Cited by 26Cancer survivorship and careDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Brief report of a tablet-delivered psychosocial intervention for men with advanced prostate cancer: Acceptability and efficacy by race

Open access
Bouchard, Laura C, Yanez, Betina, Dahn, Jason R, Flury, Sarah C, Perry, Kent T, Mohr, David C, Penedo, Frank J·2019·Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Relative to non-Hispanic whites (NHW), black men are disproportionately affected by prostate cancer (PC) incidence, have poorer PC outcomes, and report greater compromises in health-related quality of life. Despite these challenges, black men are underrepresented in psychosocial cancer research, possibly due to limited access to supportive oncology programs. The purpose of this article is to examine the acceptability and efficacy for reducing disease-specific distress of a tablet-delivered psychosocial intervention for older men with advanced PC (APC) and explore differences by race. Men with APC (N = 192, 37.5% black, age M = 68.84 years) were randomized to 10-week Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) or attention-control Health Promotion (HP), both delivered via tablets. Assessments occurred at baseline in person, weekly during the 10-week program via tablets, and at 6 and 12 months in person. Weekly session evaluations and postprogram exit surveys assessed acceptability. Efficacy was assessed with a measure of PC-anxiety validated with racially diverse PC patients using linear mixed effects modeling. Study retention and group attendance did not differ by race. CBSM and HP were both acceptable among older APC patients. Black men rated both conditions more favorably than NHW men. Men in CBSM (vs. HP) reported greater reductions in PC-anxiety at 6 months (not sustained at 12 months). Black men in CBSM reported greater decreases in PC-anxiety over time compared with all other groups. Tablet-delivered CBSM and HP were acceptable for black and NHW APC patients, although black men rated both conditions more favorably. Black men reported a unique intervention benefit related to reduced disease-specific distress. © 2018 Society of Behavioral Medicine 2018. All rights reserved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/tbm/iby089

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

16 of 32 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    Black men in CBSM reported lower MAX-PC scores at T2 and T3 compared with other samples of APC.

    “Black men in CBSM reported lower MAX-PC scores at T2 and T3 compared with other samples of APC [20].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Johanes, 2013, Anxiety level of early- and late-stage prostate cancer patients, Prostate Int source

      The Results section compares MAX-PC scores in early- and advanced-stage prostate cancer patients, not Black men receiving CBSM. A search of our full-text copy found no CBSM group, T2 or T3 measurements, or comparison with other APC samples. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    The proportion of black men in this study (37.5%) is higher than most other psychosocial research in PC (8-20%).

    “In our sample of older men with APC, more than one third of the participants were black men (37.5%).This proportion of black men is higher than most other psychosocial research in PC, which ranges from 8% to 20% of reported samples [24][25][26][27].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [24] Parker, 2009, The effects of a presurgical stress management intervention for men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy, J Clin Oncol source
    • cites [25] Lepore, 2003, Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions, Health Psychol source
    • cites [26] Northouse, 2007, Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses, Cancer source
  • Findingown data

    At baseline, there was no difference in MAX-PC scores between NHW and black men.

    “At baseline, there was no difference in MAX-PC scores between NHW and black men, and scores were similar to those reported in other samples of APC [19].”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “In our sample, before intervention, we did not find evidence of disparities related to PC-anxiety in this sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Nelson, 2016, Assessing anxiety in Black men with prostate cancer: further data on the reliability and validity of the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC), Support Care Cancer source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says prior studies found anxiety in Black men was no higher than in White men, and compares this Black sample with earlier, primarily White validation samples. But it also says this study had no non-Black control group, so it cannot establish that NHW and Black men had no difference in baseline MAX-PC scores. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The MAX-PC has been validated with black and APC patients.

    “The 18-item Memorial Anxiety Scale for PC (MAX-PC) assesses PC-related anxiety [18] and has been validated with black and APC patients [19,20].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [19] Nelson, 2016, Assessing anxiety in Black men with prostate cancer: further data on the reliability and validity of the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC), Support Care Cancer source
    • cites [20] Johanes, 2013, Anxiety level of early- and late-stage prostate cancer patients, Prostate Int source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) calls MAX-PC a valid and reliable method for identifying prostate-cancer-related anxiety. The Data collection section (page unavailable) says earlier studies validated the questionnaire, but this paper does not say it was validated with Black or APC patients; its own study used a modified 11-question version in early- and advanced-stage patients. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    There was no interaction of time and condition on MAX-PC scores within white participants.

    “There was no interaction of time and condition on MAX-PC scores within white participants (p > .05).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
  • May combine two claims. 20
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Across time, men in both conditions reported MAX-PC scores that remained within 1 SD of scores reported in other samples of APC.

