Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 693

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A global phase III randomized controlled trial of etanercept in psoriasis: safety, efficacy, and effect of dose reduction

Papp, K.A., Tyring, S., Lahfa, M., Prinz, J., Griffiths, C.E.M., Nakanishi, A.M., Zitnik, R., van de Kerkhof, P.C.M., the Etanercept Psoriasis Study Group·2005·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In previous studies, etanercept significantly improved plaque psoriasis and was well tolerated. OBJECTIVES: To examine further the efficacy and safety of etanercept and to assess maintenance of treatment effect after dose reduction of etanercept. METHODS: In this multicentre 24-week study in the U.S.A., Canada and Western Europe, patients were at least 18 years old; had active, clinically stable plaque psoriasis involving at least 10% of body surface area; had a minimum Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) of 10 at screening; and had received or were a candidate to receive systemic psoriasis therapy or phototherapy. During the first 12 weeks of the study, patients were randomly assigned to receive by subcutaneous injection etanercept twice weekly (BIW) at a dose of 50 mg or 25 mg, or placebo BIW in a double-blind fashion. During the second 12 weeks, all patients received etanercept 25 mg BIW. The primary endpoint was a 75% or greater improvement from baseline in PASI (PASI 75) at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty-three subjects were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug. At week 12, a PASI 75 was achieved by 49% of patients in the etanercept 50 mg BIW group, 34% in the 25 mg BIW group, and 3% in the placebo group (P < 0.0001 for each etanercept group compared with placebo). At week 24 (after 12 weeks of open-label 25 mg etanercept BIW), a PASI 75 was achieved by 54% of patients whose dose was reduced from 50 mg BIW to 25 mg BIW, by 45% of patients in the continuous 25 mg BIW group, and by 28% in the group that received placebo followed by etanercept 25 mg BIW. Etanercept was well tolerated throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept provided clinically meaningful benefit to patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, with no apparent decrease in efficacy after dose reduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06688.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 693

Metadata

Authors
Papp, K. A., Tyring, S., Lahfa, M., Prinz, J., Griffiths, C. E. M., Nakanishi, A. M., Zitnik, R., van de Kerkhof, P. C. M., & the Etanercept Psoriasis Study Group
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2005-06
Volume
152
Issue
6
Pages
1304-1312
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W2146843653
Cited by
693
References
0
FWCI
13.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A global phase III randomized controlled trial of etanercept in psoriasis: safety, efficacy, and effect of dose reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06688.x
The paper
Papp, K. A., Tyring, S., Lahfa, M., Prinz, J., Griffiths, C. E. M., Nakanishi, A. M., Zitnik, R., van de Kerkhof, P. C. M., & the Etanercept Psoriasis Study Group. (2005). A global phase III randomized controlled trial of etanercept in psoriasis: safety, efficacy, and effect of dose reduction. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06688.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.