The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organo‐mineral associations in sandy acid forest soils: importance of specific surface area, iron oxides and micropores
Abstract
Summary: Organo‐mineral associations stabilize soil organic matter, though the mechanisms by which they do so are unclear. We used particle‐size fractions < 6.3 μm of two soils to examine the importance of Fe oxides, short‐range order Al silicates and the surface areas of minerals and micropores on the formation of organo‐mineral associations. In the subsoil Fe oxides were most strongly statistically correlated with the mineral‐bound organic carbon. We therefore assume that they are the most important substrates for the formation of organo‐mineral associations. There is no indication that this is caused by physical protection of organic matter in their micropores (< 2 nm). In the Haplic Podzol, dithionite–citrate–bicarbonate‐soluble short‐range order Al silicates may also play a role. Fe oxide particles were calculated to offer specific surface areas of ∼ 200 m 2 g −1 (goethite) and ∼ 800 m 2 g −1 (ferrihydrite), corresponding to crystal diameters of only a few nm. We assume that the resulting large amount of oxide‐specific reactive surface sites (conditionally charged hydroxyl groups) is responsible for their dominant role as sorbents. With maximum C loadings of 1.3 mg C per m 2 Fe oxide for the Dystric Cambisol and 1.1 mg C per m 2 Fe oxide + short‐range order Al silicates for the Haplic Podzol the subsoils of both soils seem to have reached saturation with respect to organic matter sorption. In contrast to subsoil horizons, organo‐mineral associations from topsoils contain much larger amounts of organic matter. Here a larger C loading on Fe oxides or a greater importance of other sorbents in addition to the oxides must be assumed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mineral surface control of organic carbon in black shale
Kennedy, M. J., Pevear, D. R., & Hill, R. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066611 · Cited by 611
Cited by
SOM fractionation methods: Relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms
von Lützow, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Flessa, H., Guggenberger, G., Matzner, E., & Marschner, B. (2007) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007 · Cited by 1,590
Self-citationLinkages between aggregate formation, porosity and soil chemical properties
Regelink, I. C., Stoof, C. R., Rousseva, S., Weng, L., Lair, G. J., Kram, P., Nikolaidis, N. P., Kercheva, M., Banwart, S., & Comans, R. N. J. (2015) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.01.022 · Cited by 391
Sollins, P., Kramer, M. G., Swanston, C., Lajtha, K., Filley, T., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Wagai, R., & Bowden, R. D. (2009) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-009-9359-z · Cited by 365
Soil carbon saturation: what do we really know?
Georgiou, K., Angers, D., Champiny, R. E., Cotrufo, M. F., Craig, M. E., Doetterl, S., Grandy, A. S., Lavallee, J. M., Lin, Y., Lugato, E., et al. (2025) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.70197 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Eusterhues, K., Rumpel, C., & Kögel‐Knabner, I.
- Venue
- European Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-23
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 753-763
- ISSN
- 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2389
- OpenAlex
- W2021331689
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organo‐mineral associations in sandy acid forest soils: importance of specific surface area, iron oxides and micropores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00710.x
- The paper
- Eusterhues, K., Rumpel, C., & Kögel‐Knabner, I. (2005). Organo‐mineral associations in sandy acid forest soils: importance of specific surface area, iron oxides and micropores. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00710.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.