Brief report of a tablet-delivered psychosocial intervention for men with advanced prostate cancer: Acceptability and efficacy by race
Open accessAbstract
Relative to non-Hispanic whites (NHW), black men are disproportionately affected by prostate cancer (PC) incidence, have poorer PC outcomes, and report greater compromises in health-related quality of life. Despite these challenges, black men are underrepresented in psychosocial cancer research, possibly due to limited access to supportive oncology programs. The purpose of this article is to examine the acceptability and efficacy for reducing disease-specific distress of a tablet-delivered psychosocial intervention for older men with advanced PC (APC) and explore differences by race. Men with APC (N = 192, 37.5% black, age M = 68.84 years) were randomized to 10-week Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) or attention-control Health Promotion (HP), both delivered via tablets. Assessments occurred at baseline in person, weekly during the 10-week program via tablets, and at 6 and 12 months in person. Weekly session evaluations and postprogram exit surveys assessed acceptability. Efficacy was assessed with a measure of PC-anxiety validated with racially diverse PC patients using linear mixed effects modeling. Study retention and group attendance did not differ by race. CBSM and HP were both acceptable among older APC patients. Black men rated both conditions more favorably than NHW men. Men in CBSM (vs. HP) reported greater reductions in PC-anxiety at 6 months (not sustained at 12 months). Black men in CBSM reported greater decreases in PC-anxiety over time compared with all other groups. Tablet-delivered CBSM and HP were acceptable for black and NHW APC patients, although black men rated both conditions more favorably. Black men reported a unique intervention benefit related to reduced disease-specific distress. © 2018 Society of Behavioral Medicine 2018. All rights reserved.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
16 of 32 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Black men in CBSM reported lower MAX-PC scores at T2 and T3 compared with other samples of APC.
“Black men in CBSM reported lower MAX-PC scores at T2 and T3 compared with other samples of APC [20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Johanes, 2013, Anxiety level of early- and late-stage prostate cancer patients, Prostate Int source
The Results section compares MAX-PC scores in early- and advanced-stage prostate cancer patients, not Black men receiving CBSM. A search of our full-text copy found no CBSM group, T2 or T3 measurements, or comparison with other APC samples. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
The proportion of black men in this study (37.5%) is higher than most other psychosocial research in PC (8-20%).
“In our sample of older men with APC, more than one third of the participants were black men (37.5%).This proportion of black men is higher than most other psychosocial research in PC, which ranges from 8% to 20% of reported samples [24][25][26][27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [24] Parker, 2009, The effects of a presurgical stress management intervention for men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy, J Clin Oncol source
- cites [25] Lepore, 2003, Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions, Health Psychol source
- cites [26] Northouse, 2007, Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses, Cancer source
- Findingown data
At baseline, there was no difference in MAX-PC scores between NHW and black men.
“At baseline, there was no difference in MAX-PC scores between NHW and black men, and scores were similar to those reported in other samples of APC [19].”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“In our sample, before intervention, we did not find evidence of disparities related to PC-anxiety in this sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Nelson, 2016, Assessing anxiety in Black men with prostate cancer: further data on the reliability and validity of the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC), Support Care Cancer source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says prior studies found anxiety in Black men was no higher than in White men, and compares this Black sample with earlier, primarily White validation samples. But it also says this study had no non-Black control group, so it cannot establish that NHW and Black men had no difference in baseline MAX-PC scores. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Premisecitation
The MAX-PC has been validated with black and APC patients.
“The 18-item Memorial Anxiety Scale for PC (MAX-PC) assesses PC-related anxiety [18] and has been validated with black and APC patients [19,20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Nelson, 2016, Assessing anxiety in Black men with prostate cancer: further data on the reliability and validity of the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC), Support Care Cancer source
- cites [20] Johanes, 2013, Anxiety level of early- and late-stage prostate cancer patients, Prostate Int source
The Discussion (page unavailable) calls MAX-PC a valid and reliable method for identifying prostate-cancer-related anxiety. The Data collection section (page unavailable) says earlier studies validated the questionnaire, but this paper does not say it was validated with Black or APC patients; its own study used a modified 11-question version in early- and advanced-stage patients. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
There was no interaction of time and condition on MAX-PC scores within white participants.
“There was no interaction of time and condition on MAX-PC scores within white participants (p > .05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingcitation
The proportion of black participants in this study is higher than in our own prior studies of men with PC (18-22%).
