The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biodiversity in tropical agroforests and the ecological role of ants and ant diversity in predatory function
Abstract
Abstract 1. Intensive agricultural practices drive biodiversity loss with potentially drastic consequences for ecosystem services. To advance conservation and production goals, agricultural practices should be compatible with biodiversity. Traditional or less intensive systems (i.e. with fewer agrochemicals, less mechanisation, more crop species) such as shaded coffee and cacao agroforests are highlighted for their ability to provide a refuge for biodiversity and may also enhance certain ecosystem functions (i.e. predation). 2. Ants are an important predator group in tropical agroforestry systems. Generally, ant biodiversity declines with coffee and cacao intensification yet the literature lacks a summary of the known mechanisms for ant declines and how this diversity loss may affect the role of ants as predators. 3. Here, how shaded coffee and cacao agroforestry systems protect biodiversity and may preserve related ecosystem functions is discussed in the context of ants as predators. Specifically, the relationships between biodiversity and predation, links between agriculture and conservation, patterns and mechanisms for ant diversity loss with agricultural intensification, importance of ants as control agents of pests and fungal diseases, and whether ant diversity may influence the functional role of ants as predators are addressed. Furthermore, because of the importance of homopteran‐tending by ants in the ecological and agricultural literature, as well as to the success of ants as predators, the costs and benefits of promoting ants in agroforests are discussed. 4. Especially where the diversity of ants and other predators is high, as in traditional agroforestry systems, both agroecosystem function and conservation goals will be advanced by biodiversity protection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: The insurance hypothesis
Yachi, S., & Loreau, M. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463 · Cited by 3,211
Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the consumer connection
Duffy, J. E. (2002) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990201.x · Cited by 653 · cited 6×
“Intraspecific differences in foraging or behaviour may augment overall responses to herbivore communities (Schmitz & Suttle, 2001; Duffy, 2002) or may increase functionality under the insurance hypothesis (Yachi & Loreau, 1999).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
PHILPOTT, S. M., ARENDT, W. J., ARMBRECHT, I., BICHIER, P., DIESTCH, T. V., GORDON, C., GREENBERG, R., PERFECTO, I., REYNOSO‐SANTOS, R., SOTO‐PINTO, L., et al. (2008) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01029.x · Cited by 438
Self-citationGonzalez, A., Mouquet, N., & Loreau, M. (2009) · Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0010 · Cited by 92
Larsen, A. E., & Noack, F. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1620674114 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- PHILPOTT, S. M., & ARMBRECHT, I.
- Venue
- Ecological Entomology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-07-18
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 369-377
- ISSN
- 0307-6946 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2311
- OpenAlex
- W2162950205
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodiversity in tropical agroforests and the ecological role of ants and ant diversity in predatory function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00793.x
- The paper
- PHILPOTT, S. M., & ARMBRECHT, I. (2006). Biodiversity in tropical agroforests and the ecological role of ants and ant diversity in predatory function. Ecological Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00793.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.