The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of chemical fractionation methods for isolating stable soil organic carbon pools
Abstract
Summary: Stable soil organic matter (SOM) is important for long‐term sequestration of soil organic carbon (SOC), but the usefulness of different fractionation methods to isolate stable SOM is open to question. We assessed the suitability of five chemical fractionation methods (stepwise hydrolysis, treatment with H 2 O 2 , Na 2 S 2 O 8 , NaOCl, and demineralization of the NaOCl‐resistant fraction (NaOCl + HF)) to isolate stable SOM from soil samples of a loamy sand and a silty loam under different land use regimes (grassland, forest and arable crops). The apparent C turnover time and mean age of SOC before and after fractionation was determined by 13 C and 14 C analysis. Particulate organic matter was removed by density fractionation before soils were exposed to chemical fractionation. All chemical treatments induced large SOC losses of 62–95% of the mineral‐associated SOC fraction. The amounts of H 2 O 2 ‐ and Na 2 S 2 O 8 ‐resistant SOC were independent from land use, while those of NaOCl‐ (NaOCl + HF)‐ and hydrolysis‐resistant SOC were not. All chemical treatments caused a preferential removal of young, maize‐derived SOC, with Na 2 S 2 O 8 and H 2 O 2 being most efficient. The mean 14 C age of SOC was 1000–10000 years greater after chemical fractionation than that of the initial, mineral‐associated SOC and mean 14 C ages increased in the order: NaOCl < NaOCl + HF ≤ stepwise hydrolysis ≪ H 2 O 2 ≈ Na 2 S 2 O 8 . None of the methods appeared generally suitable for the determination of the inert organic matter pool of the Rothamsted Carbon Model. Nonetheless, our results indicate that all methods are able to isolate an older, more stable SOC fraction, but treatments with H 2 O 2 and Na 2 S 2 O 8 were the most efficient ones in isolating stable SOM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data
Stuiver, M., & Polach, H. A. (1977) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200003672 · Cited by 5,640
Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils
Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1016125726789 · Cited by 4,633
Measured soil organic matter fractions can be related to pools in the RothC model
Zimmermann, M., Leifeld, J., Schmidt, M. W. I., Smith, P., & Fuhrer, J. (2007) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00855.x · Cited by 469
Radiocarbon Dating of Soil Organic Matter
Wang, Y., Amundson, R., & Trumbore, S. (1996) · Quaternary Research · doi:10.1006/qres.1996.0029 · Cited by 277
Paul, E. A., Collins, H. P., & Leavitt, S. W. (2001) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(01)00083-0 · Cited by 256 · cited 2×
“…acid (TFA) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) (e.g. Poirier et al., 2003; Quénéa et al., 2006) or hydrolysis using HCl in a single step (e.g. Paul et al., 2001; Plante et al., 2006), oxidative treatments using several oxidants like hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (e.g. Theng et al., 1999; Plante…”
MethodResult
Cited by
Deep soil organic matter—a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle
Rumpel, C., & Kögel-Knabner, I. (2011) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0391-5 · Cited by 1,848
Modeling consequences of straw residues export on soil organic carbon
Saffih-Hdadi, K., & Mary, B. (2008) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.08.022 · Cited by 179
Storage and turnover of carbon in grassland soils along an elevation gradient in the Swiss Alps
LEIFELD, J., ZIMMERMANN, M., FUHRER, J., & CONEN, F. (2009) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01782.x · Cited by 148
Dynamics of deep soil carbon – insights from 14 C time series across a climatic gradient
van der Voort, T. S., Mannu, U., Hagedorn, F., McIntyre, C., Walthert, L., Schleppi, P., Haghipour, N., & Eglinton, T. I. (2019) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-16-3233-2019 · Cited by 55
Soil organic carbon and nitrogen accumulation rates in cold and alpine environments over 1Ma
Egli, M., Favilli, F., Krebs, R., Pichler, B., & Dahms, D. (2012) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.03.017 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Helfrich, M., Flessa, H., Mikutta, R., Dreves, A., & Ludwig, B.
- Venue
- European Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06-15
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1316-1329
- ISSN
- 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2389
- OpenAlex
- W1985450515
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 20.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of chemical fractionation methods for isolating stable soil organic carbon pools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00926.x
- The paper
- Helfrich, M., Flessa, H., Mikutta, R., Dreves, A., & Ludwig, B. (2007). Comparison of chemical fractionation methods for isolating stable soil organic carbon pools. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00926.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.