Cited by 781Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesIchthyology and Marine Biology

Electronic tagging and population structure of Atlantic bluefin tuna

Block, Barbara A., Teo, Steven L. H., Walli, Andreas, Boustany, Andre, Stokesbury, Michael J. W., Farwell, Charles J., Weng, Kevin C., Dewar, Heidi +1 more·2005·Nature

Abstract

Electronic tags that archive or transmit stored data to satellites have advanced the mapping of habitats used by highly migratory fish in pelagic ecosystems. Here we report on the electronic tagging of 772 Atlantic bluefin tuna in the western Atlantic Ocean in an effort to identify population structure. Reporting electronic tags provided accurate location data that show the extensive migrations of individual fish (n = 330). Geoposition data delineate two populations, one using spawning grounds in the Gulf of Mexico and another from the Mediterranean Sea. Transatlantic movements of western-tagged bluefin tuna reveal site fidelity to known spawning areas in the Mediterranean Sea. Bluefin tuna that occupy western spawning grounds move to central and eastern Atlantic foraging grounds. Our results are consistent with two populations of bluefin tuna with distinct spawning areas that overlap on North Atlantic foraging grounds. Electronic tagging locations, when combined with US pelagic longline observer and logbook catch data, identify hot spots for spawning bluefin tuna in the northern slope waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Restrictions on the time and area where longlining occurs would reduce incidental catch mortalities on western spawning grounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature03463

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Block, B. A., Teo, S. L. H., Walli, A., Boustany, A., Stokesbury, M. J. W., Farwell, C. J., Weng, K. C., Dewar, H., & Williams, T. D.
Affiliations
  • Hopkins Marine Station (US)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Block, Barbara A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2005-04
Volume
434
Issue
7037
Pages
1121-1127
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2005587094
Cited by
781
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 50
FWCI
35.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
Thunnus thynnus, electronic monitoring, population structure (demography), transatlantic migration, spawning grounds, Gulf of Mexico, Mediterranean Sea, site fidelity, foraging habitat, fisheries conservation, highly migratory fish
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Identification Systems, Atlantic Ocean, Electronics, Environment, Feeding Behavior, Mediterranean Sea, Mexico, Population Dynamics, Reproduction, Seawater, Temperature, Time Factors, Tuna, Animal Migration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review