Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Psoriasis-an index of disability

FINLAY, A. Y., KELLY, S. E.·1987·Clinical and Experimental Dermatology

Abstract

Fifty‐Four patients completed a questionnaire to assess functional lifestyle disability caused by psoriasis and a detailed record of the area of psoriasis involvement was taken. The 10 most relevant and independent questions were identified from the original 28 questions and the final questionnaire score, the Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI), was used to quantify reduction in disability before (34. 1±11. 1) and after (22. 3± 10. 9, n=20, P<0. 002) in‐patient treatment. The total area of involvement of psoriasis is not a reliable guide to disability. The PDI may be used as a repeatable measure and record of disability caused by psoriasis and may potentially aid psoriasis management decision taking.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1987.tb01844.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
FINLAY, A. Y., & KELLY, S. E.
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
Published
1987-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
8-11
ISSN
  • 0307-6938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2230
OpenAlex
W2069070000
Cited by
334
References
0
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.