“The proportion of black participants in this study is also higher than in our own prior studies of men with PC, which have ranged from 18% to 22% [28,29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [28] Penedo, 2006, A randomized clinical trial of group-based cognitive-behavioral stress management in localized prostate cancer: development of stress management skills improves quality of life and benefit finding, Ann Behav Med source
- cites [29] Penedo, 2007, Cognitive behavioral stress management intervention improves quality of life in Spanish monolingual Hispanic men treated for localized prostate cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial, Int J Behav Med source
- Findingown data
There was a significant interaction of time and condition on MAX-PC scores within black participants.
“There was a significant interaction of time and condition on MAX-PC scores within black participants (F[2, 160] = 3.93, p = .022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CBSM, weekly group ratings did not differ by race.
“In CBSM, weekly group ratings did not differ by race (NHW vs. black; Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was not a significant main effect of condition among white participants.
“There was not a significant main effect of condition among white participants (p > .05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Black men in CBSM reported greater decreases in PC-anxiety over time compared with all other groups.
“Black men in CBSM reported greater decreases in PC-anxiety over time compared with all other groups.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
“When racial groups were assessed separately, it became clear that black men in particular benefitted from the CBSM intervention.”
- Also stated in: § Efficacy: PC-anxiety · plain
“From T1 to T2, there was a more negative slope in black CBSM participants versus black HP participants (b = -4.31,SE = 1.90, p = .025),which was sustained at T3 (b = -4.92,SE = 1.99, p = .014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
- Findingown data
There was a marginally significant main effect of time among white participants, with white men reporting marginally lower MAX-PC scores at T3 versus T1 regardless of study condition.
“There was a marginally significant main effect of time (F[2, 165] = 2.68, p = .072),with white men reporting marginally lower MAX-PC scores at T3 (vs.T1) regardless of study condition (b = -1.72,SE = 0.86, p = .047).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant interaction of time and condition on MAX-PC scores in the total sample.
“There was a significant interaction of time and condition on MAX-PC scores (F[2, 299] = 3.41, p = .034).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CBSM, black men reported significantly greater acceptability of all CBSM components (medium-large effects).
“In CBSM, black men reported significantly greater acceptability of all CBSM components (medium-large effects; Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Participants with APC were engaged with both conditions.
“This report of patient engagement, acceptability, and efficacy of tablet-delivered CBSM and HP showed that participants with APC were engaged with both conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Study retention did not differ by race in either condition.
“Retention was acceptable and similar for CBSM and HP (>70%) and did not differ by race in either condition (ps > .05).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Study retention and group attendance did not differ by race.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
In HP, black men rated the weekly information as more useful than NHW men (medium effect).
“In HP, black men (vs.NHW men) rated the weekly information as more useful (medium effect).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Black men rated both conditions more favorably than NHW men.
“Black men rated both conditions more favorably than NHW men.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Contrary to our hypothesis and preliminary findings [12], acceptability of both conditions was higher among black men.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Findingown data
In HP, black men reported significantly or marginally greater acceptability of all HP components (small-medium effects).
“In HP, black men reported significantly or marginally greater acceptability all HP components (small-medium effects).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Black men in CBSM had marginally lower MAX-PC scores than black men in HP at T2 and at T3.
“Black men in CBSM had marginally lower MAX-PC scores than black men in HP at T2 (p = .098)and at T3 (p = .051).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no differences between men randomized to CBSM and HP on demographic or medical variables.
“There were no differences between men randomized to CBSM and HP on demographic or medical variables, but baseline MAX-PC scores were higher in CBSM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Group attendance did not differ by race in either condition.
“Group attendance was acceptable and similar for CBSM (M = 7.47, SD = 3.09) and HP (M = 7.90, SD = 2.86; p > .05)and did not differ by race in either condition (ps > .05;Table 3).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Study retention and group attendance did not differ by race.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Interpretationown data
Black men reported a unique intervention benefit related to reduced disease-specific distress.
“Black men reported a unique intervention benefit related to reduced disease-specific distress.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Thus, within the CBSM condition, black men not only liked the intervention more but also reported greater benefits related to decreases in disease-specific distress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Interpretationcitation
Once the obstacle of recruiting and retaining hard-to-reach older black men was overcome, black men liked having accessible and interactive health information related to the CBSM intervention and HP components.
“Indeed, it appears that once the obstacle of recruiting and retaining hard-to-reach older black men was successfully overcome [9], black men liked having accessible and interactive health information related to the CBSM intervention and HP components.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Ford, 2008, Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review, Cancer source
- Interpretationreasoning
The study design likely promoted greater attendance and overall retention of older black men with advanced disease.
