The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hand eczema and quality of life: a population-based study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is a common disease in the population and is of interest from a public health perspective. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is increasingly being measured in dermatology. OBJECTIVES: To investigate HRQoL in relation to hand eczema in the general population. METHODS: In the Public Health Survey of Stockholm County Council 2006, a questionnaire was sent to 57 009 randomly selected individuals aged 18-84 years. The response rate among persons of working age (18-64 years) was 58%. The questionnaire included a validated question concerning hand eczema and a generic instrument for measurement of HRQoL, the EQ-5D. RESULTS: The proportion of individuals reporting problems was significantly larger among those with than without hand eczema in all five dimensions of the EQ-5D. Gender differences were found in some age subgroups. The EQ-5D index was lower for individuals with hand eczema than for those without, and on the same level as for psoriasis and asthma. Beta regression showed that the strongest confounding factors were low back pain, depression and hay fever/asthma. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL was negatively affected in individuals with hand eczema irrespective of age. With the EQ-5D instrument it is also possible to detect certain gender differences. The EQ-5D index for hand eczema was of the same size as for psoriasis and asthma, all common diseases with an impact on public health. It is of importance to acknowledge the influence of hand eczema on daily life, in order to give the patients good care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A better lemon squeezer? maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables.
Smithson, M., & Verkuilen, J. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.1.54 · Cited by 1,788
Cited by
Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of hand eczema
Thyssen, J. P., Schuttelaar, M. L. A., Alfonso, J. H., Andersen, K. E., Angelova‐Fischer, I., Arents, B. W. M., Bauer, A., Brans, R., Cannavo, A., Christoffers, W. A., et al. (2022) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/cod.14035 · Cited by 282
Boehm, D., Schmid‐Ott, G., Finkeldey, F., John, S. M., Dwinger, C., Werfel, T., Diepgen, T. L., & Breuer, K. (2012) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02062.x · Cited by 116
Fortino, V., Wisgrill, L., Werner, P., Suomela, S., Linder, N., Jalonen, E., Suomalainen, A., Marwah, V., Kero, M., Pesonen, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2009192117 · Cited by 99
Westwood, M., Ramaekers, B., Lang, S., Armstrong, N., Noake, C., de Kock, S., Joore, M., Severens, J., & Kleijnen, J. (2016) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta20670 · Cited by 49
Simonsen, A. B., Ruge, I. F., Quaade, A. S., Johansen, J. D., Thyssen, J. P., & Zachariae, C. (2021) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/cod.13727 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Moberg, C., Alderling, M., & Meding, B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 397-403
- ISSN
- 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2133
- OpenAlex
- W2036492289
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hand eczema and quality of life: a population-based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09099.x
- The paper
- Moberg, C., Alderling, M., & Meding, B. (2009). Hand eczema and quality of life: a population-based study. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09099.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.