Cited by 1,334Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsMarine and coastal ecosystems

Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading-an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies

Open access
JEPPESEN, ERIK, SØNDERGAARD, MARTIN, JENSEN, JENS PEDER, HAVENS, KARL E., ANNEVILLE, ORLANE, CARVALHO, LAURENCE, COVENEY, MICHAEL F., DENEKE, RAINER +22 more·2005·Freshwater Biology

Abstract

Summary: 1. This synthesis examines 35 long‐term (5–35 years, mean: 16 years) lake re‐oligotrophication studies. It covers lakes ranging from shallow (mean depth <5 m and/or polymictic) to deep (mean depth up to 177 m), oligotrophic to hypertrophic (summer mean total phosphorus concentration from 7.5 to 3500 μ g L −1 before loading reduction), subtropical to temperate (latitude: 28–65°), and lowland to upland (altitude: 0–481 m). Shallow north‐temperate lakes were most abundant. 2. Reduction of external total phosphorus (TP) loading resulted in lower in‐lake TP concentration, lower chlorophyll a (chl a ) concentration and higher Secchi depth in most lakes. Internal loading delayed the recovery, but in most lakes a new equilibrium for TP was reached after 10–15 years, which was only marginally influenced by the hydraulic retention time of the lakes. With decreasing TP concentration, the concentration of soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) also declined substantially. 3. Decreases (if any) in total nitrogen (TN) loading were lower than for TP in most lakes. As a result, the TN : TP ratio in lake water increased in 80% of the lakes. In lakes where the TN loading was reduced, the annual mean in‐lake TN concentration responded rapidly. Concentrations largely followed predictions derived from an empirical model developed earlier for Danish lakes, which includes external TN loading, hydraulic retention time and mean depth as explanatory variables. 4. Phytoplankton clearly responded to reduced nutrient loading, mainly reflecting declining TP concentrations. Declines in phytoplankton biomass were accompanied by shifts in community structure. In deep lakes, chrysophytes and dinophytes assumed greater importance at the expense of cyanobacteria. Diatoms, cryptophytes and chrysophytes became more dominant in shallow lakes, while no significant change was seen for cyanobacteria. 5. The observed declines in phytoplankton biomass and chl a may have been further augmented by enhanced zooplankton grazing, as indicated by increases in the zooplankton : phytoplankton biomass ratio and declines in the chl a : TP ratio at a summer mean TP concentration of <100–150 μ g L −1 . This effect was strongest in shallow lakes. This implies potentially higher rates of zooplankton grazing and may be ascribed to the observed large changes in fish community structure and biomass with decreasing TP contribution. In 82% of the lakes for which data on fish are available, fish biomass declined with TP. The percentage of piscivores increased in 80% of those lakes and often a shift occurred towards dominance by fish species characteristic of less eutrophic waters. 6. Data on macrophytes were available only for a small subsample of lakes. In several of those lakes, abundance, coverage, plant volume inhabited or depth distribution of submerged macrophytes increased during oligotrophication, but in others no changes were observed despite greater water clarity. 7. Recovery of lakes after nutrient loading reduction may be confounded by concomitant environmental changes such as global warming. However, effects of global change are likely to run counter to reductions in nutrient loading rather than reinforcing re‐oligotrophication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01415.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phytoplankton concentrations were subsequently reduced significantly, linked to the decline of TP concentrations in water.

    “As a consequence, concentrations of phytoplankton were subsequently reduced significantly, linked to the decline of TP concentrations in water and probably accompanied by zooplankton and fish community struc­ ture change (Jeppesen et al., 2005).”

    From A meta-analysis of environmental responses to freshwater ecosystem restoration in China (1987–2018) (2023) · cites this paper as Jeppesen et al., 2005

    The ‘Phytoplankton biomass and community structure’ section reports declining biomass in most shallow and deep lakes, consistent with the reported association with lower TP. It also labels the overall biomass-decline pattern as not significant (NS), so the claim that phytoplankton was reduced significantly overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies of reoligotrophication and effects on fish communities have mixed results, with most reporting a decline in species abundance coinciding with lowered nutrients.