“Our study design likely promoted greater attendance and overall retention of older black men with advanced disease (e.g., flexible scheduling and transportation provided).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Two studies found lower HRQoL in black PC patients relative to NHW patients.
“Two studies found lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in black PC patients relative to NHW patients [6,7], whereas another study found evidence of protective resiliency among black PC patients [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [6] Lubeck, 2001, Health related quality of life differences between black and white men with prostate cancer: data from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor, J Urol source
- cites [7] Kinlock, 2017, High levels of medical mistrust are associated with low quality of life among black and white men with prostate cancer, Cancer Control source
- Study design and conductown data
Internal consistency coefficients for the MAX-PC were acceptable (α ranged from .68 to .77).
“Internal consistency coefficients were acceptable (α ranged from .68 to .77).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Study design is a key factor in reducing barriers to recruitment and retention of hard-to-reach black men in psychosocial cancer research.
“Thus, study design is a key factor in reducing barriers to recruitment and retention of hard-to-reach black men in psychosocial cancer research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
- May combine two claims. 20
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationAcross time, men in both conditions reported MAX-PC scores that remained within 1 SD of scores reported in other samples of APC.
“Across time, men in both conditions reported MAX-PC scores that remained within 1 SD of scores reported in other samples of APC [20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Johanes, 2013, Anxiety level of early- and late-stage prostate cancer patients, Prostate Int source
The Results report mean MAX-PC scores of 8.32 and 12.61 for early- and advanced-stage patients. The Discussion compares this study’s overall mean with another sample’s mean of 9.3 ± 6.8; both group means fall within one standard deviation of that figure. But this was a cross-sectional comparison of disease stages, not a study of two conditions followed across time, so the longitudinal claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationElevated distress is reported in 16-31% of PC patients.
“Elevated distress is reported in 16-31% of PC patients, and approximately 6% of patients meet criteria for a psychiatric disorder (e.g., mood disorders) [2,3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] Roth, 1998, Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study, Cancer source
- cites [3] Mehnert, 2010, Depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and health-related quality of life and its association with social support in ambulatory prostate cancer patients, Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) source
The Psychological co-morbidity and HRQOL section reports increased psychological distress or a probable psychiatric disorder in 16.2% of the study's ambulatory prostate cancer patients. The Introduction reports a wider 13–53% range across studies, but the paper does not report the claimed 16–31% range; only its lower end is supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBlack men are more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic disease (stage IV).
“Black men are also more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic disease (stage IV) [5] for which the 5-year survival rate drops to 30% [1], and black men are 2.4 times more likely to die from PC compared with NHW men [3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Anai, 2006, Prostate cancer screening and detection in inner-city and underserved men, J Natl Med Assoc source
The Results (abstract; page unavailable) report that African American men in this inner-city cohort more often had advanced disease or distant metastasis than the comparison groups (16.1% versus 3.8% and 0%). The paper combines T3/T4, N1, and M1 cases, so it does not establish a higher rate specifically of metastatic (stage IV) diagnoses. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAnother study found evidence of protective resiliency among black PC patients.
“Two studies found lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in black PC patients relative to NHW patients [6,7], whereas another study found evidence of protective resiliency among black PC patients [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Nelson, 2010, Distress, anxiety, depression, and emotional well-being in African-American men with prostate cancer, Psychooncology source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBlack men are 2.4 times more likely to die from PC compared with NHW men.
“Black men are also more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic disease (stage IV) [5] for which the 5-year survival rate drops to 30% [1], and black men are 2.4 times more likely to die from PC compared with NHW men [3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Mehnert, 2010, Depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and health-related quality of life and its association with social support in ambulatory prostate cancer patients, Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) source
The Introduction discusses prostate cancer incidence and psychosocial distress, while the results address psychological outcomes in ambulatory patients; neither reports mortality by race. Searches for the 2.4-fold mortality figure and Black-versus-non-Hispanic-White comparisons found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationWe used a measure validated specifically with black and APC patients to assess preliminary efficacy, increasing the validity of our findings.
