Biochar stability in soil: decomposition during eight years and transformation as assessed by compound-specific 14C analysis
Abstract
Stability and transformation products of incomplete combustion of vegetation or fossil fuel, frequently called pyrogenic or black carbon and of biochar in soil, remains unknown mainly because of their high recalcitrance compared to other natural substances. Therefore, direct estimations of biochar decomposition and transformations are difficult because 1) changes are too small for any relevant experimental period and 2) due to methodological constraints (ambiguity of the origin of investigated compounds). We used 14C-labeled biochar to trace its decomposition to CO2 during 8.5 years and transformation of its chemical compounds: neutral lipids, glycolipids, phospholipids, polysaccharides and benzenepolycarboxylic acids (BPCA).14C-labeled biochar was produced by charring 14C-labeled Lolium residues. We incubated the 14C-labeled biochar in a Haplic Luvisol and in loess for 8.5 years under controlled conditions. In total only about 6% of initially added biochar were mineralized to CO2 during the 8.5 years. This is probably the slowest decomposition obtained experimentally for any natural organic compound. The biochar decomposition rates estimated by 14CO2 efflux between the 5th and 8th years were of 7 × 10−4 % per day. This corresponds to less than 0.3% per year under optimal conditions and is about 2.5 times slower as reported from the previous shorter study (3.5 years).After 3.5 years of incubation, we analyzed 14C in dissolved organic matter, microbial biomass, and sequentially extracted neutral lipids, glycolipids, phospholipids, polysaccharides and BPCA. Biochar-derived C (14C) in microbial biomass ranged between 0.3 and 0.95% of the 14C input. Biochar-derived C in all lipid fractions was less than 1%. Over 3.5 years, glycolipids and phospholipids were decomposed 1.6 times faster (23% of their initial content per year) compared to neutral lipids (15% year−1). Polysaccharides contributed ca. 17% of the 14C activity in biochar. The highest portion of 14C in the initial biochar (87%) was in BPCA decreasing only 7% over 3.5 years. Condensed aromatic moieties were the most stable fraction compared to all other biochar compounds and the high portion of BPCA in biochar explains its very high stability and its contribution to long-term C sequestration in soil.Our new approach for analysis of biochar stability combines 14C-labeled biochar with 14C determination in chemical fractions allowed tracing of transformation products not only in released CO2 and in microbial biomass, but also evaluation of decomposition of various biochar compounds with different chemical properties.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biochar is an extremely durable material in soil.
“although biochar is an extremely durable material in soil (Kuzyakov et al., 2014)”
From Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides (2021) · cites this paper as Kuzyakov et al., 2014
Cites
Cheng, C.-H., Lehmann, J., & Engelhard, M. H. (2008) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2008.01.010 · Cited by 936 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…not applicable to the oxidation periods necessary to evaluate transformation rates of pyrogenic C. Comparing historical samples and newly produced pyrogenic C, Cheng et al. (2008a) showed its substantial oxidation during 130 years and related the oxidation intensity to the mean annual temperature.”
BackgroundStability of black carbon in soils across a climatic gradient
Cheng, C., Lehmann, J., Thies, J. E., & Burton, S. D. (2008) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2007jg000642 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Derrien, D., & Amelung, W. (2011) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01333.x · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects
Wang, J., Xiong, Z., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12266 · Cited by 1,316 · see citing works
Self-citationJoseph, S., Cowie, A. L., Van Zwieten, L., Bolan, N., Budai, A., Buss, W., Cayuela, M. L., Graber, E. R., Ippolito, J. A., Kuzyakov, Y., et al. (2021) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12885 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Self-citationIppolito, J. A., Cui, L., Kammann, C., Wrage-Mönnig, N., Estavillo, J. M., Fuertes-Mendizabal, T., Cayuela, M. L., Sigua, G., Novak, J., Spokas, K., et al. (2020) · Biochar · doi:10.1007/s42773-020-00067-x · Cited by 927 · see citing works
Domingues, R. R., Trugilho, P. F., Silva, C. A., Melo, I. C. N. A. D., Melo, L. C. A., Magriotis, Z. M., & Sánchez-Monedero, M. A. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176884 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Siedt, M., Schäffer, A., Smith, K. E. C., Nabel, M., Roß-Nickoll, M., & van Dongen, J. T. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141607 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
An overview of the effect of pyrolysis process parameters on biochar stability
Leng, L., & Huang, H. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.030 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Advances and future directions of biochar characterization methods and applications
Igalavithana, A. D., Mandal, S., Niazi, N. K., Vithanage, M., Parikh, S. J., Mukome, F. N. D., Rizwan, M., Oleszczuk, P., Al-Wabel, M., Bolan, N., et al. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2017.1421844 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
El-Naggar, A., Lee, S. S., Awad, Y. M., Yang, X., Ryu, C., Rizwan, M., Rinklebe, J., Tsang, D. C. W., & Ok, Y. S. (2018) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.06.017 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Aging induced changes in biochar's functionality and adsorption behavior for phosphate and ammonium
Mia, S., Dijkstra, F. A., & Singh, B. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b00647 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Biochar-surface oxygenation with hydrogen peroxide
Huff, M. D., & Lee, J. W. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.046 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Pyrogenic carbon capture and storage
Schmidt, H., Anca‐Couce, A., Hagemann, N., Werner, C., Gerten, D., Lucht, W., & Kammann, C. (2019) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12553 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Rasul, M., Cho, J., Shin, H.-S., & Hur, J. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150304 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Wang, C., Shen, J., Liu, J., Qin, H., Yuan, Q., Fan, F., Hu, Y., Wang, J., Wei, W., Li, Y., et al. (2019) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.05.012 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Biochar influences soil carbon pools and facilitates interactions with soil: A field investigation
El‐Naggar, A., Awad, Y. M., Tang, X., Liu, C., Niazi, N. K., Jien, S., Tsang, D. C. W., Song, H., Ok, Y. S., & Lee, S. S. (2018) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.2896 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Black carbon and soil properties at historical charcoal production sites in Germany
Borchard, N., Ladd, B., Eschemann, S., Hegenberg, D., Möseler, B. M., & Amelung, W. (2014) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.05.007 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
The production of engineered biochars in a vertical auger pyrolysis reactor for carbon sequestration
Brassard, P., Godbout, S., Raghavan, V., Palacios, J., Grenier, M., & Zegan, D. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10030288 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Liu, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Lu, H., He, L., & Yang, S. (2018) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.3147 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Matuštík, J., Pohořelý, M., & Kočí, V. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151058 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kuzyakov, Y., Bogomolova, I., & Glaser, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kuzyakov, Yakov
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 70
- Pages
- 229-236
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088901483
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 58.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- GRO (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- biochar stability, pyrogenic carbon, black carbon, dissolved organic matter, microbial biomass, neutral lipids, glycolipids, phospholipids, polysaccharides, benzene polycarboxylic acids, Haplic Luvisol, loess, soil carbon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
