Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiple stressors in coupled river–floodplain ecosystems

TOCKNER, KLEMENT, PUSCH, MARTIN, BORCHARDT, DIETRICH, LORANG, MARK S.·2010·Freshwater Biology

Abstract

Summary: 1. Riverine floodplains are highly complex, dynamic and diverse ecosystems. At the same time they are among the world’s most threatened ecosystems because of the pervasiveness of dams, levees and other factors such as rapid spreading of non‐native species. Hence, floodplains are ideal systems to study ecological impacts of multiple stressors at the local, regional and catchment scale. 2. Concepts such as the subsidy‐stress hypothesis and the stress‐induced community tolerance concept have been formulated to study the effect of stressors on aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, as well as on their functional linkages. 3. Riverine floodplains are pulsed ecosystems with distinct flow, sediment, resource and thermal pulses – thereby creating distinct ‘windows of ecological opportunity’. Human modifications that truncate or amplify theses pulses will have cascading effects on river–floodplain interactions by shifting the thresholds of connectivity, resilience or resistance – causing drastic regime shifts. 4. Most aquatic insects and pond‐breeding amphibians have complex life cycles with aquatic and terrestrial stages. They are exposed to different stressors in their aquatic and terrestrial realm. Because most life history functions of aquatic insects are restricted to a short terrestrial period, we need to fully integrate the ‘airscape’ into the future management of river–floodplain ecosystems. 5. Riverine floodplains integrate and accumulate multiple stressors at the catchment level, as reflected by distinct catchment fingerprints. Based on the European Catchment Data Base we provide spatially explicit information on multiple stressors; a key prerequisite for setting priorities in conservation and management planning. 6. Thematic implications: the management of stressed river and floodplain ecosystems is a major challenge for the near future and water managers worldwide. Management approaches need to be adaptive and embedded within a catchment‐wide concept to cope with upcoming pressures originating from global change.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02371.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
TOCKNER, K., PUSCH, M., BORCHARDT, D., & LORANG, M. S.
Venue
Freshwater Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01
Volume
55
Issue
s1
Pages
135-151
ISSN
  • 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2427
OpenAlex
W2011133046
Cited by
448
References
1
FWCI
16.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple stressors in coupled river–floodplain ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02371.x
The paper
TOCKNER, K., PUSCH, M., BORCHARDT, D., & LORANG, M. S. (2010). Multiple stressors in coupled river–floodplain ecosystems. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02371.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.