“We also used a measure validated specifically with black and APC patients to assess preliminary efficacy, increasing the validity of our findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Nelson, 2016, Assessing anxiety in Black men with prostate cancer: further data on the reliability and validity of the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC), Support Care Cancer source
The Discussion reports that the MAX-PC was reliable and valid in a sample of Black men with prostate cancer. The Methods (Participants) say the sample included both early- and late-stage disease, but the paper does not establish validation specifically for advanced prostate cancer patients as a separate group. The statement that using the measure increased the citing study’s validity is the citing authors’ own conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [20] Johanes, 2013, Anxiety level of early- and late-stage prostate cancer patients, Prostate Int source
The Data collection section (page unavailable) says the study used the MAX-PC anxiety questionnaire and reports that it had been validated in studies in New York and Rotterdam. It does not say the measure was validated specifically with Black and APC patients or used to assess preliminary efficacy; this study assessed anxiety in early- and advanced-stage prostate cancer patients. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOur team has adapted CBSM for older men with APC, and we have shown preliminary feasibility and acceptability in a small sample.
“Our team has adapted a psychosocial intervention (Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management [CBSM]) [11] for older men with advanced PC (APC; stages III-IV), and we have shown preliminary feasibility and acceptability in a small sample [12].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe following rates were deemed acceptable based on prior studies of advanced or metastatic cancer patients: 70% retention and 70% average session attendance.
“We tracked study retention and attendance, and the following rates were deemed acceptable based on prior studies of advanced or metastatic cancer patients: 70% retention and 70% average session attendance [16,17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Campbell, 2007, Facilitating research participation and improving quality of life for African American prostate cancer survivors and their intimate partners. A pilot study of telephone-based coping skills training, Cancer source
The Recruitment and retention section (page not available) reports that 15 of 20 treatment couples completed treatment and describes session adherence, but gives no 70% acceptability threshold. Searches for 70% retention, 70% average session attendance, and prior studies of advanced or metastatic cancer patients found no passage establishing those criteria. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [17] Kissane, 2007, Supportive-expressive group therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: survival and psychosocial outcome from a randomized controlled trial, Psychooncology source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMen in CBSM versus HP reported greater reductions in PC-anxiety at 6 months, but this benefit was not sustained at 12 months.
“Men in CBSM (vs.HP) reported greater reductions in PC-anxiety at 6 months (not sustained at 12 months).”
- Also stated in: § Efficacy: PC-anxiety · plain
“From T1 to T2, there was a more negative slope in CBSM vs. HP (b = -2.69,SE = 1.05, p = .011),but this was not sustained at T3 (p > .05).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Exploratory analyses of efficacy for reducing disease-specific distress in the total sample revealed an overall intervention effect on decreased PC-anxiety at 6 months, but this benefit was not sustained at 12 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Efficacy: PC-anxiety · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMen in CBSM versus HP had lower MAX-PC scores at T2, but not at T3.
“Men in CBSM versus HP had lower MAX-PC scores at T2 (p = .025),but not T3 (p > .05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll other groups (black men in HP, NHW men in CBSM, NHW men in HP) did not report significant changes in MAX-PC scores over time.
“By comparison, all other groups did not report significant changes in MAX-PC scores over time (i.e., black men in HP, NHW men in CBSM, NHW men in HP).”
- Also stated in: § Efficacy: PC-anxiety · plain
“For black participants in the HP condition, MAX-PC scores did not change from T1 to T2 or T1 to T3 (ps > .05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Efficacy: PC-anxiety · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAverage exit survey responses were favorable and similar for CBSM and HP.
“Average exit survey responses were favorable and similar for CBSM (M = 3.53, SD = 0.55) and HP (M = 3.65, SD = 0.41; p > .05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWithin CBSM, MAX-PC scores were significantly lower at T2 versus T1, and this was maintained at T3.
“Pairwise comparisons showed that, within CBSM, MAX-PC scores were significantly lower at T2 versus T1 (p < .001),and this was maintained at T3 (p = .011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCBSM and HP were both acceptable among older APC patients.
“CBSM and HP were both acceptable among older APC patients.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Tablet-delivered CBSM and attention-matched HP were both acceptable to this sample, and participants were engaged with both conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBlack men in CBSM reported a significant reduction in PC-anxiety at 6 months, which was maintained at 12 months.
“Black men in CBSM reported a significant reduction in PC-anxiety at 6 months, which was maintained at 12 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataBlack men reported lower SES (e.g., lower education and income) compared to NHW men in this sample.
“There were demographic differences between NHW and black men across study conditions; black men reported lower SES (e.g., lower education and income) compared to NHW men in this sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWithin HP, MAX-PC scores did not change from T1 to T2 or T1 to T3.