    “Across time, men in both conditions reported MAX-PC scores that remained within 1 SD of scores reported in other samples of APC [20].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Johanes, 2013, Anxiety level of early- and late-stage prostate cancer patients, Prostate Int source

      The Results report mean MAX-PC scores of 8.32 and 12.61 for early- and advanced-stage patients. The Discussion compares this study’s overall mean with another sample’s mean of 9.3 ± 6.8; both group means fall within one standard deviation of that figure. But this was a cross-sectional comparison of disease stages, not a study of two conditions followed across time, so the longitudinal claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Elevated distress is reported in 16-31% of PC patients.

    “Elevated distress is reported in 16-31% of PC patients, and approximately 6% of patients meet criteria for a psychiatric disorder (e.g., mood disorders) [2,3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] Roth, 1998, Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study, Cancer source
    • cites [3] Mehnert, 2010, Depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and health-related quality of life and its association with social support in ambulatory prostate cancer patients, Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) source

      The Psychological co-morbidity and HRQOL section reports increased psychological distress or a probable psychiatric disorder in 16.2% of the study's ambulatory prostate cancer patients. The Introduction reports a wider 13–53% range across studies, but the paper does not report the claimed 16–31% range; only its lower end is supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Black men are more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic disease (stage IV).

    “Black men are also more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic disease (stage IV) [5] for which the 5-year survival rate drops to 30% [1], and black men are 2.4 times more likely to die from PC compared with NHW men [3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Anai, 2006, Prostate cancer screening and detection in inner-city and underserved men, J Natl Med Assoc source

      The Results (abstract; page unavailable) report that African American men in this inner-city cohort more often had advanced disease or distant metastasis than the comparison groups (16.1% versus 3.8% and 0%). The paper combines T3/T4, N1, and M1 cases, so it does not establish a higher rate specifically of metastatic (stage IV) diagnoses. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Another study found evidence of protective resiliency among black PC patients.

    “Two studies found lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in black PC patients relative to NHW patients [6,7], whereas another study found evidence of protective resiliency among black PC patients [8].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Nelson, 2010, Distress, anxiety, depression, and emotional well-being in African-American men with prostate cancer, Psychooncology source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Black men are 2.4 times more likely to die from PC compared with NHW men.

    “Black men are also more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic disease (stage IV) [5] for which the 5-year survival rate drops to 30% [1], and black men are 2.4 times more likely to die from PC compared with NHW men [3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Mehnert, 2010, Depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and health-related quality of life and its association with social support in ambulatory prostate cancer patients, Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) source

      The Introduction discusses prostate cancer incidence and psychosocial distress, while the results address psychological outcomes in ambulatory patients; neither reports mortality by race. Searches for the 2.4-fold mortality figure and Black-versus-non-Hispanic-White comparisons found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    We used a measure validated specifically with black and APC patients to assess preliminary efficacy, increasing the validity of our findings.

    “We also used a measure validated specifically with black and APC patients to assess preliminary efficacy, increasing the validity of our findings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [19] Nelson, 2016, Assessing anxiety in Black men with prostate cancer: further data on the reliability and validity of the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC), Support Care Cancer source

      The Discussion reports that the MAX-PC was reliable and valid in a sample of Black men with prostate cancer. The Methods (Participants) say the sample included both early- and late-stage disease, but the paper does not establish validation specifically for advanced prostate cancer patients as a separate group. The statement that using the measure increased the citing study’s validity is the citing authors’ own conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [20] Johanes, 2013, Anxiety level of early- and late-stage prostate cancer patients, Prostate Int source

      The Data collection section (page unavailable) says the study used the MAX-PC anxiety questionnaire and reports that it had been validated in studies in New York and Rotterdam. It does not say the measure was validated specifically with Black and APC patients or used to assess preliminary efficacy; this study assessed anxiety in early- and advanced-stage prostate cancer patients. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Our team has adapted CBSM for older men with APC, and we have shown preliminary feasibility and acceptability in a small sample.

    “Our team has adapted a psychosocial intervention (Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management [CBSM]) [11] for older men with advanced PC (APC; stages III-IV), and we have shown preliminary feasibility and acceptability in a small sample [12].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Penedo, 2008 source
    • cites [12] Yanez, 2015, Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a technology-assisted psychosocial intervention for racially diverse men with advanced prostate cancer, Cancer source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The following rates were deemed acceptable based on prior studies of advanced or metastatic cancer patients: 70% retention and 70% average session attendance.

