Depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and health-related quality of life and its association with social support in ambulatory prostate cancer patients: Depression and anxiety in prostate cancer
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study is to identify anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in prostate cancer patients and to investigate the association with social support and health-related quality of life. A total of 511 men who had undergone prostatectomy were surveyed during ambulatory follow-up care for an average of 27 months after surgery using standardised self-report measures (e.g. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist--Civilian Version, Illness-Specific Social Support Scale, Short-Form Health Survey). Seventy-six per cent of patients evaluated their disease as 'not' or a 'little threatening'. The cancer diagnosis and uncertainty were most frequently reported as 'distressing', while medical treatment and doctor-patient interaction were most frequently evaluated as 'most helpful'. The number of patients reporting increased levels of psychological distress was 16%, with 6% demonstrating signs of having severe mental health problems'. No higher levels of anxiety and depression were observed in cancer patients compared with age-adjusted normative comparison groups. Lack of positive support, detrimental interactions and perceived threat of cancer were found to be predictors of psychological co-morbidity (P < 0.001). Lack of positive support, detrimental interactions, threat of cancer, disease stage and age significantly predicted mental health (P < 0.001), whereas the impact of social support on physical health was rather weak. Findings emphasise the need for routine psychosocial screening.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Elevated distress is reported in 16-31% of PC patients.
“Elevated distress is reported in 16-31% of PC patients, and approximately 6% of patients meet criteria for a psychiatric disorder (e.g., mood disorders) [2,3].”
From Brief report of a tablet-delivered psychosocial intervention for men with advanced prostate cancer: Acceptability and efficacy by race (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
The Psychological co-morbidity and HRQOL section reports increased psychological distress or a probable psychiatric disorder in 16.2% of the study's ambulatory prostate cancer patients. The Introduction reports a wider 13–53% range across studies, but the paper does not report the claimed 16–31% range; only its lower end is supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBlack men are 2.4 times more likely to die from PC compared with NHW men.
“Black men are also more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic disease (stage IV) [5] for which the 5-year survival rate drops to 30% [1], and black men are 2.4 times more likely to die from PC compared with NHW men [3].”
From Brief report of a tablet-delivered psychosocial intervention for men with advanced prostate cancer: Acceptability and efficacy by race (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
The Introduction discusses prostate cancer incidence and psychosocial distress, while the results address psychological outcomes in ambulatory patients; neither reports mortality by race. Searches for the 2.4-fold mortality figure and Black-versus-non-Hispanic-White comparisons found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 202
- Authors
- MEHNERT, A., LEHMANN, C., GRAEFEN, M., HULAND, H., & KOCH, U.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Corresponding author
- MEHNERT, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer Care
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2009-10-14
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 736-745
- ISSN
- 0961-5423 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1500230632
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Cancer Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Keywords
- prostate cancer, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, health-related quality of life, social support, psychological distress, doctor-patient interaction, psychosocial screening, prostatectomy
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Anxiety, Awareness, Depressive Disorder, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatic Neoplasms, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review