Cited by 208Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesIchthyology and Marine Biology

Near real-time spatial management based on habitat predictions for a longline bycatch species

Open access
HOBDAY, A. J., HARTMANN, K.·2006·Fisheries Management and Ecology

Abstract

Southern bluefin tuna (SBT), Thunnus maccoyii (Castelnau), is a quota‐managed species that makes annual winter migrations to the Tasman Sea off south‐eastern Australia. During this period it interacts with a year‐round tropical tuna longline fishery (Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery, ETBF). ETBF managers seek to minimise the bycatch of SBT by commercial ETBF longline fishers with limited or no SBT quota through spatial restrictions. Access to areas where SBT are believed to be present is restricted to fishers holding SBT quota. A temperature‐based SBT habitat model was developed to provide managers with an estimate of tuna distribution upon which to base their decisions about placement of management boundaries. Adult SBT temperature preferences were determined using pop‐up satellite archival tags. The near real‐time predicted location of SBT was determined by matching temperature preferences to satellite sea surface temperature data and vertical temperature data from an oceanographic model. Regular reports detailing the location of temperature‐based SBT habitat were produced during the period of the ETBF fishing season when interactions with SBT occur. The SBT habitat model included: (i) predictions based on the current vertical structure of the ocean; (ii) seasonally adjusted temperature preference data for the 60 calendar days centred on the prediction date; and (iii) development of a temperature‐based SBT habitat climatology that allowed visualisation of the expected chan…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2006.00515.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For southern bluefin tuna, the predicted distribution in Eastern Australia was consistent with Hobday and Hartmann (2006) and Hartog et al. (2011).

    “In the case of southern bluefin tuna, the predicted distribution in Eastern Australia was consistent with Hobday and Hartmann (2006) and Hartog et al. (2011).”

    From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Hobday and Hartmann (2006)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HOBDAY, A. J., & HARTMANN, K.
Affiliations
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU)
Corresponding author
HOBDAY, A. J.
Venue
Fisheries Management and Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11-10
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
365-380
ISSN
  • 0969-997X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2400
OpenAlex
W2113192283
Cited by
208
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fisheries Management and Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
southern bluefin tuna, Thunnus maccoyii, bycatch management, longline fisheries, sea surface temperature, tuna migration, Tasman Sea, pop-up satellite archival tags

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review