“Within HP, MAX-PC scores did not change from T1 to T2 or T1 to T3 (ps > .05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataBlack men were more likely to be recruited from the VA medical center than NHW men.
“Black men were also more likely to be recruited from the VA medical center than NHW men.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were 24 adverse events during the study (6 hospitalizations, 17 deaths, and 1 new cancer diagnosis).
“There were 24 adverse events during the study (6 hospitalizations, 17 deaths including men lost to follow up and after the T3 assessment, and 1 new cancer diagnosis).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataBaseline MAX-PC scores were higher in CBSM than in HP.
“There were no differences between men randomized to CBSM and HP on demographic or medical variables, but baseline MAX-PC scores were higher in CBSM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll adverse events were unrelated to the present study's treatment.
“All adverse events were unrelated to the present study's treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOlder age and lower socioeconomic status are barriers to recruitment and retention in psychosocial cancer research.
“Older age and lower socioeconomic status (SES) are barriers as well, as they frequently relate to study design barriers (e.g., age restrictions, functional status) [9].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Ford, 2008, Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review, Cancer source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll participants gave informed consent, approved by the IRB at each institution.
“All participants gave informed consent (approved by the IRB at each institution).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataWe used linear mixed effects modeling to assess three models of change in MAX-PC scores over time controlling for age, comorbidities, and baseline MAX-PC scores.
“We used linear mixed effects modeling to assess three models of change in MAX-PC scores over time controlling for age, comorbidities [22], and baseline MAX-PC scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Chipperfield, 2013, Predictors of depression, anxiety and quality of life in patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy, Psychooncology source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationWe analyzed MAX-PC for normality and Winsorized outliers of >3 SD from the mean.
“We analyzed MAX-PC for normality and Winsorized outliers of >3 SD from the mean [21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Wilcox, 1993, Some results on a Winsorized correlation coefficient, Br J Math Stat Psychol source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAll participants were provided tablets, which limits generalization to individuals without access to mobile technology.
“All participants were provided tablets, which limits generalization to individuals without access to mobile technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAll data available were used to estimate models, so that participants were included at each time point for which they provided data (as opposed to listwise deletion).
“All data available were used to estimate models, so that participants were included at each time point for which they provided data (as opposed to listwise deletion).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCBSM integrates cognitive-behavioral stress and self-management skills with relaxation skills training to improve HRQoL and reduce symptoms.
“CBSM integrates cognitive-behavioral stress and self-management skills (e.g., cognitive restructuring) with relaxation skills training (e.g., deep breathing) to improve HRQoL and reduce symptoms [11].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Penedo, 2008 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataParticipants were randomized (1:1) to CBSM or HP, and groups were stratified by disease status (advanced vs. metastatic disease).
“Participants were randomized (1:1) to CBSM or HP (four to six men per condition), and groups were stratified by disease status (advanced vs. metastatic disease).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationWe adjusted pairwise comparisons with Sidak correction for multiple comparisons.
“We adjusted pairwise comparisons with Sidak correction for multiple comparisons [23].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Sidak, 1967, Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions, J Am Stat Assoc
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBlack men face unique barriers limiting their involvement in clinical trials, such as limited awareness of trials and lower acceptance into trials.
“Black men face unique barriers limiting their involvement in clinical trials such as limited awareness of trials and lower acceptance into trials [9,10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPC disproportionately affects black men, with 70% higher incidence than NHW men.
“PC disproportionately affects black men, with 70% higher incidence than non-Hispanic white (NHW) men [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] American Cancer Society
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenSessions were recorded and reviewed in weekly supervision with licensed clinical psychologists trained in both protocols to ensure intervention fidelity.
“Sessions were recorded and reviewed in weekly supervision with licensed clinical psychologists trained in both protocols to ensure intervention fidelity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataWe projected that with 150 participants retained at T3 and a .05 alpha level, we would have a power of 0.86 for detecting intervention effects on HRQoL.
“We projected that with 150 participants retained at T3 and a .05alpha level, we would have a power of 0.86 for detecting intervention effects on HRQoL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWe did not collect information about race prior to study enrollment because race was not part of our eligibility criteria; consequently, differences in recruitment by race could not be assessed.
“We did not collect information about race prior to study enrollment because race was not part of our eligibility criteria; consequently, differences in recruitment by race could not be assessed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Administering the intervention via tablets reduces barriers to recruiting and retaining minority men (black men).