    “We tracked study retention and attendance, and the following rates were deemed acceptable based on prior studies of advanced or metastatic cancer patients: 70% retention and 70% average session attendance [16,17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [16] Campbell, 2007, Facilitating research participation and improving quality of life for African American prostate cancer survivors and their intimate partners. A pilot study of telephone-based coping skills training, Cancer source

      The Recruitment and retention section (page not available) reports that 15 of 20 treatment couples completed treatment and describes session adherence, but gives no 70% acceptability threshold. Searches for 70% retention, 70% average session attendance, and prior studies of advanced or metastatic cancer patients found no passage establishing those criteria. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [17] Kissane, 2007, Supportive-expressive group therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: survival and psychosocial outcome from a randomized controlled trial, Psychooncology source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Men in CBSM versus HP reported greater reductions in PC-anxiety at 6 months, but this benefit was not sustained at 12 months.

    “Men in CBSM (vs.HP) reported greater reductions in PC-anxiety at 6 months (not sustained at 12 months).”
    • Also stated in: § Efficacy: PC-anxiety · plain
      “From T1 to T2, there was a more negative slope in CBSM vs. HP (b = -2.69,SE = 1.05, p = .011),but this was not sustained at T3 (p > .05).”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “Exploratory analyses of efficacy for reducing disease-specific distress in the total sample revealed an overall intervention effect on decreased PC-anxiety at 6 months, but this benefit was not sustained at 12 months.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Men in CBSM versus HP had lower MAX-PC scores at T2, but not at T3.

    “Men in CBSM versus HP had lower MAX-PC scores at T2 (p = .025),but not T3 (p > .05).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All other groups (black men in HP, NHW men in CBSM, NHW men in HP) did not report significant changes in MAX-PC scores over time.

    “By comparison, all other groups did not report significant changes in MAX-PC scores over time (i.e., black men in HP, NHW men in CBSM, NHW men in HP).”
    • Also stated in: § Efficacy: PC-anxiety · plain
      “For black participants in the HP condition, MAX-PC scores did not change from T1 to T2 or T1 to T3 (ps > .05).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Average exit survey responses were favorable and similar for CBSM and HP.

    “Average exit survey responses were favorable and similar for CBSM (M = 3.53, SD = 0.55) and HP (M = 3.65, SD = 0.41; p > .05).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Within CBSM, MAX-PC scores were significantly lower at T2 versus T1, and this was maintained at T3.

    “Pairwise comparisons showed that, within CBSM, MAX-PC scores were significantly lower at T2 versus T1 (p < .001),and this was maintained at T3 (p = .011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    CBSM and HP were both acceptable among older APC patients.

    “CBSM and HP were both acceptable among older APC patients.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “Tablet-delivered CBSM and attention-matched HP were both acceptable to this sample, and participants were engaged with both conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Black men in CBSM reported a significant reduction in PC-anxiety at 6 months, which was maintained at 12 months.

    “Black men in CBSM reported a significant reduction in PC-anxiety at 6 months, which was maintained at 12 months.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Black men reported lower SES (e.g., lower education and income) compared to NHW men in this sample.

    “There were demographic differences between NHW and black men across study conditions; black men reported lower SES (e.g., lower education and income) compared to NHW men in this sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Within HP, MAX-PC scores did not change from T1 to T2 or T1 to T3.

    “Within HP, MAX-PC scores did not change from T1 to T2 or T1 to T3 (ps > .05).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Black men were more likely to be recruited from the VA medical center than NHW men.

    “Black men were also more likely to be recruited from the VA medical center than NHW men.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were 24 adverse events during the study (6 hospitalizations, 17 deaths, and 1 new cancer diagnosis).

    “There were 24 adverse events during the study (6 hospitalizations, 17 deaths including men lost to follow up and after the T3 assessment, and 1 new cancer diagnosis).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Baseline MAX-PC scores were higher in CBSM than in HP.

    “There were no differences between men randomized to CBSM and HP on demographic or medical variables, but baseline MAX-PC scores were higher in CBSM.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All adverse events were unrelated to the present study's treatment.

    “All adverse events were unrelated to the present study's treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Older age and lower socioeconomic status are barriers to recruitment and retention in psychosocial cancer research.

    “Older age and lower socioeconomic status (SES) are barriers as well, as they frequently relate to study design barriers (e.g., age restrictions, functional status) [9].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Ford, 2008, Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review, Cancer source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All participants gave informed consent, approved by the IRB at each institution.

    “All participants gave informed consent (approved by the IRB at each institution).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    We used linear mixed effects modeling to assess three models of change in MAX-PC scores over time controlling for age, comorbidities, and baseline MAX-PC scores.

