Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Incidence of skin cancers in 3867 patients treated with narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy

Hearn, R.M.R., Kerr, A.C., Rahim, K.F., Ferguson, J., Dawe, R.S.·2008·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy is a widely used treatment. Psoralen-UVA photochemotherapy (PUVA) increases skin cancer risk and some animal studies have raised the possibility of an increased risk with NB-UVB. The risk of skin cancer in humans following treatment with NB-UVB is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This current analysis forms part of an ongoing study ultimately aiming to define the long-term carcinogenic risk of NB-UVB treatment in humans. METHODS: Details of all patients receiving NB-UVB treatment until 31/12/2002 in Tayside, Scotland, were accessed from a treatment database and linked to the Scottish Cancer Registry. Indirect standardization was used to compare skin cancer incidence in the study population with age and sex matched cancer registry data for the Tayside population. We also assessed the effect of NB-UVB exposure treatment numbers on the risk of developing skin cancer. RESULTS: Of 4690 records reviewed, 4665 were suitable for analysis with 3886 records linked with the cancer registry and 3867 followed-up for at least 6 months before 31/12/02 (the date at which cancer registration was deemed to be complete). The median number of NB-UVB treatments was 29 with 352 patients receiving > or = 100 treatments. The study gave 24,753 person-years of follow up. First skin cancers recorded in study patients were 27 basal cell carcinomas (BCC), seven squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and six melanomas. No association was found between NB-UVB exposure alone (without PUVA) and any skin cancer. For NB-UVB and PUVA treated patients there was an association with BCC, with 27 BCCs found compared with 14.1 expected in the matched population. CONCLUSION: We found no significant association between NB-UVB treatment and BCC, SCC or melanoma. There was a small increase in BCCs amongst those also treated with PUVA. These reassuring results do not demonstrate the early increase in skin cancers that was found associated with PUVA treatment. However, cautious interpretation is required as the cohort contained relatively few patients who had a high treatment number and because the slow evolution of skin cancers may result in a delayed incidence peak. Ongoing risk assessment is therefore essential.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08776.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Hearn, R. M. R., Kerr, A. C., Rahim, K. F., Ferguson, J., & Dawe, R. S.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2008-10
Volume
159
Issue
4
Pages
931-935
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W2109745257
Cited by
332
References
0
FWCI
13.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of skin cancers in 3867 patients treated with narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08776.x
The paper
Hearn, R. M. R., Kerr, A. C., Rahim, K. F., Ferguson, J., & Dawe, R. S. (2008). Incidence of skin cancers in 3867 patients treated with narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08776.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.