The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Bering Sea Green Belt: shelf‐edge processes and ecosystem production
Abstract
The concept of a highly productive habitat, or Green Belt, along the edge of the continental shelf in the Bering Sea is based upon compelling but fragmentary and often anecdotal observations of a variety of physical and biological features acquired from many sources over many years. Enhanced production at continental margins is not a novel concept, but in the case of the Bering Sea its importance has been overlooked during studies of the unusually broad continental shelf. The limited data reported from the vicinity of the shelf edge in the Bering Sea indicate that annual primary production can be as high as 175 to 275 g C m˜ year‐, or approximately 60% greater than production in the adjacent outer shelf domain and 270% greater than in the oceanic domain. Estimates of annual secondary production at the eastern shelf edge also average approximately 60% higher than estimates for the outer domain and 260% higher than those for the oceanic domain. Physical processes at the shelf edge, such as intensive tidal mixing and transverse circulation and eddies in the Bering Slope Current, bring nutrients into the euphoric zone and contribute to enhanced primary and secondary production and elevated biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton. Fishes and squids concentrate in this narrow corridor because of favourable feeding conditions and because of a thermal refuge from cold shelf‐bottom temperatures that can be found at the shelf edge from fall to spring. The abundance of zooplankton, fishes and squids, in turn, attracts large numbers of marine birds and mammals. In aggregate, the observations suggest that sustained primary productivity, intense food web exchange and high transfer efficiency at the shelf edge are important to biomass yield at numerous trophic levels and to ecosystem production of the Bering Sea.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Climate change and control of the southeastern Bering Sea pelagic ecosystem
Hunt Jr, G. L., Stabeno, P., Walters, G., Sinclair, E., Brodeur, R. D., Napp, J. M., & Bond, N. A. (2002) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/s0967-0645(02)00321-1 · Cited by 567
Braune, B. M., Outridge, P. M., Fisk, A. T., Muir, D. C. G., Helm, P. A., Hobbs, K., Hoekstra, P. F., Kuzyk, Z. A., Kwan, M., Letcher, R. J., et al. (2005) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.10.034 · Cited by 434
Marine protected areas and ocean basin management
Hyrenbach, K. D., Forney, K. A., & Dayton, P. K. (2000) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/1099-0755(200011/12)10:6<437::aid-aqc425>3.0.co;2-q · Cited by 401
Population structure and dynamics of walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma
Bailey, K. M., Quinn, T. J., Bentzen, R., & Grant, W. S. (1999) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2881(08)60429-0 · Cited by 101
Boom-bust cycles in gray whales associated with dynamic and changing Arctic conditions
Stewart, J. D., Joyce, T. W., Durban, J. W., Calambokidis, J., Fauquier, D., Fearnbach, H., Grebmeier, J. M., Lynn, M., Manizza, M., Perryman, W. L., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adi1847 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- SPRINGER, A. M., McROY, C. P., & FLINT, M. V.
- Venue
- Fisheries Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 205-223
- ISSN
- 1054-6006 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2419
- OpenAlex
- W2050278722
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Bering Sea Green Belt: shelf‐edge processes and ecosystem production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2419.1996.tb00118.x
- The paper
- SPRINGER, A. M., McROY, C. P., & FLINT, M. V. (1996). The Bering Sea Green Belt: shelf‐edge processes and ecosystem production. Fisheries Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2419.1996.tb00118.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.