The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
N : P ratios influence litter decomposition and colonization by fungi and bacteria in microcosms
Open accessAbstract
1 Nitrogen and phosphorus supply influences the rate of litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics during decomposition. Besides the total amount of N and P available to decomposers, their relative supply (N : P ratio) might be important, e.g. through an influence on the composition and activity of microbial communities. 2 We carried out two experiments using laboratory microcosms to test that (i) N : P ratios (in either litter or the environment) determine whether N or P limits the rate of decomposition, (ii) the ‘critical’ N : P ratio between N and P limitation depends on overall nutrient availability, (iii) litter colonization by fungi and bacteria depends on the N : P ratio, and (iv) N : P ratios determine if proportionately more N or P is retained or immobilized by the litter. 3 In one experiment, cellulose as a nutrient-free litter analogue was incubated on sand fertilized with varying N : P supply ratios, whereas in a second experiment, Carex leaf litter with varying N : P ratios was incubated on nutrient-free sand. 4 Results essentially support our hypotheses. Cellulose decomposition was N- or P-limited depending on the N : P supply ratio. The shift from N to P limitation occurred at N : P supply ratios of 1·7–45, depending on overall nutrient supply. Bacteria were most abundant on cellulose at low N : P supply ratios, when decomposition was N-limited, while fungi were relatively more important at high N : P ratios, when decomposition was P-limited. The amounts of mineral N and P immobilized on cellulose and those released from litter, both in absolute terms and relative to supply, depended on the type of nutrient limitation (N vs. P). 5 The N : P ratio of nutrients available to decomposers appears to be an important determinant of plant litter decomposition, the relative importance of fungi and bacteria in litter-associated microbial communities, and litter nutrient dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HETEROTROPHIC NITROGEN FIXATION IN DECOMPOSING LITTER: PATTERNS AND REGULATION
Vitousek, P. M., & Hobbie, S. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2366:hnfidl]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 197
Cited by
Sander, M. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b05208 · Cited by 319
Penuelas, J., Janssens, I. A., Ciais, P., Obersteiner, M., & Sardans, J. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14981 · Cited by 318
A plant–microbe interaction framework explaining nutrient effects on primary production
Čapek, P., Manzoni, S., Kaštovská, E., Wild, B., Diáková, K., Bárta, J., Schnecker, J., Biasi, C., Martikainen, P. J., Alves, R. J. E., et al. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0662-8 · Cited by 159
The phosphorus‐rich signature of fire in the soil–plant system: a global meta‐analysis
Butler, O. M., Elser, J. J., Lewis, T., Mackey, B., & Chen, C. (2018) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12896 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Güsewell, S., & Gessner, M. O.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01-16
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 211-219
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2435
- OpenAlex
- W2112940717
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: N : P ratios influence litter decomposition and colonization by fungi and bacteria in microcosms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01478.x
- The paper
- Güsewell, S., & Gessner, M. O. (2009). N : P ratios influence litter decomposition and colonization by fungi and bacteria in microcosms. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01478.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.