    “Studies of reoligotrophication and effects on fish communities have mixed results, with most reporting a decline in species abundance coinciding with lowered nutrients (Jeppesen et al. 2005).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Anneville O., Ginot V., Druart J.-C. & Angeli N. (2002) Long-term study (1974-1998) of seasonal changes in the phytoplankton in Lake Geneva: a multi-table approach. Journal of Plankton Research, 24, 993-1007.
  2. Anneville O., Gammeter S. & Straile D. (2005) Phosphorus decrease and climate variability: mediators of syn- chrony in phytoplankton changes among European peri-alpine lakes. Freshwater Biology, 50, doi: 10.1111/ j.1365-2427.2005.01429.x. · DOI
  3. Bays J.S. & Crisman T.L. (1983) Zooplankton and trophic state relationships in Florida lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 40, 1813-1819.
  4. Carpenter S.R. & Kitchell J.F. (1993) The Trophic Cascade in Lakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  5. Colby P.J., Spangler G.R., Hurley D.A. & McCombie A.M. (1972) Effects of eutrophication on salmonid communities in oligotrophic lakes. Journal of the Fish- eries Research Board of Canada, 29, 975-983.
  6. Coveney M. F., Lowe E.F., Battoe L.E., Marzolf E.R. & Conrow R. (2005) Response of a eutrophic, shallow subtropical lake to reduced nutrient loading. Fresh- water Biology, 50, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01435.x. · DOI
  7. Dokulil M.T. & Teubner K. (2005) Do phytoplankton assemblages correctly track trophic changes? An assessment using directly measured and palaeolimno- logical data. Freshwater Biology, 50, doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2427.2005.01431.x. · DOI
  8. Hameed H.A., Kilinc S., McGowan S. & Moss B. (1999) Physiological tests and bioassays -aids or superfluities to the diagnosis of phytoplankton nutrient limitation? A comparative study in the Broads and Meres of England. European Phycological Journal, 34, 253-270.
  9. Hanson J.M. & Peters R.H. (1984) Empirical prediction of crustacean zooplankton biomass and profundal macro- benthos biomass in lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 41, 439-445.
  10. Jeppesen E., Jensen J.P. & Søndergaard M. (2002) Response of phytoplankton, zooplankton and fish to re-oligotro- Re-oligotrophication of lakes 1765 Ó 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Freshwater Biology, 50, 1747-1771 13652427, 2005, 10, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01415.x, Wiley Online Library on [22/06/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License phication: an 11-year study of 23 Danish lakes. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 5, 31-43.
  11. Jeppesen E., Jensen J.P., Søndergaard M. & Lauridsen T.L. (2005a) Response of fish and plankton to nutrient loading reduction in eight shallow Danish lakes with special emphasis on seasonal dynamics. Freshwater Biology, 50, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01413.x. · DOI
  12. Jeppesen E., Søndergaard M., Mazzeo N., Meerhoff M., Branco C., Huszar V. & Scasso F. (2005b) Lake restoration and biomanipulation in temperate lakes: relevance for subtropical and tropical lakes. In: Restoration and Management of Tropical Eutrophic Lakes. (Ed. M.V. Reddy), pp. 331-349. Oxford & IBH Publish- ing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
  13. Keller W. & Conlon M. (1994) Crustacean zooplankton community and lake morphometry in Precambrian shields. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 51, 2424-2434.
  14. Ko ¨hler J., Hilt S., Adrian R., Nicklisch A., Kozerski H.P. & Walz N. (2005) Long-term response of a shallow, moderately flushed lake to reduced external phos- phorus and nitrogen loading. Freshwater Biology, 50, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01430.x. · DOI
  15. Levine S.N. & Schindler D.W. (1989) Phosphorus, nitrogen, and carbon dynamics of experimental Lake 303 during recovery from eutrophication. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 46, 2-10.
  16. McCauley E., Downing J.A. & Watson S. (1989) Sigmoid relationships between nutrients and chlorophyll among lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 46, 1171-1175.
  17. Mitchell S.F. & Perrow M.R. (1997) Interactions between grazing birds and macrophytes. In: The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes. (Eds E. Jeppesen, MA. Søndergaard, MO. Søndergaard, & K. Christof- fersen), Ecological Studies, Volume 131. pp. 175-196. Springer Verlag, New York.
  18. Mosello R.A., Barbieri A., Brizzio M.C., Calderoni A., Marchetto A., Passera S., Rogora M. & Tartari G.A. (2001) Nitrogen budget of Lago Maggiore: the relative importance of atmospheric deposition and catchment sources. Journal of Limnology, 60, 27-40.
