The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of the CRTH2 antagonist OC000459 in moderate persistent asthma
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Background CRTH2 is a G‐protein‐coupled receptor that mediates the activation of Th2 lymphocytes, eosinophils and basophils in response to prostaglandin D 2 and may be involved in the pathogenesis of airway inflammation and dysfunction in asthma. Objective To evaluate the effects of a potent and selective CRTH2 antagonist, OC000459, on the lung function, symptoms and eosinophilic airway inflammation in a double‐blind, parallel group trial in steroid‐free subjects with moderate persistent asthma. Methods Adult subjects were randomized to oral OC000459 200 mg twice daily (N=65) or a placebo (N=67) for 28 days. The primary end‐point was the change from baseline in pre‐bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1); eosinophilic airway inflammation was assessed by induced sputum differential eosinophil count. The trial was registered on the clinicaltrials.gov database (Identifier NCT01057927). Results Data were analysed for both the Full Analysis (FA) population and the Per Protocol (PP) population (55 treated with OC000459 and 52 with placebo), which excluded non‐compliant subjects. In the FA population, the mean change in FEV 1 was 7.1% on OC000459 compared with 4.3% on placebo (not significant); in the PP population, the mean changes were 9.2% and 1.8%, respectively (P=0.037). Improvement in quality of life was apparent in both FA and PP populations [difference from the placebo in AQLQ(S) total score of 0.29, P=0.0113 and 0.37, P=0.0022, respectively]. OC000459 also improved the night‐time symptom scores (mean reduction of 0.36 vs. 0.11, P=0.008, FA population; 0.37 vs. 0.12, P=0.022, PP population). The geometric mean sputum eosinophil count reduced from 2.1% to 0.7% (P=0.03) after OC000459, but this effect was not significant when compared with the change on placebo (P=0.37). Adverse events on OC000459 were comparable to those on placebo; respiratory infections were notably less common during OC000459 than the placebo treatment. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance This study provides the first clinical evidence that CRTH2 receptors contribute to airflow limitation, symptoms and eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthma. OC000459 shows promise as a novel oral treatment for asthma and related disorders. Cite this as: N. Barnes, I. Pavord, A. Chuchalin, J. Bell, M. Hunter, T. Lewis, D. Parker, M. Payton, L. Pearce Collins, R. Pettipher, J. Steiner and C. M. Perkins, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2012 (42) 38–48.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, M. R., Hankinson, J., Brusasco, V., Burgos, F., Casaburi, R., Coates, A., Crapo, R., Enright, P., van der Grinten, C. P. M., Gustafsson, P., et al. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00034805 · Cited by 15,627
A small molecule CRTH2 antagonist inhibits FITC-induced allergic cutaneous inflammation
Boehme, S. A., Franz-Bacon, K., Chen, E. P., Sasik, R., Sprague, L. J., Ly, T. W., Hardiman, G., & Bacon, K. B. (2009) · International Immunology · doi:10.1093/intimm/dxn127 · Cited by 60
Cited by
Lessons learned from the fate of AstraZeneca's drug pipeline: a five-dimensional framework
Cook, D., Brown, D., Alexander, R., March, R., Morgan, P., Satterthwaite, G., & Pangalos, M. N. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4309 · Cited by 1,344
TH2 cell development and function
Walker, J. A., & McKenzie, A. N. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2017.118 · Cited by 632
Therapies for allergic inflammation: refining strategies to induce tolerance
Akdis, C. A. (2012) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2754 · Cited by 296
Severe asthma: Advances in current management and future therapy
Barnes, P. J. (2012) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.006 · Cited by 174
The Complex Type 2 Endotype in Allergy and Asthma: From Laboratory to Bedside
Agache, I., Sugita, K., Morita, H., Akdis, M., & Akdis, C. A. (2015) · Current Allergy and Asthma Reports · doi:10.1007/s11882-015-0529-x · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnes, N., Pavord, I., Chuchalin, A., Bell, J., Hunter, M., Lewis, T., Parker, D., Payton, M., Collins, L. P., Pettipher, R., Steiner, J., & Perkins, C. M.
- Venue
- Clinical & Experimental Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-07-15
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-48
- ISSN
- 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2222
- OpenAlex
- W1512168554
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of the CRTH2 antagonist OC000459 in moderate persistent asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03813.x
- The paper
- Barnes, N., Pavord, I., Chuchalin, A., Bell, J., Hunter, M., Lewis, T., Parker, D., Payton, M., Collins, L. P., Pettipher, R., Steiner, J., & Perkins, C. M. (2012). A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of the CRTH2 antagonist OC000459 in moderate persistent asthma. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03813.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.