The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computing the mean residence time of soil carbon fractions using stable isotopes: impacts of the model framework
Abstract
Soils contain the largest carbon (C) reservoir on Earth, but the mean residence time (MRT) of soil C is often poorly estimated, despite its importance for assessing the efficiency with which soils may serve as a sink for atmospheric C. The objective of this study was to evaluate how the structure of simple models of soil C dynamics affects the MRT determined from isotope‐mixing experiments, using data from field studies with either artificial labelling (FACE) or C3/C4 vegetation change. We first highlighted theoretically how non‐steady‐state conditions and the model structure (one single, two successive, or two parallel C pools) can have an impact on the MRT assessment. We then tested these different model structures against published data on the dynamics of different soil organic matter separates and their constituents. Our findings indicated that many of the reviewed studies assumed wrongly that the system was at steady state or could be described by a single‐pool approach. To select the correct model, exact knowledge of C input rates and several data points are needed from the beginning of the experiment. For steady‐state conditions an apparent temporal change of MRT computed from a single‐pool model is thus a clear indicator that a two‐pool approach must be chosen. The errors made by the wrong choice of model varied with the length of the experiment and usually resulted in an over‐estimate of MRT by a factor of 1.15 for some data published on physical size separates, but by a factor of up to 11 for individual microbial biomarkers such as muramic acid.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Assuming steady-state C inputs [135] could lead to an underestimation of MRT [136].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [136]
In the citing paper
“The evidence presented above clearly shows that there is no justification for the assumption of a steady-state sequestration rate as stated by others [8, 136].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [136]
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects
Kuzyakov, Y., Friedel, J. K., & Stahr, K. (2000) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(00)00084-5 · Cited by 3,040
Lützow, M. V., Kögel‐Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Matzner, E., Guggenberger, G., Marschner, B., & Flessa, H. (2006) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00809.x · Cited by 2,950
松永, 俊. (1997) · Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition · Cited by 996
Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe
Freibauer, A., Rounsevell, M., Smith, P., & Verhagen, A. (2004) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.021 · Cited by 920
Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: Theory and models across scales
Manzoni, S., & Porporato, A. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.031 · Cited by 788
Natural 13C abundance as a tracer for studies of soil organic matter dynamics
Balesdent, J., Mariotti, A. A., & Guillet, B. (1987) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(87)90120-9 · Cited by 720
Introduction to Geochemical Modeling
Albarède, F. (1995) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622960 · Cited by 518
Organic Carbon Turnover in Three Tropical Soils under Pasture after Deforestation
Veldkamp, E. (1994) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800010025x · Cited by 506
Boutton, T. W., Archer, S. R., Midwood, A. J., Zitzer, S. F., & Bol, R. A. (1998) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(97)00095-5 · Cited by 490
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Ågren G.I., 1998, Theoretical Ecosystem Ecology, Understanding Elements Cycles.
- Amelung W., 2008, Advances in Agronomy, 155
- Derrien D.2005.Dynamics of neutral sugar in the rhizosphere and in the bulk soil: quantification by isotope tracing and modeling.PhD thesis Marseille University Marseille France.
- Paul S., 2008, Soil organic carbon in density fractions of tropical soils under forest – pasture – secondary forest land use change., European Journal of Soil Biology, 59, 559
- 10.1002/9780470494950.ch6 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter
Liang, C. C., Amelung, W., Lehmann, J. C., & Kästner, M. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14781 · Cited by 1,932
Self-citationSoil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance
Dungait, J. A. J., Hopkins, D. W., Gregory, A. S., & Whitmore, A. P. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02665.x · Cited by 1,616
Kuzyakov, Y., Bogomolova, I., & Glaser, B. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.12.021 · Cited by 664
Poeplau, C., Don, A., Six, J., Kaiser, M., Benbi, D. K., Chenu, C., Cotrufo, M. F., Derrien, D., Gioacchini, P., Grand, S., et al. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.06.025 · Cited by 643
Self-citationAmino sugars as specific indices for fungal and bacterial residues in soil
Joergensen, R. G. (2018) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-018-1288-3 · Cited by 604
Metadata
- Authors
- Derrien, D., & Amelung, W.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Derrien, D.
- Venue
- European Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-19
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 237-252
- ISSN
- 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2389
- OpenAlex
- W1966893966
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Soil Science (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-07-BLAN-0222)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
- Keywords
- mean residence time, soil organic carbon dynamics, carbon pools, model structure, steady-state assumption, soil organic matter fractions, free-air CO2 enrichment, microbial biomarkers, muramic acid, soil carbon sink
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