“In the study design, we made efforts to reduce barriers to recruiting and retaining minority men (i.e., black men), including administration of the intervention via tablets.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
HP attendance test has too many degrees of freedom for the stated racial groups
MinorThe HP attendance row reports a comparison between 55 NHW and 35 black participants, but its t-test has 91 degrees of freedom. An ordinary two-group t-test using all 90 participants would have 88 degrees of freedom, and missing attendance data would reduce that number further.
“7.83 (3.07) 7.80 (2.60) t(91) = 0.04”
“(n = 55) | (n = 35) | Statistic | d”
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742 · see citing works
Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal Distributions
Šidák, Z. (1967) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935 · Cited by 2,904 · see citing works
Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal Distributions
Šidák, Z. (1967) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2283989 · Cited by 1,455 · see citing works
Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review
Ford, J. G., Howerton, M. W., Lai, G. Y., Gary, T. L., Bolen, S., Gibbons, M. C., Tilburt, J., Baffi, C., Tanpitukpongse, T. P., Wilson, R. F., et al. (2008) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23157 · Cited by 1,083 · see citing works
Kissane, D. W., Grabsch, B., Clarke, D. M., Smith, G. C., Love, A. W., Bloch, S., Snyder, R. D., & Li, Y. (2007) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1185 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses
Northouse, L. L., Mood, D. W., Schafenacker, A., Montie, J. E., Sandler, H. M., Forman, J. D., Hussain, M., Pienta, K. J., Smith, D. C., & Kershaw, T. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23114 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Lepore, S. J., Helgeson, V. S., Eton, D. T., & Schulz, R. (2003) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.5.443 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Roth, A. J., Rosenfeld, B., Kornblith, A. B., Gibson, C., Scher, H. I., Curley‐Smart, T., Holland, J. C., & Breitbart, W. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11386 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Rivers, D., August, E. M., Sehovic, I., Lee Green, B., & Quinn, G. P. (2013) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2013.03.007 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Penedo, F. J., Molton, I., Dahn, J. R., Shen, B.-J., Kinsinger, D., Traeger, L., Siegel, S., Schneiderman, N., & Antoni, M. (2006) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm3103_8 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationMEHNERT, A., LEHMANN, C., GRAEFEN, M., HULAND, H., & KOCH, U. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01117.x · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Campbell, L. C., Keefe, F. J., Scipio, C., McKee, D. C., Edwards, C. L., Herman, S. H., Johnson, L. E., Colvin, O. M., McBride, C. M., & Donatucci, C. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22355 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Taylor, C. L. C., deMoor, C., Smith, M. A., Dunn, A. L., Basen-Engquist, K., Nielsen, I., Pettaway, C., Sellin, R., Massey, P., & Gritz, E. R. (2006) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1023 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Penedo, F. J., Traeger, L., Dahn, J., Molton, I., Gonzalez, J. S., Schneiderman, N., & Antoni, M. H. (2007) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf03000188 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationLUBECK, D. P., KIM, H., GROSSFELD, G., RAY, P., PENSON, D. F., FLANDERS, S. C., & CARROLL, P. R. (2001) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65551-6 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Parker, P. A., Pettaway, C. A., Babaian, R. J., Pisters, L. L., Miles, B., Fortier, A., Wei, Q., Carr, D. D., & Cohen, L. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.16.0036 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Yanez, B., McGinty, H. L., Mohr, D. C., Begale, M. J., Dahn, J. R., Flury, S. C., Perry, K. T., & Penedo, F. J. (2015) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.29658 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationKinlock, B. L., Parker, L. J., Bowie, J. V., Howard, D. L., Laveist, T. A., & Thorpe, R. J. (2017) · Cancer Control · doi:10.1177/107327481702400112 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Chipperfield, K., Fletcher, J., Millar, J., Brooker, J., Smith, R., Frydenberg, M., & Burney, S. (2013) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3269 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Distress, anxiety, depression, and emotional well-being in African-American men with prostate cancer
Nelson, C. J., Balk, E. M., & Roth, A. J. (2010) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1659 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Some results on a Winsorized correlation coefficient
Wilcox, R. R. (1993) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1993.tb01020.x · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We analyzed MAX-PC for normality and Winsorized outliers of >3 SD from the mean [21].”
MethodAnxiety level of early- and late-stage prostate cancer patients
Johanes, C., Monoarfa, R. A., Ismail, R. I., & Umbas, R. (2013) · Prostate International · doi:10.12954/pi.13027 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Cognitive-Behavioral Stress Management for Prostate Cancer Recovery: Facilitator Guide
Penedo, F. J., Antoni, M. H., & Schneiderman, N. (2008) · doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780195336979.001.0001 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationProstate cancer screening and detection in inner-city and underserved men.
