Cited by 58Phosphorus and nutrient managementAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalClay minerals and soil interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modifications to the Freundlich equation to describe anion sorption over a large range and to describe competition between pairs of ions

Open access
Barrow, N. J., Cartes, P., Mora, M. L.·2005·European Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Summary We measured sorption of selenite and phosphate, both separately and in competition, in a Chilean Andisol. We also used previously published data for competitive sorption of arsenate and phosphate by a clay subsoil. We wrote computer programs that allowed us to compare the fits of differing versions of equations to describe individual sorption and competitive sorption. For the selenite–phosphate data, the index term of the Freundlich equation decreased as concentration increased. This was described using the Sibbesen modification of the Freundlich equation. This modification was then included in competition equations. For both the selenite–phosphate and the arsenate–phosphate data, competition was not ‘symmetrical’, that is, the competition terms were not reciprocals of each other. We think this occurred because competition between ions is not only competition for adsorption sites but also involves electrical effects that follow penetration of the surface.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00700.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 58

Metadata

Authors
Barrow, N. J., Cartes, P., & Mora, M. L.
Affiliations
Universidad de La Frontera (CL)
Corresponding author
Barrow, N. J.
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01-13
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
601-606
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W2054824475
Cited by
58
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Soil Science (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Omeka S (Universidad de La Frontera) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Clay minerals and soil interactions
Keywords
anion sorption, competitive adsorption, Freundlich isotherm, selenite, phosphate, arsenate, volcanic ash soil, clay subsoil, adsorption site competition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review