recent years, a new concept has been developed since drug‐induced hypersensitivity reactions were also observed with chemically unreactive drugs. This concept implies direct and reversible interactions of the drug between T‐cell receptors (TCR) and major histocompatability complex (MHC) molecules. Therefore it was termed pharmacological interactions with immune receptors (p‐i concept). Early observations on drug reacting T‐cell clones (TCC) let believe that drugs bind first to the T‐cell receptor since HLA molecules could be exchanged without affecting the drug reactivity. However, MHC molecules were always required for full activation of TCC. According to its strong HLA‐B*5701 association, recent data on abacavir suggest that a drug could first bind to the peptide binding groove of the MHC molecule. The thereby modified HLA molecule can then be recognized by specific T‐cells. Consequently, two types of reactions based on the p‐i mechanism may occur: on the one hand, drugs might preferentially bind directly to the TCR, whereas in defined cases with strong HLA association, drugs might bind directly to the MHC molecule.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role of Drug Disposition in Drug Hypersensitivity: A Chemical, Molecular, and Clinical Perspective
Park, B. K., Pirmohamed, M., & Kitteringham, N. R. (1998) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx980058f · Cited by 267
Involvement of Drug-Specific T Cells in Acute Drug-Induced Interstitial Nephritis
Spanou, Z., Keller, M., Britschgi, M., Yawalkar, N., Fehr, T., Neuweiler, J., Gugger, M., Mohaupt, M., & Pichler, W. J. (2006) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2006050418 · Cited by 151
Self-citation
Cited by
Barbaud, A., Collet, E., Milpied, B., Assier, H., Staumont, D., Avenel-Audran, M., Grange, A., Amarger, S., Girardin, P., Guinnepain, M.-T., et al. (2013) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.12125 · Cited by 398
Drug-Induced Acute Interstitial Nephritis
Moledina, D. G., & Perazella, M. A. (2017) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.07630717 · Cited by 133
Mechanisms of Drug-Induced Interstitial Nephritis
Raghavan, R., & Shawar, S. (2017) · Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease · doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2016.11.004 · Cited by 117
(2015) · Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases · Cited by 82
Brink, A., Pähler, A., Funk, C., Schuler, F., & Schadt, S. (2017) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2016.11.018 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Adam, J., Pichler, W. J., & Yerly, D.
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-11
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 701-707
- ISSN
- 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2125
- OpenAlex
- W2138453517
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delayed drug hypersensitivity: models of T‐cell stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03764.x
- The paper
- Adam, J., Pichler, W. J., & Yerly, D. (2011). Delayed drug hypersensitivity: models of T‐cell stimulation. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03764.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.