Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 490

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Geostatistical Patterns of Soil Heterogeneity Around Individual Perennial Plants

Jackson, R. B., Caldwell, M. M.·1993·The Journal of Ecology

Abstract

1 Univariate, multivariate, and geostatistical techniques were used to quantify the scale and degree of soil variability around individual perennial sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana) and bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata ssp. spicata) plants. This variability was then compared to that found across the larger sagebrush-steppe site. Samples were taken every metre in a 10-m x 12-m grid and every 12.5 cm in nine nested 0.5-m x 0.5-m grids containing at least one Artemisia shrub or Pseudoroegneria tussock (362 total samples). The 11 soil properties meas- ured were organic matter, pH, water content, live root mass, microbial respiration, net N mineralization, nitrification potential, and soil-extractable ammonium, nitrate, phosphate, and potassium. 2 There was considerable biological variation in many of the properties measured. Soil organic matter varied from 1.3% to 7.4% within the 10-m x 12-m area and pH varied by as much as 1.3 pH units among samples less than 50 cm apart. Samples showing strong negative N mineralization (N immobilization) were only 12.5 cm from samples showing strong positive N mineralization. 3 Spearman rank-correlation coefficients between pairs of the 11 soil parameters showed a number of strong, positive associations between some variables (e.g. phos- phate and potassium, r, = 0.64), but not others (e.g. ammonium and organic matter, rs= 0.013). 4 Semivariograms for soil organic matter and pH showed strong spatial autocorrela- tion at distances of less than 1 m, and both showed a high spatial dependence of c. 90%. A combined index of soil fertility (incorporating information on soil ammonium, nitrate, phosphate, and potassium) also showed strong autocorrelation at scales of less than 1 metre. None of the microbial processes analysed (net N mineralization, nitrifica- tion potential, or microbial respiration) showed any significant autocorrelation, even at the finest measurement scale of 12.5 cm. 5 Kriged (interpolated) contour plots of soil organic matter, phosphate, and potas- sium showed strong spatial patterning associated with the tussock grasses, but less consistent patterning for the sagebrush plants. From the degree and scale of variabil- ity seen in this study and previously, we conclude that root plasticity and active forag- ing in a heterogeneous soil environment are likely to be important to the nutrient balance of many plants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2261666

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 490

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, R. B., & Caldwell, M. M.
Venue
The Journal of Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1993-12
Volume
81
Issue
4
Pages
683
ISSN
0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062482781
Cited by
490
References
20
FWCI
16.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geostatistical Patterns of Soil Heterogeneity Around Individual Perennial Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2261666
The paper
Jackson, R. B., & Caldwell, M. M. (1993). Geostatistical Patterns of Soil Heterogeneity Around Individual Perennial Plants. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261666

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.