(2006) · PubMed Central · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Weiss, T., Weinberger, M. I., Holland, J., Nelson, C., & Moadel, A. (2012) · Journal of Geriatric Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2011.12.001 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Nelson, C. J., Starr, T. D., Macchia, R. J., Hyacinthe, L., Friedman, S., & Roth, A. J. (2016) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3092-7 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Cognitive-Behavioral Stress Management for Prostate Cancer Recovery Workbook
Penedo, F., Antoni, M., & Schneiderman, N. (2008) · doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780195336986.001.0001 · Cited by 9
Self-citation961: Prostate Cancer Screening and Detection in Inner-City Men
Anai, S., Wludyka, P., Pendleton, J. M., Williams, C., Nelms, L., Pettaway, C. A., & Rosser, C. J. (2006) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(18)33186-0 · Cited by 1
Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma
Roth, A. J., Kornblith, A. B., Batel-Copel, L., Peabody, E., Scher, H. I., & Holland, J. C. (1998) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The increasing value of eHealth in the delivery of patient-centred cancer care
Penedo, F. J., Oswald, L. B., Kronenfeld, J. P., Garcia, S. F., Cella, D., & Yanez, B. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30021-8 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Self-citationTelemedicine Acceptance Among Older Adult Patients With Cancer: Scoping Review
Pang, N.-Q., Lau, J., Fong, S.-Y., Wong, C. Y.-H., & Tan, K.-K. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/28724 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Of these, 6 studies [18,20,22,27,32,33] reported a generally favorable attitude toward acceptance of telemedicine; none of these studies went as far as to conclude that telemedicine can be used to completely replace traditional in-person consult for follow-up care.”
BackgroundInfluentialKronenfeld, J. P., Graves, K. D., Penedo, F. J., & Yanez, B. R. (2021) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1002/onco.13729 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“Additional research is needed, and is currently underway by the authors of this article, to increase the understanding of stress-related outcomes in HLs with malignancies, with particular emphasis on the design and implementation of interventions to ameliorate these disparities [38, 39].”
BackgroundSelf-citationSchoenthaler, A., Leon, M., Butler, M. J., Steinhaeuser, K., & Wardzinski, W. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/17135 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“Owing to their portability and ease of use, tablets are increasingly being used as an acceptable digital platform to deliver interventions across all age and racial and ethnic groups [20,21].”
BackgroundYanez, B. R., Oswald, L. B., Baik, S. H., Buitrago, D., Iacobelli, F., Perez-Tamayo, A. M., Guitelman, J., Penedo, F. J., & Buscemi, J. (2019) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5281 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“This exit survey has been used in a previous intervention trial.(30,34)”
MethodSelf-citationPenedo, F. J., Fox, R. S., Oswald, L. B., Moreno, P. I., Boland, C. L., Estabrook, R., McGinty, H. L., Mohr, D. C., Begale, M. J., Dahn, J. R., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-019-09839-7 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationPenedo, F., Fox, R., Walsh, E. A., Yanez, B., Miller, G., Oswald, L., Estabrook, R., Chatterton, R., Mohr, D., Begale, M., et al. (2021) · Brain, behavior, and immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2021.03.014 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationOswald, L. B., Li, X., Carvajal, R., Hoogland, A. I., Gudenkauf, L. M., Hansen, D. K., Alsina, M., Locke, F. L., Rodriguez, Y., Irizarry-Arroyo, N. E., et al. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14112742 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“At day 30, acceptability was assessed with a study-specific survey developed by the study team based on experience using similar measures [28,29].”
MethodNursing, psychotherapy and advanced cancer: A scoping review
Malakian, A., Mohammed, S., Fazelzad, R., Ajaj, R., Artemenko, A., & Mayo, S. J. (2021) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102090 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Expanding a Behavioral View on Digital Health Access: Drivers and Strategies to Promote Equity
Kepper, M. M., Fowler, L. A., Kusters, I. S., Davis, J. W., Baqer, M., Henson, S. J. S., Xiao, Y., Tarfa, A., Yi, J. C., Gibson, B., et al. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/51355 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“…have contributed to this growing field of digital health equity in areas such as integration of equity principles into digital interventions [16], inclusion of user-centered or co-design methods for cultural tailoring of digital health interventions [17], development of new ways to engage…”
Wang, F., Zhang, S., Song, B., & Han, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1138070 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Previous studies exhibit that CBSM improves anxiety and depression in many cancer patients (Bouchard et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2020).”
