Cited by 116Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

A pilot study examining mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in psoriasis

Fordham, B., Griffiths, C.E.M., Bundy, C.·2015·Psychology, Health & Medicine

Abstract

A sub-population of people with psoriasis have strong causal beliefs about stress, high levels of emotional distress (anxiety and depression) and an impaired quality of life (QoL). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy has been found to reduce levels of stress and distress and to improve QoL. This pilot study in people with psoriasis aimed to test the hypothesis that mindfulness could reduce stress and thereby lessen psoriasis severity, improve QoL and reduce distress. Twenty-nine people with psoriasis (22-70-years old; 16 females; 13 males) were randomised to an eight-week mindfulness treatment as an adjunct to their usual psoriasis therapy or to a control group which continued with usual psoriasis therapy alone. All subjects completed self-reported measurements of psoriasis severity, perceived stress, distress and QoL, at baseline and again post-intervention. The mindfulness group reported statistically lower psoriasis severity (Self-Assessed Psoriasis Area Severity Index; z = 1.96, p = .05) and QoL impairment scores (Dermatology Life Quality Index; z = 2.30, p = .02) than the control group. There was no significant difference between groups on perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale; z = .07, p = .94) or distress scores (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale; z = 1.60, p = .11). People with psoriasis who received mindfulness as an adjunct to their usual therapy reported a significant improvement in both psoriasis severity and QoL. These pilot results suggest that a full randomised control trial is justified to examine the effectiveness of mindfulness as an adjunctive treatment for people with psoriasis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13548506.2014.902483

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fordham, B., Griffiths, C. E. M., & Bundy, C.
Affiliations
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Fordham, B.
Venue
Psychology, Health & Medicine
Published
2014-04
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
121-127
ISSN
  • 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3966
OpenAlex
W2105409351
Cited by
116
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology Health & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, psoriasis, psoriasis severity, quality of life, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, adjunctive therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psoriasis, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review