    “We used linear mixed effects modeling to assess three models of change in MAX-PC scores over time controlling for age, comorbidities [22], and baseline MAX-PC scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Chipperfield, 2013, Predictors of depression, anxiety and quality of life in patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy, Psychooncology source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    We analyzed MAX-PC for normality and Winsorized outliers of >3 SD from the mean.

    “We analyzed MAX-PC for normality and Winsorized outliers of >3 SD from the mean [21].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Wilcox, 1993, Some results on a Winsorized correlation coefficient, Br J Math Stat Psychol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    All participants were provided tablets, which limits generalization to individuals without access to mobile technology.

    “All participants were provided tablets, which limits generalization to individuals without access to mobile technology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All data available were used to estimate models, so that participants were included at each time point for which they provided data (as opposed to listwise deletion).

    “All data available were used to estimate models, so that participants were included at each time point for which they provided data (as opposed to listwise deletion).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CBSM integrates cognitive-behavioral stress and self-management skills with relaxation skills training to improve HRQoL and reduce symptoms.

    “CBSM integrates cognitive-behavioral stress and self-management skills (e.g., cognitive restructuring) with relaxation skills training (e.g., deep breathing) to improve HRQoL and reduce symptoms [11].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Penedo, 2008 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were randomized (1:1) to CBSM or HP, and groups were stratified by disease status (advanced vs. metastatic disease).

    “Participants were randomized (1:1) to CBSM or HP (four to six men per condition), and groups were stratified by disease status (advanced vs. metastatic disease).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    We adjusted pairwise comparisons with Sidak correction for multiple comparisons.

    “We adjusted pairwise comparisons with Sidak correction for multiple comparisons [23].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Sidak, 1967, Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions, J Am Stat Assoc

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Black men face unique barriers limiting their involvement in clinical trials, such as limited awareness of trials and lower acceptance into trials.

    “Black men face unique barriers limiting their involvement in clinical trials such as limited awareness of trials and lower acceptance into trials [9,10].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] Ford, 2008, Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review, Cancer source
    • cites [10] Rivers, 2013, A systematic review of the factors influencing African Americans’ participation in cancer clinical trials, Contemp Clin Trials source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    PC disproportionately affects black men, with 70% higher incidence than NHW men.

    “PC disproportionately affects black men, with 70% higher incidence than non-Hispanic white (NHW) men [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] American Cancer Society

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Sessions were recorded and reviewed in weekly supervision with licensed clinical psychologists trained in both protocols to ensure intervention fidelity.

    “Sessions were recorded and reviewed in weekly supervision with licensed clinical psychologists trained in both protocols to ensure intervention fidelity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    We projected that with 150 participants retained at T3 and a .05 alpha level, we would have a power of 0.86 for detecting intervention effects on HRQoL.

    “We projected that with 150 participants retained at T3 and a .05alpha level, we would have a power of 0.86 for detecting intervention effects on HRQoL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    We did not collect information about race prior to study enrollment because race was not part of our eligibility criteria; consequently, differences in recruitment by race could not be assessed.

    “We did not collect information about race prior to study enrollment because race was not part of our eligibility criteria; consequently, differences in recruitment by race could not be assessed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
35 of 35
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Administering the intervention via tablets reduces barriers to recruiting and retaining minority men (black men).

    “In the study design, we made efforts to reduce barriers to recruiting and retaining minority men (i.e., black men), including administration of the intervention via tablets.”
1 of 1

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • HP attendance test has too many degrees of freedom for the stated racial groups

    Minor

    The HP attendance row reports a comparison between 55 NHW and 35 black participants, but its t-test has 91 degrees of freedom. An ordinary two-group t-test using all 90 participants would have 88 degrees of freedom, and missing attendance data would reduce that number further.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouchard, L. C., Yanez, B., Dahn, J. R., Flury, S. C., Perry, K. T., Mohr, D. C., & Penedo, F. J.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Bruce W. Carter VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Penedo, Frank J
Venue
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Published
2018-10-03
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
629-637
ISSN
  • 1613-9860 (ISSN-L)
  • 1869-6716
OpenAlex
W2895563350
Cited by
24
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (T32CA193193)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA157809)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
advanced prostate cancer, psychosocial interventions, cognitive-behavioral stress management, racial disparities, Black men, treatment acceptability, older men, health promotion
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Support Systems, Aged, Anxiety, Black or African American, Counseling, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Telemedicine, Efficiency, Organizational, Computers, Handheld

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review