  19. Moss B., McKee D., Atkinson S., Collings S.E., Eaton J.W., Gill A.B., Harvey I., Hatton K., Heyes T. & Wilson D. (2003) How important is climate? Effects of warming, nutrient addition and fish on phytoplankton in shallow lake microcosms. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 782-792.
  20. Moss B., Barker T., Stephen D., Williams A.E., Balayla D., Beklioglu M. & Carvalho L. (2005) Consequences of reduced nutrient loading on a lake system in a lowland catchment: deviations from the norm? Freshwater Biology, 50, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01416.x. · DOI
  21. Persson L., Andersson G., Hamrin S.F. & Johansson L. (1988) Predation regulation and primary production along the productivity gradient of temperate lake ecosystems. In: Complex Interactions in Lake Commu- nities. (Eds S.R. Carpenter), pp. 45-65. Springer Verlag, New York.
  22. Phillips G., Kelly A., Pitt J.-A., Sanderson R. & Taylor E. (2005) The recovery of a very shallow eutrophic lake, 20 years after the control of effluent derived phospho- rus. Freshwater Biology, 50, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427. 2005.01434.x. · DOI
  23. Romo S., Villena M.-J., Sahuquillo M., Soria J.M., Gime ´nez M., Alfonso T., Vicente E. & Miracle M.R. (2005) Response of a shallow Mediterranean lake to nutrient diversion: does it follow similar patterns as in northern shallow lakes? Freshwater Biology, 50, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01432.x. · DOI
  24. Sas H. (Ed.) (1989) Lake Restoration by Reduction of Nutrient Loading. Expectation, Experiences, Extrapolation. Academia Verlag Richardz GmbH., St Augustin.
  25. Schelske C. L., Stoermer E. F., Fahnenstiel G. L. & Haibach M. (1986) Phosphorus enrichment, silica utilization, and biogeochemical silica depletion in the Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 43, 407-415.
  26. Schulz E.J, Hoyer M.V. & Canfield D.E. (1999) An index of biotic integrity: a test with limnological and fish data from sixty Florida Lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 128, 564-577.
  27. Sharpley A., Foy B. & Whiters P. (2000) Practical and innovative measures for control of agricultural phos- phorus losses to water: an overview. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29, 1-9.
  28. Søndergaard M., Jensen J.P. & Jeppesen E. (2005) Seasonal response of nutrients to reduced phosphorus loading in 12 Danish lakes. Freshwater Biology, 50, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01412.x. · DOI
  29. Re-oligotrophication of lakes 1767 Ó 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Freshwater Biology, 50, 1747-1771 13652427, 2005, 10, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01415.x, Wiley Online Library on [22/06/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JEPPESEN, E., SØNDERGAARD, M., JENSEN, J. P., HAVENS, K. E., ANNEVILLE, O., CARVALHO, L., COVENEY, M. F., DENEKE, R., DOKULIL, M. T., FOY, B., GERDEAUX, D., HAMPTON, S. E., HILT, S., KANGUR, K., KÖHLER, J., LAMMENS, E. H. H. R., LAURIDSEN, T. L., MANCA, M., MIRACLE, M. R., MOSS, B., NÕGES, P., PERSSON, G., PHILLIPS, G., PORTIELJE, R., ROMO, S., SCHELSKE, C. L., STRAILE, D., TATRAI, I., WILLÉN, E., & WINDER, M.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et les Ecosystèmes Limniques (FR)
  • Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg (DE)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (DE)
  • Estonian University of Life Sciences (EE)
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • Universitat de València (ES)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
  • Environment Agency (GB)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
Corresponding author
JEPPESEN, ERIK
Venue
Freshwater Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-26
Volume
50
Issue
10
Pages
1747-1771
ISSN
  • 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2427
OpenAlex
W2037612458
Cited by
1,334
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 43
FWCI
31.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Freshwater Biology (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • CNR ExploRA (submittedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
nutrient load reduction, phosphorus loading, nitrogen loading, internal phosphorus loading, hydraulic retention time, phytoplankton community structure, zooplankton grazing, chlorophyll a, Secchi depth, soluble reactive phosphorus, Chrysophyceae, dinoflagellates, cyanobacteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review