Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Algal and cyanobacterial secondary metabolites in freshwaters: a comparison of allelopathic compounds and toxins

Open access
LEFLAIVE, JOSE´PHINE, TEN‐HAGE, LOÏC·2007·Freshwater Biology

Abstract

Summary: 1. The photoautotrophic micro‐organisms collectively termed ‘micro‐algae’ (including micro‐eukaryotes and cyanobacteria) are known to produce a wide range of secondary metabolites with various biological actions. A small subset of these compounds has been identified. Some of them, termed allelopathic compounds, have been shown to play a role in allelopathy, defined here as inhibitory effects of secondary metabolites against either competitors or predators. Freshwater cyanobacteria also produce some secondary metabolites, termed toxins, which are highly toxic for animals. 2. While allelopathic compounds play a role in the interactions between the emitter organisms and their direct competitors or predators, toxins are categorised according to their toxic effect on several organisms, including some that may not be present in their immediate environment. However, these two definitions are not mutually exclusive. This review considers the evolutionary, ecological and physiological aspects of the production of allelopathic compounds by micro‐algae in freshwaters, and compares the characteristics of allelopathic compounds with those of toxins. 3. Allelopathic compounds include alkaloids, cyclic peptides, terpens and volatile organic compounds. Toxins include alkaloids, cyclic peptides and lipopolysaccharides. No allelopathic compound type is associated with a particular phylogenetic group of algae. In contrast, freshwater toxins are only produced by cyanobacteria belonging to a restricted number of genera. Allelopathic compounds have various modes of action, from inhibition of photosynthesis to oxidative stress or cellular paralysis. Toxins are often enzyme inhibitors, or interfere with cell membrane receptors. 4. The ecological roles of allelopathic compounds have been well identified in several cases, but those of toxins are still debated. In the light of descriptions of negative effects of toxins on both micro‐invertebrates and photoautotrophic organisms, we suggest that at least some toxins should actually be considered as allelopathic compounds. Further research on toxic secondary metabolites in freshwaters is now needed, with emphasis on the ecological effects of the compounds in the immediate environment of the emitter algae.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01689.x

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
LEFLAIVE, J., & TEN‐HAGE, L.
Venue
Freshwater Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-11
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
199-214
ISSN
  • 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2427
OpenAlex
W2042069588
Cited by
377
References
73
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Algal and cyanobacterial secondary metabolites in freshwaters: a comparison of allelopathic compounds and toxins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01689.x
The paper
LEFLAIVE, J., & TEN‐HAGE, L. (2007). Algal and cyanobacterial secondary metabolites in freshwaters: a comparison of allelopathic compounds and toxins. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01689.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.