Cited by 56Diabetes Treatment and ManagementBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Investigation of the haemodynamic effects of exenatide in healthy male subjects

Open access
Mendis, Buddhike, Simpson, Elizabeth, MacDonald, Ian, Mansell, Peter·2012·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Large clinical trials show that chronic use of GLP‐1 agonists cause a fall in blood pressure independent of weight loss. Animal studies have shown acute haemodynamic and vasodilator effects of these drugs. The exact mechanism of the blood pressure drop and acute cardiovascular effects has not been studied in humans. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • This study shows that exenatide also has acute haemodynamic effects in humans. This study demonstrates direct vascular effects and potentially direct cardiac effects. This will enable future studies to look at GLP‐1 agonists as aids in the treatment of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. AIMS In clinical studies of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) agonists used in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes, there is often a small accompanying fall in blood pressure. The mechanism underlying this effect is not known, although exenatide, a GLP‐1 mimetic, has acute regional vasodilator properties in rats. We have therefore studied the haemodynamic effects of exenatide in healthy male volunteers. METHODS We compared the effects of a single 10 µg subcutaneous injection of exenatide with placebo in a double‐blind, randomized, crossover study. For 2 h after dosing, haemodynamic measurements were made using a Finometer, venous occlusion plethysmography and Doppler ultrasound. The urine sodium : creatinine excretion ratio was determined. RESULTS At the end of the study when exenatide was compared with placebo, heart rate had risen by a mean of 8.2 (95% CI 4.2, 12.2, P < 0.01) beats min−1, cardiac output by a mean of 1.2 (95% CI 0.42, 20.3, P < 0.05) l min−1 and total peripheral resistance had fallen by 120 (95% CI −8, −233, P < 0.05) dyn s cm−5.There were no differences in blood pressure. The urinary sodium : creatinine ratio was increased by mean 12.4 (95% CI 4.6, 20.2, P < 0.05) mmol mmol−1 when exenatide was compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS Exenatide has significant haemodynamic effects in healthy volunteers. The results of this study are consistent with exenatide having both vasodilator and natriuretic properties. The vascular changes may contribute to the hypotensive effect of exenatide when used chronically in patients with diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04214.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several clinical mechanistic trials provided conflicting evidence on GLP-1RA-induced heart rate increase.

    “Several clinical mechanistic trials provided conflicting evidence while aiming to understand the GLP-1RA-induced heart rate-increase.”

    From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [105]

  • Some studies found systemic vasodilation (with likely consequent reflex tachycardia), while others failed to show this.

    “Some studies found systemic vasodilation (with likely consequent reflex tachycardia), while others failed to show this”

    From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [105]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendis, B., Simpson, E., MacDonald, I., & Mansell, P.
Affiliations
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Mendis, Buddhike
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-06
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
437-444
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W1483014275
Cited by
56
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, hemodynamics, vasodilation, blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, sodium excretion, type 2 diabetes
MeSH terms
Exenatide, Adult, Blood Pressure, Cardiac Output, Creatinine, Double-Blind Method, Heart Rate, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Peptides, Plethysmography, Sodium, Vascular Resistance, Venoms, Cross-Over Studies, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review