Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How common are polycystic ovaries in normal women and what is their significance for the fertility of the population?

Clayton, R. N., Ogden, V., Hodgkinson, J., Worswick, L., Rodin, D. A., Dyer, S., Meade, T. W.·1992·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE We wished to determine the prevalence of polycystic ovaries (PCO) and relate morphological appearance to fertility. DESIGN We sent postal invitations to a random sample of women born in the years 1952–1969 from a list of a single Group Practice to attend for reproductive history questionnaire, examination, ultrasound scan of the ovaries and hormone measurements within 5 days of the onset of menstruation. SUBJECTS Of 1065 women potentially available for study, 571 (54%) replied of whom 353 (62%) agreed to participate. One hundred and ninety (18%) completed the study, 163 were deferred (57 because of current or very recent pregnancy, 106 because of inconvenience at time approached), and 18 additional women volunteered. MEASUREMENTS Prevalence of polycystic ovaries, ovarian size and morphology, menstrual history, features of androgen excess, fertility status, serum hormone levels. RESULTS The prevalence of PCO was 22% (41/190). PCO and non‐PCO women were similar with respect to age, body mass index, oral contraceptive pill (OCP) usage, acne, and menstrual pattern but hirsutism (Ferrlman and Gallwey score > 7) was significantly (P= 0.006) more frequent among PCO women. Proven prior fertility was the same in PCO (56%) and non‐PCO (64%) women and an equal proportion in each group had not yet tested their fertility. Of those women with previously proven fertility, self‐perceived difficulty in conception occurred in similar proportions of women with and without PCO. Unresolved primary or secondary infertility (2.5–4%) was similar in both groups. Ovarian volume (each ovary separately) was larger in women with PCO irrespective of current OCP usage. Serum levels of oestradiol and FSH were similar in PCO and non‐PCO women, but LH was distributed around a higher median in PCO women. Median testosterone and androstenedione levels were the same in PCO and non‐PCO women. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of polycystic ovarian morphology is high but, in this sample of women, was accompanied by minimal clinical manifestations and apparently no deleterious effects on earlier fertility. An isolated finding of polycystic ovaries may be a normal variation and should not necessarily imply altered fertility potential.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1992.tb02296.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Clayton, R. N., Ogden, V., Hodgkinson, J., Worswick, L., Rodin, D. A., Dyer, S., & Meade, T. W.
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-08
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
127-134
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W2027463838
Cited by
357
References
0
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How common are polycystic ovaries in normal women and what is their significance for the fertility of the population? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1992.tb02296.x
The paper
Clayton, R. N., Ogden, V., Hodgkinson, J., Worswick, L., Rodin, D. A., Dyer, S., & Meade, T. W. (1992). How common are polycystic ovaries in normal women and what is their significance for the fertility of the population? Clinical Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1992.tb02296.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.