The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eco‐evolutionary conservation biology: contemporary evolution and the dynamics of persistence
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Natural and human mediated perturbations present challenges to the fate of populations but fuel contemporary evolution (evolution over humanly observable time‐scales). Here we ask if such evolution is sufficient to make the difference between population extinction and persistence. To answer this question requires a shift from the usual focus on trait evolution to the emergent ‘eco‐evolutionary’ dynamics that arise through interactions of evolution, its fitness consequences and population abundance. By combining theory, models and insights from empirical studies of contemporary evolution, we provide an assessment of three contexts: persistence of populations in situ, persistence of colonising populations, and persistence under gene flow and in metapopulations. Contemporary evolution can likely rescue some, but not all, populations facing environmental change. Populations may fail partly because of the demographic cost of selection. Contemporary evolution that initiates positive population growth, such as selective founding processes, may create a ‘persistence vortex’ that overcomes the problems of small populations. Complex, even shifting, relationships between gene flow and adaptation may aid the persistence of subpopulations as well as the persistence and expansion of metapopulations. An eco‐evolutionary perspective suggests that we expand our focus beyond the acute problems of threatened populations and growing invasions, to consider how contemporary evolutionary mechanics contribute to such problems in the first place or affect their resolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird
Both, C., Bouwhuis, S., Lessells, C. M., & Visser, M. E. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04539 · Cited by 1,461
A novel CPx‐ATPase from the cadmium hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens
Bernard, C., Roosens, N., Czernic, P., Lebrun, M., & Verbruggen, N. (2004) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2004.05.036 · Cited by 248
Cited by
The ecological importance of intraspecific variation
Des Roches, S., Post, D. M., Turley, N. E., Bailey, J. K., Hendry, A. P., Kinnison, M. T., Schweitzer, J. A., & Palkovacs, E. P. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0402-5 · Cited by 916
Self-citationHuman predators outpace other agents of trait change in the wild
Darimont, C. T., Carlson, S. M., Kinnison, M. T., Paquet, P. C., Reimchen, T. E., & Wilmers, C. C. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0809235106 · Cited by 618
Self-citationHuman influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences
Hendry, A. P., Gotanda, K. M., & Svensson, E. I. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0028 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- KINNISON, M. T., & HAIRSTON, N. G.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05-22
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 444-454
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2435
- OpenAlex
- W2118992195
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eco‐evolutionary conservation biology: contemporary evolution and the dynamics of persistence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01278.x
- The paper
- KINNISON, M. T., & HAIRSTON, N. G. (2007). Eco‐evolutionary conservation biology: contemporary evolution and the dynamics of persistence. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01278.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.