The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing mixtures of varieties for multifunctional agriculture with the help of ecology. A review
Open accessAbstract
The study of natural ecosystems and experiments using mixtures of plant species demonstrates that both species and genetic diversity generally promote ecosystem functioning. Therefore, mixing crop varieties is a promising alternative practice to transform modern high-input agriculture that is associated with a drastic reduction of within-field crop genetic diversity and is widely recognized as unsustainable. Here, we review the effects of mixtures of varieties on ecosystem functioning, and their underlying ecological mechanisms, as studied in ecology and agronomy, and outline how this knowledge can help designing more efficient mixtures. We recommend the development of two complementary strategies to optimize variety mixtures by fostering the ecological mechanisms leading to a positive relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and its stability through time, i.e., sampling and complementarity effects. (1) In the “trait-blind” approach, the design of high-performance mixtures is based on estimations of the mixing abilities of varieties. While this approach is operational because it does not require detailed trait knowledge, it relies on heavy experimental designs to evaluate mixing ability. (2) The trait-based approach is particularly efficient to design mixtures of varieties to provide particular baskets of services but requires building databases of traits for crop varieties and documenting the relations between traits and services. The performance of mixtures requires eventually to be evaluated in real economic, social, and agronomic contexts. We conclude that the need of a multifunctional low-input agriculture strongly increases the attractiveness of mixtures but that new breeding approaches are required to create varieties with higher mixing abilities, to foster complementarity and selection effects through an increase in the variance of relevant traits and to explore new combinations of trait values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10452 · Cited by 8,476
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
Let the concept of trait be functional!
Violle, C., Navas, M., Vile, D., Kazakou, E., Fortunel, C., Hummel, I., & Garnier, E. (2007) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.x · Cited by 5,243
The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought
Cordell, D., Drangert, J.-O., & White, S. (2009) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009 · Cited by 5,171
The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend
Herms, D. A., & Mattson, W. J. (1992) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/417659 · Cited by 4,262
New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide
Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Díaz, S., Garnier, E., Lavorel, S., Poorter, H., Jaureguiberry, P., Bret-Harte, M. S., Cornwell, W. K., Craine, J. M., Gurvich, D. E., et al. (2013) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt12225 · Cited by 4,240
A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide
Cornelissen, J. H. C., Lavorel, S., Garnier, E., Díaz, S., Buchmann, N., Gurvich, D. E., Reich, P. B., Steege, H. T., Morgan, H. D., Heijden, M. G. A. V. D., et al. (2003) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt02124 · Cited by 4,079
Concept of General and Specific Combining Ability in Relation to Diallel Crossing Systems
Griffing, B. (1956) · Australian Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.1071/bi9560463 · Cited by 4,072
Positive interactions in communities
Bertness, M. D., & Callaway, R. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90088-4 · Cited by 3,823
Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments
Loreau, M., & Hector, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35083573 · Cited by 3,528
Cited by
Combining diversification practices to enhance the sustainability of conventional cropping systems
Viguier, L., Cavan, N., Bockstaller, C., Cadoux, S., Corre-Hellou, G., Dubois, S., Duval, R., Keichinger, O., Toqué, C., Toupet de Cordoue, A.-L., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2021.126279 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Barot, S., Allard, V., Cantarel, A., Enjalbert, J., Gauffreteau, A., Goldringer, I., Lata, J.-C., Le Roux, X., Niboyet, A., & Porcher, E.
- Venue
- Agronomy for Sustainable Development
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1773-0155 (ISSN-L)
- 1774-0746
- OpenAlex
- W2604936251
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 135
- FWCI
- 36.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing mixtures of varieties for multifunctional agriculture with the help of ecology. A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13593-017-0418-x
- The paper
- Barot, S., Allard, V., Cantarel, A., Enjalbert, J., Gauffreteau, A., Goldringer, I., Lata, J.-C., Le Roux, X., Niboyet, A., & Porcher, E. (2017). Designing mixtures of varieties for multifunctional agriculture with the help of ecology. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0418-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.