Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Endothelin-1 could be one of the targets of psoriasis therapy

SIMEONE, P., TESON, M., LATINI, A., CARDUCCI, M., VENUTI, A.·2004·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Sir, All current treatments for psoriasis have limitations, particularly for severely affected patients. The pathogenesis of this inflammatory skin disorder that may affect about 1–3% of the world population1 is still under debate. One of the principal clinical aspects of psoriasis is the hyperproliferation of keratinocytes in some skin areas via the action of inflammatory mediators. Controlling this upregulated growth would be a very attractive therapy even if the causative agent(s) of the disease cannot be blocked. The active vitamin D3 analogues tacalcitol, calcipotriol and maxacalcitol are examples of an effective treatment which addresses keratinocyte hyperproliferation2 without affecting the underlying cause of the disease. Keratinocytes can produce cytokines and growth factors, and some of these can stimulate cell proliferation through an autocrine loop. Several years ago it was reported by our group that endothelin (ET)‐1 is produced in keratinocytes and acts through the ETA receptor as an autocrine growth factor for these cells.3 ETs are a family of three vasoactive peptides, termed ET‐1, ET‐2 and ET‐3, which induce their biological actions through at least two major receptor subtypes that belong to the family of G‐protein coupled receptors: a selective ETA receptor, which binds ET‐1 and ET‐2 with high affinity and ET‐3 with low affinity, and a nonselective ETB receptor which binds all ET isopeptides with equal affinity. It has recently been reported that compounds t…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06277.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1056/NEJM199503023320907 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0923-1811(02)00136-6 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1473 · DOI
  4. Venuti A, 2000, FASEB J, 14, 2277, 10.1096/fj.00-0024com · DOI
  5. Bagnato A, 2002, Cancer Res, 62, 6381
  6. Bonifati C, 1997, Int J Immunopath Ph, 10, 81
  7. 10.1080/00015559850135779 · DOI
  8. 10.1083/jcb.129.3.853 · DOI
  9. Salani D, 2002, Clin Sci, 48, S318, 10.1042/CS103S318S · DOI
  10. 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.176 · DOI
  11. Pernet I, 2000, Exp Dermatol, 9, 401, 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2000.009006401.x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
SIMEONE, P., TESON, M., LATINI, A., CARDUCCI, M., & VENUTI, A.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2004-12
Volume
151
Issue
6
Pages
1273-1275
ISSN
  • 0007-0963
  • 1365-2133
Cited by
14
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review