Cited by 834Psoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisDermatology and Skin DiseasesSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments

Comparison of ixekizumab with etanercept or placebo in moderate-to-severe psoriasis (UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3): results from two phase 3 randomised trials

Griffiths, Christopher E M, Reich, Kristian, Lebwohl, Mark, van de Kerkhof, Peter, Paul, Carle, Menter, Alan, Cameron, Gregory S, Erickson, Janelle +8 more·2015·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Ixekizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody against the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin 17A. We report two studies of ixekizumab compared with placebo or etanercept to assess the safety and efficacy of specifically targeting interleukin 17A in patients with widespread moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods In two prospective, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 studies (UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3), eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had a confirmed diagnosis of chronic plaque psoriasis at least 6 months before baseline (randomisation), 10% or greater body-surface area involvement at both screening and baseline visits, at least a moderate clinical severity as measured by a static physician global assessment (sPGA) score of 3 or more, and a psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score of 12. Participants were randomly assigned (1:2:2:2) by computer-generated random sequence with an interactive voice response system to receive subcutaneous placebo, etanercept (50 mg twice weekly), or one injection of 80 mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks, or every 4 weeks after a 160 mg starting dose. Blinding was maintained with a double-dummy design. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were proportions of patients achieving sPGA score 0 or 1 and 75% or greater improvement in PASI at week 12. Analysis was by intention to treat. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01597245 and NCT01646177. Findings Between May 30, 2012, and Dec 30, 2013, 1224 patients in UNCOVER-2 were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous placebo (n=168), etanercept (n=358), or ixekizumab every 2 weeks (n=351) or every 4 weeks (n=347); between Aug 11, 2012, and Feb 27, 2014, 1346 patients in UNCOVER-3 were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=193), etanercept (n=382), ixekizumab every 2 weeks (n=385), or ixekizumab every 4 weeks (n=386). At week 12, both primary endpoints were met in both studies. For UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 respectively, in the ixekizumab every 2 weeks group, PASI 75 was achieved by 315 (response rate 89·7%; [effect size 87·4% (97·5% CI 82·9-91·8) vs placebo; 48·1% (41·2-55·0) vs etanercept]) and 336 (87·3%; [80·0% (74·4-85·7) vs placebo; 33·9% (27·0-40·7) vs etanercept]) patients; in the ixekizumab every 4 weeks group, by 269 (77·5%; [75·1% (69·5-80·8) vs placebo; 35·9% (28·2-43·6) vs etanercept]) and 325 (84·2%; [76·9% (71·0-82·8) vs placebo; 30·8% (23·7-37·9) vs etanercept]) patients; in the placebo group, by four (2·4%) and 14 (7·3%) patients; and in the etanercept group by 149 (41·6%) and 204 (53·4%) patients (all p<0·0001 vs placebo or etanercept). In the ixekizumab every 2 weeks group, sPGA 0/1 was achieved by 292 (response rate 83·2%; [effect size 80·8% (97·5% CI 75·6-86·0) vs placebo; 47·2% (39·9-54·4) vs etanercept]) and 310 (80·5%; [73·8% (67·7-79·9) vs placebo; 38·9% (31·7-46·1) vs etanercept]) patients; in the ixekizumab every 4 weeks group by 253 (72·9%; [70·5% (64·6-76·5) vs placebo; 36·9% (29·1-44·7) vs etanercept]) and 291 (75·4%; [68·7% (62·3-75·0) vs placebo; 33·8% (26·3-41·3) vs etanercept]) patients; in the placebo group by four (2·4%) and 13 (6·7%) patients; and in the etanercept group by 129 (36·0%) and 159 (41·6%) patients (all p<0·0001 vs placebo or etanercept). In combined studies, serious adverse events were reported in 14 (1·9%) of 734 patients given ixekizumab every 2 weeks, 14 (1·9%) of 729 given ixekizumab every 4 weeks, seven (1·9%) of 360 given placebo, and 14 (1·9%) of 739 given etanercept; no deaths were noted. Interpretation Both ixekizumab dose regimens had greater efficacy than placebo and etanercept over 12 weeks in two independent studies. These studies show that selectively neutralising interleukin 17A with a high affinity antibody potentially gives patients with psoriasis a new and effective biological therapy option. Funding Eli Lilly and Co.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60125-8

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expression of IL-10 and co-inhibitory molecules marks a general anti-inflammatory module that can be induced by IL-27 in any T cell subset.

    “Conversely, expression of IL-10 and co-inhibitory molecules marks a general anti-inflammatory module that can be induced by IL-27 in any T cell subset [105, 178–180].”

    From TH17 cell heterogeneity and its role in tissue inflammation (2023) · cites this paper as [105]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griffiths, C. E. M., Reich, K., Lebwohl, M., van de Kerkhof, P., Paul, C., Menter, A., Cameron, G. S., Erickson, J., Zhang, L., Secrest, R. J., Ball, S., Braun, D. K., Osuntokun, O. O., Heffernan, M. P., Nickoloff, B. J., & Papp, K.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • Dermatologikum Hamburg (DE)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Probity Medical Research (CA)
Corresponding author
Griffiths, Christopher E M
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
386
Issue
9993
Pages
541-551
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2171889601
Cited by
834
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 107 · 2017: 120 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 29 · 2013: 1
FWCI
57.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Keywords
etanercept, psoriasis, IL-17A, IL-17A inhibition, monoclonal antibodies, plaque psoriasis, treatment efficacy, treatment safety, adverse events, PASI improvement, double-dummy design, dosing interval, biologic therapy
MeSH terms
Etanercept, Adult, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Chronic Disease, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psoriasis, Treatment Outcome, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review