Cited by 64Hair Growth and DisordersDermatoglyphics and Human Traitsmelanin and skin pigmentation

Ethnic characteristics of eyelashes: a comparative analysis in Asian and Caucasian females: Eyelashes in Asian and Caucasian females

Na, J.I., Kwon, O.S., Kim, B.J., Park, W.S., Oh, J.K., Kim, K.H., Cho, K.H., Eun, H.C.·2006·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite similar biochemical composition of human hair between races, physico-morphological characteristics are not identical in different ethnic groups. Eyelashes have been investigated far less than scalp hair, and the information available is insufficient. OBJECTIVES: To obtain basic information about eyelashes and to clarify differences between female eyelashes in Asians and Caucasians. METHODS: Twenty Asian and 10 white Caucasian female volunteers aged between 20 and 29 years were admitted to the study. Lateral digital photographs of upper eyelashes were taken and curl-up and lift-up angles of upper eyelashes were measured from lateral views. Images of upper eyelashes were also taken using the phototrichogram technique and total numbers, lengths and thicknesses of upper eyelashes were obtained (a total of 4661 eyelashes; 2946 for Asian, 1715 for Caucasian). The central portion of the eyelashes or whole eyelashes were clipped and images were taken immediately and 7 days later to obtain the growth rate and anagen ratio of upper eyelashes. Numbers and thickness of eyelash cuticular layers were obtained by electron microscopy. RESULTS: Compared with Caucasians, Asian eyelashes revealed lower lift-up and curl-up angles, fewer numbers and a thicker transverse diameter. However, no statistical difference was observed in length or growth rate. Duration of anagen was estimated at about 2 months. The eyelash anagen ratio obtained from five Asians was 17.8 +/- 3.3%. By electron microscopy, the number of cuticular layers in transverse section was greater in Asian (8.0 +/- 1.2) than Caucasian females (6.5 +/- 1.1), but no statistical difference was found in single cuticle layer thickness between the two groups. Moreover, eyelash characteristics were not influenced by eye makeup in either race. CONCLUSIONS: Our results on eyelash morphology and growth characteristics demonstrated significant ethnic differences in Asian and Caucasian females that could provide basic information for future investigations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07495.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Na, J. I., Kwon, O. S., Kim, B. J., Park, W. S., Oh, J. K., Kim, K. H., Cho, K. H., & Eun, H. C.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kwon, O.S.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2006-08-30
Volume
155
Issue
6
Pages
1170-1176
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037299276
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Amorepacific Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Dermatoglyphics and Human Traits
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
eyelashes, ethnic differences, cuticular layer, eye makeup
MeSH terms
Adult, Eyelashes, Female, Humans, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, White People, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review