The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. Indices quantifying the functional aspect of biodiversity are essential in understanding relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and environmental constraints. Many indices of functional diversity have been published but we lack consensus about what indices quantify, how redundant they are and which ones are recommended. 2. This study aims to build a typology of functional diversity indices from artificial data sets encompassing various community structures (different assembly rules, various species richness levels) and to identify a set of independent indices able to discriminate community assembly rules. 3. Our results confirm that indices can be divided into three main categories, each of these corresponding to one aspect of functional diversity: functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence. Most published indices are highly correlated and quantify functional richness while quadratic entropy ( Q ) represents a mix between functional richness and functional divergence. Conversely, two indices (FEve and FDiv respectively quantifying functional evenness and functional divergence) are rather independent to all the others. The power analysis revealed that some indices efficiently detect assembly rules while others performed poorly. 4. To accurately assess functional diversity and establish its relationships with ecosystem functioning and environmental constraints, we recommend investigating each functional component separately with the appropriate index. Guidelines are provided to help choosing appropriate indices given the issue being investigated. 5. This study demonstrates that functional diversity indices have the potential to reveal the processes that structure biological communities. Combined with complementary methods (phylogenetic and taxonomic diversity), the multifaceted framework of functional diversity will help improve our understanding of how biodiversity interacts with ecosystem processes and environmental constraints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography
Jetschke, G. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1771:tuntob]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,993
Measuring biological diversity
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-1547 · Cited by 6,621
The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species
Macarthur, R., & Levins, R. (1967) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282505 · Cited by 4,611
Phylogenies and Community Ecology
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A., & Donoghue, M. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448 · Cited by 4,609
Measuring Biological Diversity
REID, J. R. W. (2005) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01502.x · Cited by 4,442
NEW MULTIDIMENSIONAL FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY INDICES FOR A MULTIFACETED FRAMEWORK IN FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
Villéger, S., Mason, N. W. H., & Mouillot, D. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1206.1 · Cited by 3,585
Self-citationHardin, G. (1960) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.131.3409.1292 · Cited by 3,426
The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes
Tilman, D., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Reich, P., Ritchie, M., & Siemann, E. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5330.1300 · Cited by 3,199
Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward
Petchey, O. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x · Cited by 2,571
Cited by
Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services
Cadotte, M. W., Carscadden, K., & Mirotchnick, N. (2011) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x · Cited by 2,396
A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances
Mouillot, D., Graham, N. A. J., Villéger, S., Mason, N. W. H., & Bellwood, D. R. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.004 · Cited by 2,117
Self-citationCWM and Rao’s quadratic diversity: a unified framework for functional ecology
Ricotta, C., & Moretti, M. (2011) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-011-1965-5 · Cited by 594
Hypervolume concepts in niche‐ and trait‐based ecology
Blonder, B. (2018) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.03187 · Cited by 389
Designing mixtures of varieties for multifunctional agriculture with the help of ecology. A review
Barot, S., Allard, V., Cantarel, A., Enjalbert, J., Gauffreteau, A., Goldringer, I., Lata, J.-C., Le Roux, X., Niboyet, A., & Porcher, E. (2017) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-017-0418-x · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Mouchet, M. A., Villéger, S., Mason, N. W. H., & Mouillot, D.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-13
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 867-876
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2435
- OpenAlex
- W1603378435
- Cited by
- 1,636
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 31.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01695.x
- The paper
- Mouchet, M. A., Villéger, S., Mason, N. W. H., & Mouillot, D. (2010). Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01695.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.