Cited by 15Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationAsthma and respiratory diseasesFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research

Vaccinations, infections and antibacterials in the first grass pollen season of life and risk of later hayfever

Open access
Bremner, S. A., Carey, I. M., DeWilde, S., Richards, N., Maier, W. C., Hilton, S. R., Strachan, D. P., Cook, D. G.·2007·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that early-life exposure to vaccinations, infections or antibacterials influence allergic disease development. Concurrent exposure to grass pollens may alter any effect. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that exposure to antibacterials, vaccinations (DTP or MMR) or specific infections during the first grass pollen seasons of life influences the risk of hayfever more than at any other time of the year. METHODS: Nested case-control studies were based on birth cohorts within two large databases of computerized patient records from UK general practices: the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) and Doctors' Independent Network (DIN). Seven thousand ninety-eight hayfever cases, diagnosed after age 2, were matched to controls for practice, age, sex and follow-up of control to case ascertainment date. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare exposure by age 1 (age 2 for MMR) inside vs. outside the grass pollen season (May, June, July). Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled across databases. RESULTS: There were no associations in either database between MMR during vs. outside the grass pollen season and later hayfever. Of 23 infections studied, none were statistically significant; although analyses for the less common conditions were limited by low statistical power. The pooled OR for hayfever comparing exposure to antibacterials only in the grass pollen season with only outside it was 1.20 (95% CI 0.98-1.47) and for DTP was 0.84 (95% CI 0.72-0.98). CONCLUSION: Although an interaction between early exposure to microbial agents and concurrent grass pollen exposure on hayfever risk seemed plausible, there was little evidence to support it across a range of analyses. However, the effect of DTP though weak deserves further study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02697.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The risk of later hay fever following exposure to MMR vaccine within the first grass pollen season of life was not statistically different from that observed when MMR administration occurred outside of it (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.18; P = 0.38).

    “The risk of later hay fever following exposure to MMR vaccine within the first grass pollen season of life was not statistically different from that observed when MMR administration occurred outside of it (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.18; P = 0.38).”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Bremner 2007

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Black 2003, Bremner 2005, Bremner 2007, DeStefano 2004, Ma 2005, Mrozek-Budzyn 2010, Ray 2006, and Smeeth 2004, the risk of bias was moderate/unknown.

    “Moderate/unknown risk of bias: eight studies (Black 2003; Bremner 2005; Bremner 2007; DeStefano 2004; Ma 2005; Mrozek-Budzyn 2010; Ray 2006; Smeeth 2004).”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Bremner 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sharp S, Sterne J. Sbe16: meta-analysis. Stata Techn Bull 1997; 38:9-14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bremner, S. A., Carey, I. M., DeWilde, S., Richards, N., Maier, W. C., Hilton, S. R., Strachan, D. P., & Cook, D. G.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Cook, D. G.
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
512-517
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W2094921335
Cited by
15
References
22
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical & Experimental Allergy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (065177)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Keywords
allergic rhinitis, early life exposure, vaccination, DTP vaccine, MMR vaccine, infection, antibacterial agents, allergy risk, microbial exposure
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, England, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Poaceae, Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infections, Male, Pollen, Primary Health Care, Seasons, Vaccination, Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine, Case-Control Studies, Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review