Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Horne, AnnaCarin, Janka, Gritta, Maarten Egeler, R., Gadner, Helmut, Imashuku, Shinsaku, Ladisch, Stephan, Locatelli, Franco, Montgomery, Scott M., Webb, David, Winiarski, Jacek, Filipovich, Alexandra H., Henter, Jan‐Inge, the Histiocyte Society·2005·British Journal of Haematology

Abstract

Summary: Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) poses major therapeutic challenges, and the primary inherited form, familial haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (FHL), is usually fatal. We evaluated, including Cox regression analysis, survival in 86 children (29 familial) that received HLH‐94‐therapy (etoposide, dexamethasone, ciclosporin) followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) between 1995 and 2000. The overall estimated 3‐year‐survival post‐SCT was 64% [confidence interval (CI) = ±10%] (n = 86); 71 ± 18% in those patients with a matched related donor (MRD, n = 24), 70 ± 16% with a matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 33), 50 ± 24% with a family haploidentical donor (haploidentical, n = 16), and 54 ± 27% with a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD, n = 13). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, estimated odds ratios (OR) for mortality were 1·93 (CI =0·61–6·19) for MUD, 3·31 (1·02–10·76) for haploidentical, and 3·01 (0·91–9·97) for MMUD, compared with MRD. In children with active disease after 2‐months of therapy (n = 43) the OR was 2·75 (1·26–5·99), compared with inactive disease (n = 43). In children with active disease at SCT (n = 37), the OR was 1·80 (0·80–4·06) compared with inactive disease (n = 49), after adjustment for disease activity at 2‐months. Mortality was predominantly transplant‐related. Most HLH patients survived SCT using MRD or MUD, and survival with partially mismatched donors was also acceptable. Patients that responded well to initial pretransplant‐induction therapy fared best, but some persisting HLH activity should not automatically preclude performing SCT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05501.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Horne, A., Janka, G., Maarten Egeler, R., Gadner, H., Imashuku, S., Ladisch, S., Locatelli, F., Montgomery, S. M., Webb, D., Winiarski, J., Filipovich, A. H., Henter, J., & the Histiocyte Society
Venue
British Journal of Haematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05-23
Volume
129
Issue
5
Pages
622-630
ISSN
  • 0007-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2141
OpenAlex
W2088419428
Cited by
235
References
0
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05501.x
The paper
Horne, A., Janka, G., Maarten Egeler, R., Gadner, H., Imashuku, S., Ladisch, S., Locatelli, F., Montgomery, S. M., Webb, D., Winiarski, J., Filipovich, A. H., Henter, J., & the Histiocyte Society. (2005). Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. British Journal of Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05501.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.