Cited by 2,132Ovarian function and disordersEndometriosis Research and TreatmentGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

The Androgen Excess and PCOS Society criteria for the polycystic ovary syndrome: the complete task force report

Open access
Azziz, Ricardo, Carmina, Enrico, Dewailly, Didier, Diamanti-Kandarakis, Evanthia, Escobar-Morreale, Héctor F., Futterweit, Walter, Janssen, Onno E., Legro, Richard S. +3 more·2009·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To review all available data and recommend a definition for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) based on published peer-reviewed data, whether already in use or not, to guide clinical diagnosis and future research.Design Literature review and expert consensus.Setting Professional society.Patients None.Intervention(s) None.Main outcome measure(s) A systematic review of the published peer-reviewed medical literature, by querying MEDLINE databases, to identify studies evaluating the epidemiology or phenotypic aspects of PCOS.Result(s) The Task Force drafted the initial report, following a consensus process via electronic communication, which was then reviewed and critiqued by the Androgen Excess and PCOS (AE-PCOS) Society AE-PCOS Board of Directors. No section was finalized until all members were satisfied with the contents, and minority opinions noted. Statements were not included that were not supported by peer-reviewed evidence.Conclusion(s) Based on the available data, it is the view of the AE-PCOS Society Task Force that PCOS should be defined by the presence of hyperandrogenism (clinical and/or biochemical), ovarian dysfunction (oligo-anovulation and/or polycystic ovaries), and the exclusion of related disorders. However, a minority considered the possibility that there may be forms of PCOS without overt evidence of hyperandrogenism, but recognized that more data are required before validating this supposition. Finally, the Task Force recognized and fully expects that the definition of this syndrome will evolve over time to incorporate new research findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.035

Cites

311 of 311 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2005;30:130-4.
  2. Wong IL, Morris RS, Lobo RA, Paulson RJ, Sauer MV. Isolated poly- cystic morphology in ovum donors predicts response to ovarian stimu- lation. Hum Reprod 1995;10:524-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azziz, R., Carmina, E., Dewailly, D., Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., Escobar-Morreale, H. F., Futterweit, W., Janssen, O. E., Legro, R. S., Norman, R. J., Taylor, A. E., & Witchel, S. F.
Affiliations
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • University of Palermo (IT)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
  • Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Carmina, Enrico
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
456-488
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035217519
Cited by
2,132
References
311
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 149 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 170 · 2022: 171 · 2021: 140 · 2020: 148 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 109 · 2015: 141 · 2014: 142 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 93
FWCI
73.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, PCOS diagnostic criteria, hyperandrogenism, ovarian dysfunction, oligoanovulation, polycystic ovary, PCOS phenotypes
MeSH terms
Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Menstruation Disturbances, Terminology as Topic, Ovarian Function Tests, Ovary, Ovulation, Phenotype, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Predictive Value of Tests, Biomarkers, Hyperandrogenism, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review