The DOI matches its Crossref record.
OPTIMAL INTERPOLATION AND ISARITHMIC MAPPING OF SOIL PROPERTIES: I THE SEMI‐VARIOGRAM AND PUNCTUAL KRIGING
Abstract
Summary: Kriging is a means of spatial prediction that can be used for soil properties. It is a form of weighted local averaging. It is optimal in the sense that it provides estimates of values at unrecorded places without bias and with minimum and known variance. Isarithmic maps made by kriging are alternatives to conventional soil maps where properties can be measured at close spacings. Kriging depends on first computing an accurate semi‐variogram, which measures the nature of spatial dependence for the property. Estimates of semi‐variance are then used to determine the weights applied to the data when computing the averages, and are presented in the kriging equations. The method is applied to three sets of data from detailed soil surveys in Central Wales and Norfolk. Sodium content at Plas Gogerddan was shown to vary isotropically with a linear semi‐variogram. Simple punctual kriging produced a map with intricate isarithms and fairly large estimation variance, attributed to a large nugget effect. Sloniness on the same land varied anisotropically with a linear semi‐variogram. and again the estimation error of punctual kriging was fairly large. At Hole Farm. Norfolk, the thickness of cover loam varied isotropically, but with a spherical semi‐variogram. Its parameters were estimated and used to krige point values and produce a map showing substantial short‐range variation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spatial data analysis: theory and practice
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3486 · Cited by 965
The threat of soil salinity: A European scale review
Daliakopoulos, I. N., Tsanis, I. K., Koutroulis, A., Kourgialas, N. N., Varouchakis, A. E., Karatzas, G. P., & Ritsema, C. J. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.177 · Cited by 828
Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation
BURROUGH, P. A. (1989) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1989.tb01290.x · Cited by 503
Statistical analysis of spatial expression patterns for spatially resolved transcriptomic studies
Sun, S., Zhu, J., & Zhou, X. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0701-7 · Cited by 502
Geostatistical Patterns of Soil Heterogeneity Around Individual Perennial Plants
Jackson, R. B., & Caldwell, M. M. (1993) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261666 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- BURGESS, T. M., & WEBSTER, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 315-331
- ISSN
- 0022-4588 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062599367
- Cited by
- 861
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OPTIMAL INTERPOLATION AND ISARITHMIC MAPPING OF SOIL PROPERTIES: I THE SEMI‐VARIOGRAM AND PUNCTUAL KRIGING. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1980.tb02084.x
- The paper
- BURGESS, T. M., & WEBSTER, R. (1980). OPTIMAL INTERPOLATION AND ISARITHMIC MAPPING OF SOIL PROPERTIES: I THE SEMI‐VARIOGRAM AND PUNCTUAL KRIGING. Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1980.tb02084.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.