Invasive species profiling? Exploring the characteristics of non‐native fishes across invasion stages in California
Abstract
Summary 1. The global spread of non‐native species is a major concern for ecologists, particularly in regards to aquatic systems. Predicting the characteristics of successful invaders has been a goal of invasion biology for decades. Quantitative analysis of species characteristics may allow invasive species profiling and assist the development of risk assessment strategies. 2. In the current analysis we developed a data base on fish invasions in catchments throughout California that distinguishes among the establishment, spread and integration stages of the invasion process, and separates social and biological factors related to invasion success. 3. Using Akaike's information criteria (AIC), logistic and multiple regression models, we show suites of biological variables, which are important in predicting establishment (parental care and physiological tolerance), spread (life span, distance from nearest native source and trophic status) and abundance (maximum size, physiological tolerance and distance from nearest native source). Two variables indicating human interest in a species (propagule pressure and prior invasion success) are predictors of successful establishment and prior invasion success is a predictor of spread and integration. 4. Despite the idiosyncratic nature of the invasion process, our results suggest some assistance in the search for characteristics of fish species that successfully transition between invasion stages.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Piscivores are believed most capable of altering the communities which they invade.
“Piscivores are believed most capable of altering the communities which they invade”
From Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes (2011) · cites this paper as Marchetti et al. 2004
Cites
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000) · doi:10.1002/0471722146 · Cited by 20,302 · see citing works
Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: the Bonferroni vs Holm methods.
Aickin, M., & Gensler, H. (1996) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.86.5.726 · Cited by 1,346 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Muñoz, R., Currin, C., & Whitfield, P. (2011) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps09154 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
- Authors
- Marchetti, M. P., Moyle, P. B., & Levine, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- San Diego State University (US)
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04-16
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 646-661
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W2074145627
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Freshwater Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
- Keywords
- invasive fish, introduced species, invasion stages, invasion success, species traits, propagule pressure, physiological tolerance, parental care, lifespan, trophic state, risk assessment, California
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review