The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Open trial of ciclosporin treatment for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Ciclosporin for SJS and TEN
Abstract
Background Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)are acute mucocutaneous reactions associated with poor prognosis. The treatment is mainly symptomatic, based on supportive care. Until now, several curative treatments have been proposed without evidence of effectiveness.Objectives To evaluate the effect of ciclosporin on SJS and TEN after a short series had suggested a benefit.Methods We conducted an open, phase II trial to determine the safety and possible benefit of ciclosporin. Among the 45 consecutive patients admitted for SJS /TEN from March 2005 to September 2007, 29 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Ciclosporin was administered orally (3 mg kg)1 daily for 10 days) and tapered over a month. Clinical and biological evaluations were performed sequentially. Predicted death rate was estimated with a validated prognostic score (SCORTEN).Results Twenty-nine patients were included at a mean +/- SD of 2.8 +/- 1.8 days after onset. The final diagnosis was SJS (n = 10), SJS ⁄TEN overlap (n = 12) and TEN(n = 7). One month of treatment was completed in 26. Ciclosporin was stopped after more than 10 days in three cases for side-effects including posterior leucoencephalopathy (n = 1), neutropenia (n = 1) and nosocomial pneumopathy(n = 1). Ciclosporin dosage was tapered earlier than scheduled in two cases for alteration in renal function. The prognostic score predicted 2.75 deaths; none occurred (P = 0.1). Mean epidermal detachment remained stable in 18 of 29 cases (62%). The mean ± SD hospital stay was 16.2 +/- 9.1 days.Conclusions Both the death rate and the progression of detachment seemed lower than expected, suggesting a possible usefulness of ciclosporin in SJS and TEN that needs to be confirmed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Current perspectives on severe drug eruption
Zhang, J., Lei, Z., Xu, C., Zhao, J., & Kang, X. (2021) · Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology · doi:10.1007/s12016-021-08859-0 · Cited by 60
Mechanisms of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury
Uetrecht, J. (2019) · Advances in pharmacology · doi:10.1016/bs.apha.2018.12.001 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Valeyrie-Allanore, L., Wolkenstein, P., Brochard, L., Ortonne, N., Maître, B., Revuz, J., Bagot, M., & Roujeau, J. C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-05-25
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 847-853
- ISSN
- 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1902133606
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open trial of ciclosporin treatment for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Ciclosporin for SJS and TEN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09863.x
- The paper
- Valeyrie-Allanore, L., Wolkenstein, P., Brochard, L., Ortonne, N., Maître, B., Revuz, J., Bagot, M., & Roujeau, J. C. (2010). Open trial of ciclosporin treatment for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Ciclosporin for SJS and TEN. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09863.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.