BackgroundEffect of an anti-inflammatory dietary intervention on quality of life among breast cancer survivors
Parma, D. L., Reynolds, G. L., Muñoz, E., & Ramírez, A. G. (2022) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07023-4 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Likewise, a study of advanced prostate cancer survivors showed attenuated anxiety-reducing effects, as measured by the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer, of an intervention at 12 months compared to 6-month follow-up [47].”
BackgroundPieramico, S., Castro, R., Aguiar, S., Bismarck, F., Ferreira, D. H., Carvalho, J., Quinta-Gomes, A. L., & Nobre, P. J. (2023) · Sexual Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1093/sxmrev/qead024 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Psychosocial Interventions in Cancer
Benedict, C., Walsh, E. A., & Penedo, F. J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85702-8_10 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationOptimal assessment of quality of life for patients with prostate cancer
Briggs, L. G., Sentana‐Lledo, D., Lage, D. E., Trinh, Q., & Morgans, A. K. (2022) · Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology · doi:10.1177/17588359221141306 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Goodman, W., Bagnall, A., Ashley, L., Azizoddin, D. R., Muehlensiepen, F., Blum, D., Bennett, M., & Allsop, M. J. (2022) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/33355 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Figure 4 [29-68] shows the modes of delivery of each intervention and where interventions use multiple modes, with the names in bold involving multiple health professionals.”
BackgroundInfluentialYuan, Y., Liu, X., Cui, Y., Shi, L., & Ye, X. (2023) · Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) · doi:10.1007/s11845-023-03501-8 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Interestingly, the clinical effects of CBSM on alleviating anxiety and depression, and improving the quality of life have been revealed in some cancer patients, such as breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and advanced prostate cancer [14, 17, 18].”
Supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers: a scoping review
Saab, M. M., McCarthy, M. J., Murphy, M. F., Medved, K., O’Malley, M., Bambury, R. M., Gleeson, J. P., & Noonan, B. J. (2023) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-023-07984-0 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“’s cognitive behavioural stress management intervention is one such example associated with a significant improvement in anxiety amongst racially diverse PCa patients at 6 and 12 months when compared to a health promotion control alone [40].”
ResultWalsh, E. A., Post, K. E., Massad, K., Horick, N., Antoni, M. H., Penedo, F. J., Safren, S. A., Partridge, A. H., Peppercorn, J. M., Park, E. R., et al. (2024) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-023-07228-z · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Additionally, other cognitive behavioral trials have shown differential treatment response as a function of patient factors [53, 54].”
Self-citationMikkonen, H., Hökkä, M., Saarto, T., Stenberg, J.-H., & Junttila, K. (2025) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/spcare-2024-005043 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Racial Disparities and Mental Health Effects Within Prostate Cancer
Conant, K., Huynh, H. N., Chan, J., et al. (2022) · Health Psychology Research · doi:10.52965/001c.39654 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Kim, J., Gray, J. A., & Johnson, H. (2021) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2020.0541 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Chronic Stress, Biobehavioral Processes and Health Implications in Understanding Disparities
Kronenfeld, J. P., Antoni, M. H., & Penedo, F. J. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37638-2_3
Self-citationGoodman, W., Bagnall, A., Ashley, L., et al. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.33355
Telemedicine Acceptance Among Older Adult Patients With Cancer: Scoping Review (Preprint)Preprint
Pang, N. Q., Lau, J., Fong, S.-Y., et al. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.28724
- Authors
- Bouchard, L. C., Yanez, B., Dahn, J. R., Flury, S. C., Perry, K. T., Mohr, D. C., & Penedo, F. J.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Bruce W. Carter VA Medical Center (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Penedo, Frank J
- Venue
- Translational Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-10-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 629-637
- ISSN
- 1613-9860 (ISSN-L)
- 1869-6716
- PMC
- PMC7184868
- OpenAlex
- W2895563350
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Translational Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (T32CA193193)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA157809)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- advanced prostate cancer, psychosocial interventions, cognitive-behavioral stress management, racial disparities, Black men, treatment acceptability, older men, health promotion
- MeSH terms
- Psychosocial Support Systems, Aged, Anxiety, Black or African American, Counseling, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Telemedicine, Efficiency, Organizational, Computers, Handheld
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review