Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Appraisal of skin tests with food extracts for diagnosis of food hypersensitivity

BOCK, S. A., LEE, W.‐Y., REMIGIO, L., HOLST, A., MAY, C. D.·1978·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Summary: Seventy‐six children aged 5 months to 15 years who exhibited a net weal of 3.0 mm or greater to a puncture skin test with one or more of fourteen foods were subjected to double‐blind food challenge. Confirmed reactions to double‐blind food challenge were found to occur only with peanut, milk, egg and soybean. Puncture skin tests with 1:20 w/v concentration of food extracts identified all subjects who exhibited an adverse reaction during the double‐blind food challenge. Performance of intradermal skin tests did not identify any additional subjects who reacted clinically to double‐blind food challenge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1978.tb01509.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
BOCK, S. A., LEE, W. ‐., REMIGIO, L., HOLST, A., & MAY, C. D.
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-11
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
559-564
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W2113223805
Cited by
177
References
0
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Appraisal of skin tests with food extracts for diagnosis of food hypersensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1978.tb01509.x
The paper
BOCK, S. A., LEE, W. ‐., REMIGIO, L., HOLST, A., & MAY, C. D. (1978). Appraisal of skin tests with food extracts for diagnosis of food hypersensitivity. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1978.tb01509.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.