Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of crystallinity of goethite: II. Rates of sorption and desorption of phosphate

STRAUSS, R., BRÜMMER, G.W., BARROW, N.J.·1997·European Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Summary: Eight samples of goethite ranging in surface area from 18 to 132 m 2 g ‐1 were mixed with phosphate at a range of pH values for periods which ranged from 0·5 h to 6 weeks. The sample with a surface area of 18 m 2 g ‐1 had been hydrothermally treated to improve its crystallinity. Its rate of reaction with phosphate depended on pH but was complete within a day. Its maximum observed reaction was close to the theoretical maximum for surface adsorption of 2·5 μmol m −2 . For the other samples, phosphate continued to react for up to 3 weeks and exceeded the value of 2·5 μmole m −2 . The duration and extent of the reaction depended on the crystallinity of the goethite. The results were closely described by a model in which the phosphate ions were initially adsorbed on to charged external surfaces. The phosphate ions then diffused into the particles. This was closely described using equations for diffusion into a cylinder. Samples of goethite which had been loaded with phosphate dissolved more slowly in HCl, and had a longer lag phase, than phosphate‐free goethite. For the hydrothermally treated goethite, HCl removed much of the phosphate when only a small proportion of the iron had been dissolved. For a poorly crystallized goethite, it was necessary to dissolve much more of the iron to obtain a similar removal of phosphate. Brief treatment with NaOH removed most of the phosphate from the hydrothermally treated goethite but only half the phosphate from a poorly crystallized goethite. These results are consistent with the idea that phosphate ions were not only bound on external surface sites but had also penetrated into meso‐ and micro‐pores between the domains of the goethite crystals and were then adsorbed on internal surface sites. This penetration tied the domains together more firmly thus increasing the lag phase for dissolution. Differences between sites for phosphate adsorption are therefore caused mainly by their location on either external or internal sites. Models that ignore this are incomplete.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00189.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
STRAUSS, R., BRÜMMER, G. W., & BARROW, N. J.
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-03
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
101-114
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W2162299892
Cited by
224
References
0
FWCI
12.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of crystallinity of goethite: II. Rates of sorption and desorption of phosphate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00189.x
The paper
STRAUSS, R., BRÜMMER, G. W., & BARROW, N. J. (1997). Effects of crystallinity of goethite: II. Rates of sorption and desorption of phosphate. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00189.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.