The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The use of exhaled nitric oxide concentration to identify eosinophilic airway inflammation: an observational study in adults with asthma
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Background Assessment of eosinophilic airway inflammation may be helpful in the management of asthma. Nitric oxide (NO) has potential advantages as a tool to monitor airway inflammation although little is known about the relationship between NO and eosinophilic airway inflammation and the factors which influence it. Methods We set out to define the relationship between exhaled NO and the sputum eosinophil count, identify the exhaled NO concentration that best identified a sputum eosinophil count >3% and investigate the impact of several potential confounding factors in 566 consecutive patients with varying severity of asthma. Finally we examined the ability of exhaled NO concentrations measured at differing exhalation flows to identify the presence of a sputum eosinophilia. Results We found a significant positive relationship between exhaled NO and sputum eosinophil count (R2=0.26, P<0.001) which was best described using a non‐linear model. There were no clinically important confounding factors to this model. In non‐smokers an exhaled NO concentration of >8.3 p.p.b. at 250 mL/s gave 71% sensitivity and 72% specificity for identifying a sputum eosinophil count of >3%. Conclusions This value of exhaled NO would seem to be the best for identifying significant eosinophilic airway inflammation. It is applicable to a wide range of non‐smoking patients with asthma; exhalation flow does not alter the ability of exhaled NO concentration to detect a sputum eosinophilia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dweik, R. A., Boggs, P. B., Erzurum, S. C., Irvin, C. G., Leigh, M. W., Lundberg, J. O., Olin, A.-C., Plummer, A. L., & Taylor, D. R. (2011) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.9120-11st · Cited by 2,539
Reddel, H. K., Taylor, D. R., Bateman, E. D., Boulet, L.-P., Boushey, H. A., Busse, W. W., Casale, T. B., Chanez, P., Enright, P. L., Gibson, P. G., et al. (2009) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200801-060st · Cited by 1,918
Self-citationAfter asthma: redefining airways diseases
Pavord, I. D., Beasley, R., Agusti, A., Anderson, G. P., Bel, E., Brusselle, G., Cullinan, P., Custovic, A., Ducharme, F. M., Fahy, J. V., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30879-6 · Cited by 1,073
Self-citationAsthma: defining of the persistent adult phenotypes
Wenzel, S. E. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69290-8 · Cited by 1,043
Diagnosis and treatment of asthma in childhood: a PRACTALL consensus report
Bacharier, L. B., Boner, A., Carlsen, K. ‐., Eigenmann, P. A., Frischer, T., Götz, M., Helms, P. J., Hunt, J., Liu, A., Papadopoulos, N., et al. (2008) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01586.x · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Berry, M. A., Shaw, D. E., Green, R. H., Brightling, C. E., Wardlaw, A. J., & Pavord, I. D.
- Venue
- Clinical & Experimental Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1175-1179
- ISSN
- 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2156136186
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use of exhaled nitric oxide concentration to identify eosinophilic airway inflammation: an observational study in adults with asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02314.x
- The paper
- Berry, M. A., Shaw, D. E., Green, R. H., Brightling, C. E., Wardlaw, A. J., & Pavord, I. D. (2005). The use of exhaled nitric oxide concentration to identify eosinophilic airway inflammation: an observational study in adults with asthma. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02314.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.