Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of chemical fractionation methods for isolating stable soil organic carbon pools

Helfrich, M., Flessa, H., Mikutta, R., Dreves, A., Ludwig, B.·2007·European Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Summary: Stable soil organic matter (SOM) is important for long‐term sequestration of soil organic carbon (SOC), but the usefulness of different fractionation methods to isolate stable SOM is open to question. We assessed the suitability of five chemical fractionation methods (stepwise hydrolysis, treatment with H 2 O 2 , Na 2 S 2 O 8 , NaOCl, and demineralization of the NaOCl‐resistant fraction (NaOCl + HF)) to isolate stable SOM from soil samples of a loamy sand and a silty loam under different land use regimes (grassland, forest and arable crops). The apparent C turnover time and mean age of SOC before and after fractionation was determined by 13 C and 14 C analysis. Particulate organic matter was removed by density fractionation before soils were exposed to chemical fractionation. All chemical treatments induced large SOC losses of 62–95% of the mineral‐associated SOC fraction. The amounts of H 2 O 2 ‐ and Na 2 S 2 O 8 ‐resistant SOC were independent from land use, while those of NaOCl‐ (NaOCl + HF)‐ and hydrolysis‐resistant SOC were not. All chemical treatments caused a preferential removal of young, maize‐derived SOC, with Na 2 S 2 O 8 and H 2 O 2 being most efficient. The mean 14 C age of SOC was 1000–10000 years greater after chemical fractionation than that of the initial, mineral‐associated SOC and mean 14 C ages increased in the order: NaOCl < NaOCl + HF ≤ stepwise hydrolysis ≪ H 2 O 2 ≈ Na 2 S 2 O 8 . None of the methods appeared generally suitable for the determination of the inert organic matter pool of the Rothamsted Carbon Model. Nonetheless, our results indicate that all methods are able to isolate an older, more stable SOC fraction, but treatments with H 2 O 2 and Na 2 S 2 O 8 were the most efficient ones in isolating stable SOM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00926.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Helfrich, M., Flessa, H., Mikutta, R., Dreves, A., & Ludwig, B.
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-15
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
1316-1329
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W1985450515
Cited by
181
References
5
FWCI
20.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of chemical fractionation methods for isolating stable soil organic carbon pools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00926.x
The paper
Helfrich, M., Flessa, H., Mikutta, R., Dreves, A., & Ludwig, B. (2007). Comparison of chemical fractionation methods for isolating stable soil organic carbon pools. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00926.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.