Cited by 124Social Work Education and PracticeChild Welfare and AdoptionGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Factors that contribute to high turnover among residential child care staff

Colton, Matthew, Roberts, Susan·2007·Child & Family Social Work

Abstract

In this paper we draw on our own empirical research and that of others to consider the factors that contribute to high staff turnover in residential child care. First, we focus on the problem of retaining staff in children’s services. Second, we turn our attention to the factors that contribute to staff turnover in residential care: namely, perceptions of the service; of children and young people; and of human resource issues. Third, we attempt to draw out the implications of high turnover for policy and practice. The negative image of residential care has persisted in the wake of a plethora of abuse scandals. The increasing emotional and behavioural problems presented by the children cared for, and the violence and verbal abuse directed at staff are key retention issues. Moreover, poor conditions of employment contribute to staff perceptions of the work as a short‐term career choice only. The potential means of resolving these problems are explored, and the future research agenda highlighted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00451.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many group care providers are not adequately prepared or supported to meet the developmental and relational needs of the youth they serve.

    “Yet, many group care providers are not adequately prepared or supported to meet the developmental and relational needs of the youth they serve (Colton and Roberts 2007; Hoagwood et al. 2001; Kakuma et al. 2011).”
  • Serious behavioral problems and complex trauma are often prevalent within the group care population.

    “In order to improve care quality and reduce the risk for their children and staff, agencies must insure that staff are well-supported and prepared to deal with the serious behavioral problems and complex trauma often prevalent within this population (Colton & Roberts, 2007;Kakuma et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colton, M., & Roberts, S.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Susan
Venue
Child & Family Social Work
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-10-24
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
133-142
ISSN
  • 1356-7500 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2206
OpenAlex
W2071470773
Cited by
124
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Child & Family Social Work (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
employee turnover, residential care for children, employee retention, children's services, abuse scandals, violence against staff, verbal abuse, working conditions, career choice, human resource management, perceptions of work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review