Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Land‐use effects on the composition of organic matter in particle‐size separates of soils: II. CPMAS and solution 13 C NMR analysis

GUGGENBERGER, G., ZECH, W., HAUMAIER, L., CHRISTENSEN, B.T.·1995·European Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Summary: Soils from A horizons of Eutrochrepts under spruce forest (Sf), mixed deciduous forest (Df), permanent grassland (Gp), and arable rotation (Ar) were fractionated into clay‐ (<2 μm), silt‐(2–20 μm) and sand‐ (20–2000 μm) sized separates. 13 C NMR spectroscopy was used to compare SOM composition across size separates and between land‐use regimes. CPMAS 13 C NMR spectroscopy showed that the intensity of signals assigned to carbohydrates (representing most O‐alkyl C) and lignin (phenolic and methoxyl C) declined with decreasing particle size. Concurrently, alkyl C and C‐substitution of aromatic C increased in the order sand, silt, clay. The amount of alkyl C correlated well with microbial resynthesis of carbohydrates. Solution 13 C NMR spectra suggested that humic acids (HA) extracted from the size separates were richer in carboxyl C and aromatic C than the bulk size separates. Also HA reflected increasing percentage of alkyl C with decreasing particle size. O‐alkyl C were lower in silt HA than in clay HA whereas aromatic C tended to peak in silt HA. These results suggested that sand‐sized separates were enriched in plant residues (primary resources) whereas clay‐sized separates were dominated by products of microbial resynthesis (secondary resources). Silt was rich in selectively preserved and microbially transformed primary resources. 13 C NMR spectroscopy showed only small differences in SOM composition between land‐use regimes, except that silt and silt HA from Ar were richer in aromatic C than those from the other plots. But enrichment factors ( E = content in fraction/content in whole soil) revealed differences in the distribution of C species across the size separates. Relatively high E aromatic (0.9) and E o‐alkyl (1.0) for sand from Gp indicated high amounts of plant residues, probably due to intense rhizodeposition and to occlusion of plant debris within aggregates. Low E aromatic (0.3) and E o‐alkyl (0.3) for sand from Ar suggested depletion of primary resources, which could be attributed to disintegration of soil aggregates upon cultivation. A pronounced enrichment of alkyl C in Ar clay‐sized separates ( E alkyl = 3.1) suggested large amounts of microbial carbon. Microbial products attached to clay surfaces by a variety of physico‐chemical bondings appeared more stable against mineralization induced by cultivation than plant residues sequestered in aggregates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1995.tb01821.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
GUGGENBERGER, G., ZECH, W., HAUMAIER, L., & CHRISTENSEN, B. T.
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-03
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
147-158
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W2063602175
Cited by
203
References
1
FWCI
21.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Land‐use effects on the composition of organic matter in particle‐size separates of soils: II. CPMAS and solution 13 C NMR analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1995.tb01821.x
The paper
GUGGENBERGER, G., ZECH, W., HAUMAIER, L., & CHRISTENSEN, B. T. (1995). Land‐use effects on the composition of organic matter in particle‐size separates of soils: II. CPMAS and solution 13 C NMR analysis. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1995.tb01821.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.