Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The thickness of the epidermis

WHITTON, JUDI T., EVERALL, J.D.·1973·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Epidermal thickness has been accurately measured on 214 samples of skin from 188 volunteers. Variations with the individual, body site, sex and age are described and discussed. An original technique of measurement has been developed which has several advantages over conventional methods. In particular, quick straight‐forward measurements are possible on volunteer skin rather than post mortem material, and the method eliminates errors arising from the skin's elasticity. These improvements in accuracy have confirmed that much information in the literature on epidermal thickness, is misleading as the results are based on inaccurate techniques of measurement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1973.tb03007.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
WHITTON, J. T., & EVERALL, J. D.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
1973-11
Volume
89
Issue
5
Pages
467-476
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W2114056631
Cited by
271
References
0
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The thickness of the epidermis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1973.tb03007.x
The paper
WHITTON, J. T., & EVERALL, J. D. (1973). The thickness of the epidermis. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1973.tb03007.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.