The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endothelin-1 could be one of the targets of psoriasis therapy
Abstract
Sir, All current treatments for psoriasis have limitations, particularly for severely affected patients. The pathogenesis of this inflammatory skin disorder that may affect about 1–3% of the world population1 is still under debate. One of the principal clinical aspects of psoriasis is the hyperproliferation of keratinocytes in some skin areas via the action of inflammatory mediators. Controlling this upregulated growth would be a very attractive therapy even if the causative agent(s) of the disease cannot be blocked. The active vitamin D3 analogues tacalcitol, calcipotriol and maxacalcitol are examples of an effective treatment which addresses keratinocyte hyperproliferation2 without affecting the underlying cause of the disease. Keratinocytes can produce cytokines and growth factors, and some of these can stimulate cell proliferation through an autocrine loop. Several years ago it was reported by our group that endothelin (ET)‐1 is produced in keratinocytes and acts through the ETA receptor as an autocrine growth factor for these cells.3 ETs are a family of three vasoactive peptides, termed ET‐1, ET‐2 and ET‐3, which induce their biological actions through at least two major receptor subtypes that belong to the family of G‐protein coupled receptors: a selective ETA receptor, which binds ET‐1 and ET‐2 with high affinity and ET‐3 with low affinity, and a nonselective ETB receptor which binds all ET isopeptides with equal affinity. It has recently been reported that compounds t…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The mitogenic signalling of endothelin-1 (ET-1), a specific ligand of the G protein-coupled endothelin receptor (ETA), was demonstrated to be enhanced by HPV-16 E5 binding to ETA in growth factor-starved keratinocytes, leading to keratinocyte proliferation”
From The Not-So-Good, the Bad and the Ugly: HPV E5, E6 and E7 Oncoproteins in the Orchestration of Carcinogenesis (2021) · cites this paper as [216]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1056/NEJM199503023320907 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0923-1811(02)00136-6 · DOI
- 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1473 · DOI
- Venuti A, 2000, FASEB J, 14, 2277, 10.1096/fj.00-0024com · DOI
- Bagnato A, 2002, Cancer Res, 62, 6381
- Bonifati C, 1997, Int J Immunopath Ph, 10, 81
- 10.1080/00015559850135779 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.129.3.853 · DOI
- Salani D, 2002, Clin Sci, 48, S318, 10.1042/CS103S318S · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.176 · DOI
- Pernet I, 2000, Exp Dermatol, 9, 401, 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2000.009006401.x · DOI
Cited by
Basukala, O., & Banks, L. (2021) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v13101892 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- SIMEONE, P., TESON, M., LATINI, A., CARDUCCI, M., & VENUTI, A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1273-1275
- ISSN
- 0007-0963
- 1365-2133
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review