The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Isotretinoin for acne vulgaris-10 years later; a safe and successful treatment
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term benefit of isotretinoin in otherwise therapy-resistant acne. We also assessed risk factors which might influence the long-term outcome. We studied 88 patients (mean age 20.8 years), most of whom had suffered from acne for many years (mean 7.4 years). They received isotretinoin in an initial dose of 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg/day. The dose was subsequently adjusted according to response and side-effects. Most patients only required 4 months' therapy to produce at least 85% clinical improvement. The patients were seen up to 10 years post-therapy (mean 9 years). Sixty-one patients were still virtually clear of disease. Of the others, 16% required further treatment with conventional antibiotics and 23% required a second course of isotretinoin. Of those who relapsed, 96% did so within 3 years of stopping therapy. The patients' age, sex, and duration of acne did not influence outcome. However, in patients with predominantly truncal acne, especially when severe, there was an increased incidence of relapse. Sebum excretion is known to correlate with acne severity, but the long-term degree of sebum suppression was found not to be related to relapse. The dose schedule, in particular cumulative dose, was an important factor in determining relapse rate. Those patients who received 0.5 mg/kg daily, or a cumulative dose of < 120 mg/kg, had a significantly higher relapse rate than patients receiving a larger dose. We did not elicit any long-term systemic or biochemical side-effects. We conclude that isotretinoin is a safe and effective therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris
Zaenglein, A. L., Pathy, A. L., Schlosser, B. J., Alikhan, A., Baldwin, H. E., Berson, D. S., Bowe, W. P., Graber, E. M., Harper, J. C., Kang, S., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.037 · Cited by 1,597
Haider, A. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.6.726 · Cited by 273
James, W. D. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp033487 · Cited by 269
Lee, J. W., Yoo, K. H., Park, K. Y., Han, T. Y., Li, K., Seo, S. J., & Hong, C. K. (2011) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10152.x · Cited by 127
Isotretinoin use and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study
Alhusayen, R. O., Juurlink, D. N., Mamdani, M. M., Morrow, R. L., Shear, N. H., & Dormuth, C. R. (2013) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2012.387 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- LAYTON, A. M., KNAGGS, H., TAYLOR, J., & CUNLIFFE, W. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 292-296
- ISSN
- 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074985483
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isotretinoin for acne vulgaris-10 years later; a safe and successful treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1993.tb11849.x
- The paper
- LAYTON, A. M., KNAGGS, H., TAYLOR, J., & CUNLIFFE, W. J. (1993). Isotretinoin for acne vulgaris-10 years later; a safe and successful treatment. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1993.tb11849.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.