Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Organo‐mineral associations in sandy acid forest soils: importance of specific surface area, iron oxides and micropores

Eusterhues, K., Rumpel, C., Kögel‐Knabner, I.·2005·European Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Summary: Organo‐mineral associations stabilize soil organic matter, though the mechanisms by which they do so are unclear. We used particle‐size fractions < 6.3 μm of two soils to examine the importance of Fe oxides, short‐range order Al silicates and the surface areas of minerals and micropores on the formation of organo‐mineral associations. In the subsoil Fe oxides were most strongly statistically correlated with the mineral‐bound organic carbon. We therefore assume that they are the most important substrates for the formation of organo‐mineral associations. There is no indication that this is caused by physical protection of organic matter in their micropores (< 2 nm). In the Haplic Podzol, dithionite–citrate–bicarbonate‐soluble short‐range order Al silicates may also play a role. Fe oxide particles were calculated to offer specific surface areas of ∼ 200 m 2 g −1 (goethite) and ∼ 800 m 2 g −1 (ferrihydrite), corresponding to crystal diameters of only a few nm. We assume that the resulting large amount of oxide‐specific reactive surface sites (conditionally charged hydroxyl groups) is responsible for their dominant role as sorbents. With maximum C loadings of 1.3 mg C per m 2 Fe oxide for the Dystric Cambisol and 1.1 mg C per m 2 Fe oxide + short‐range order Al silicates for the Haplic Podzol the subsoils of both soils seem to have reached saturation with respect to organic matter sorption. In contrast to subsoil horizons, organo‐mineral associations from topsoils contain much larger amounts of organic matter. Here a larger C loading on Fe oxides or a greater importance of other sorbents in addition to the oxides must be assumed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00710.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Eusterhues, K., Rumpel, C., & Kögel‐Knabner, I.
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03-23
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
753-763
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W2021331689
Cited by
318
References
1
FWCI
11.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organo‐mineral associations in sandy acid forest soils: importance of specific surface area, iron oxides and micropores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00710.x
The paper
Eusterhues, K., Rumpel, C., & Kögel‐Knabner, I. (2005). Organo‐mineral associations in sandy acid forest soils: importance of specific surface area, iron oxides and micropores. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00710.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.